|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
06-13-2005, 02:46 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 3,294
  |
F@H - Protein 2684 Time Per Frame?
Can you check to see if you're running this protein (2684)? It's named p237_c21MUre99p and is worth 160 pts. I keep getting changes in its time per frame. At times it'll do a frame in around 30 mins (on a P4 2.4C), but it keeps reverting back to over 1.5 hrs per for some reason.
What's your time per frame and system, if you find this protein running? Thx.
__________________
Kov Are You Foldin'? Join PCMech's Folding@Home Team and Help Save Lives! Click Here!
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005, 01:55 PM
|
#2 |
|
HOT ROD
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
|
After looking back through some of my logs I found on a 2.8C (running at 3.1 with HT) that the early frames where finishing around 00:28 to 00:36
EDIT to correct the time frames. All of the frames were 28-36 mins I was scrolling to far down the log file with VNC and mixed WU's up. 
__________________
Fast enough 2 get by.....old enough 2 know what not 2 try -You know it was me 
Last edited by lil Jimmie; 06-14-2005 at 02:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005, 02:55 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 3,294
|
Aw, I saw your original text in the email notification, and I thought we were onto something for a second. After digging around, I found
Quote:
Quote:
Moral of the story: If you notice frames taking longer that normal, check the log file. All it takes is a restart to get it back on track. |
||
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005, 03:54 PM
|
#4 |
|
Folding For PCMech
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Dimas, CA
Posts: 3,136
|
Good tip Kov-Ice. I actually just did that with my current WU, and rather than 1hr 45min per frame, it's down to about 15min.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
