|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
10-05-2000, 12:09 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Secret City (Oak Ridge, TN)
Posts: 3,271
    |
Directly from http://www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu
I recommend that everyone should run the newest version. I will have all of my machine switched over by tomorrow. A few of us got ahold of 3.0 yeserday and I knew it wouldn't be long before they posted it on the official site. Well they have, it appears to be about the same as verison 2.76, how 2.76 fixed memory leaks that are in verison 2.7 and below... I have verison 3.0 running on the Duron 600 system at work and it appears to run good... Hal, I don't know what to tell you, if you install it, it will start your unit over, maybe it will run faster, maybe not... It is possible to get out of the unit, but heck even if it is going to take forever it maybe worth turnning in....
__________________
Last Job ADSL Support Specialist (Tier 2), until It was outsourced overseas. A Plus Certified : Certified Help Desk Professional. Home setup. Comcast Cable, Linksys Router, 10/100 switch, 4 wired PCs, 2 wireless laptops vontar@gmail.com From the Network Admin, In God We Trust, All others we monitor. |
|
|
|
10-05-2000, 12:17 AM
|
#2 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,525
|
I'm waiting until it's done this work unit.... not gonna let it churn away that much and have to start over. I have downloaded 3.0 and it's ready to install though.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
10-05-2000, 03:47 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: noblesville in USA
Posts: 81
|
Anyone having this problem with 3.0?
works wonderfull up to about 50% done, 150+ mflops, then it goes down to a killer 12-20 mflops. Up to the 50% setispy is saying 6-8 hours, then it jumps to 30-50 hours!! this is on c2 600@750 my celey 466@525 is a constant 60-70 mflops-sec @ 14 hours each is set to no screen saver the 600 has 128 meg ram(still trying to figure that cas2-2-2 thing out) the 466 has 64 megs any thought's or suggestions? thx |
|
|
|
|
10-05-2000, 06:46 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Christmas, Florida
Posts: 10,654
|
you bet.
it will run a lot faster in a blank screen in the screen saver mode, make the changes and you will see a big differnce in speed. the first two I did took 12-19 hrs without the blank screen, as soon as I changed it, it now takes 4-5 hrs per work unit. [Edited by bailey on 10-05-2000 at 06:49 PM] |
|
|
|
|
10-05-2000, 07:10 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: noblesville in USA
Posts: 81
|
they are allready set to blank screen, still get the same
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2000, 09:25 PM
|
#6 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,525
|
You might have got a killer work unit like the one I have now. I'm showing over 900 spikes now.
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2000, 10:14 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Secret City (Oak Ridge, TN)
Posts: 3,271
|
Over 900, I would be taking screen shots of that....I would have to keep thoses...I bet yours is one of the ones that they will rescan for themselves....that is cool.....bummer that is takes so long, but cool results.....
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
