|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
01-23-2002, 01:43 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Sherman, Texas
Posts: 1,778
 |
Anthrax cure?
Anybody got any skinny on the distributed computing project that is in the news? Anthrax cure. How intrusive to your system are these background proggies?
__________________
Intel P4 2.4Ghz cpu, Intel D850MVSE mobo, ATI Radeon All-in-Wonder 8500 @275Mhz video, WD800JB 80Gb hdd, 1024Mb PC800 RDRAM, Sony DVD/CD-Rom, Sony CD-R/CD-RW, 330W Antec psu, Windows XP Pro-completed Jan. 2004 |
|
|
|
01-23-2002, 02:30 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Birmingham, UK.
Posts: 553
 |
I use the UD agent and have had no problems at all. The process that it uses is given the lowest priority therefore any other programs I have found have had no performance drop. However if you check your CPU usage it will be constantly 100%.
UD also have a cancer research project and to be quite honest I think this is a bit better cause than the Anthrax one (alot more people die of cancer) but there is an option to contribute to both if you want. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
