Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Gaming and Benchmarks

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-20-2004, 03:34 PM   #1
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
FFXI - laptop good?

Hey everyone, I was wondering which laptop out of these two could run FFXI ( http://www.playonline.com/ff11us/beginners/win/ for requirements)

Compaq Presario R3055CA
P4 2.4GHz
512MB DDR RAM
ATI Radeon 9000 128MB Shared
40GB

Toshiba Satillete
P4 2.8GHz
512MB DDR RAM
ATI Radeon 9000 64MB Shared
40GB

or, a Compaq with AMD Athlon 3000+, 32MB dedicated Geforce 4 MX 440 and 60GB HDD? (Other specs same as first Compaq Presario)

Last edited by kirab; 07-20-2004 at 03:46 PM.
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 03:54 PM   #2
The Boneshaker
 
nocturnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,266
Send a message via AIM to nocturnx
Any of them should be able to run it just fine. I think the top compaq presario would be the best to use though because of the larger amount of video ram.
__________________
Leave it to me as I find a way to be
Consider me a satellite, forever orbiting
I knew all the rules, but the rules did not know me
Guaranteed

---Eddie Vedder, “Guaranteed”.
Rest in Peace, Evan.
2.11.71 - 9.8.08
nocturnx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 04:02 PM   #3
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
They are shared memory not dedicated video ram.
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 04:57 PM   #4
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 903
Send a message via AIM to ZeratulsAvenger
None will run it all that well. They are all lower grade graphics cards. It runs ok on my second system, but that is with a dedicated, non shared memory card. Also I think it's a pro(forgot). Not sure how that might affect performance, but as far as I know the shared memory isn't all that great if you want to game at all, and shared memory on a card such as the 9000 or MX is even less nice. They would run it I suppose though, just not nearly as well as you might expect when looking at the prices of those laptops.
ZeratulsAvenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 05:14 PM   #5
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
Do you think I will get about 20 - 25 FPS on medium settings? (No bumpmapping, weather effects, or all those other special effects)
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2004, 10:35 PM   #6
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 903
Send a message via AIM to ZeratulsAvenger
I really couldnt tell ya. I know it would be playable, but to what extent I really couldn't tell you. If you waited 10 days I would be home and could check to see the FPS my system gets, figure a couple off that and you would get yours. If not, I am sure someone else would know or would be willing to run the test.
ZeratulsAvenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 08:03 AM   #7
The Boneshaker
 
nocturnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,266
Send a message via AIM to nocturnx
Yea any of them would be able to run the game fine. Performance wise, i dunno, probly not that great.

Do you already have one of these laptops or looking to buy one? Cuz you could download the benchmark demo and see how it fairs.
nocturnx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 09:01 AM   #8
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
I don't own the laptop yet. But hey, I am used to not-welling-performing comps. I am using a desktop now, with 1.1 GHz Cel, 256SD RAM and Integrated Intel AGP 4MB. I played CS on this with 640x480 with 30 - 60 fps. If I can get around 20 - 25 fps on medium res that will probably do. But lately I've been looking into buying used laptops from forums.
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 10:18 AM   #9
The Boneshaker
 
nocturnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,266
Send a message via AIM to nocturnx
Hmm you could try running the FFXI benchmark test on that desktop to get a general idea of performance and you will know that it will perform better on either of the laptops. I would suggest either of the compaqs, not sure which would be better.
nocturnx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 11:18 AM   #10
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
Benchmark/game won't run on this. But even though the video cards have shared RAM, you still think it would perform well?
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 03:08 PM   #11
The Boneshaker
 
nocturnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,266
Send a message via AIM to nocturnx
Honestly I have not ever used a video device that shared ram, im not sure how it will perform. Maybe someone else here would have experience with it and performance. Anyone?
nocturnx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 03:12 PM   #12
Member (10 bit)
 
speeddude2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: on the couch
Posts: 830
Send a message via AIM to speeddude2000 Send a message via MSN to speeddude2000 Send a message via Yahoo to speeddude2000
almost ANY dedicated memory is better tahn any shared.

3rd ones best, but i would personally get the toshiba.

actually, if you are a gamer, get the last one, then upgrade the vid card. its an AGP 4x card i bet.
__________________

Pentium 4 2.8E Prescott-512MB PC2700 Dual Channel-160GB Sata HDD-Logitech Z-640 5.1 Speakers-Sound Blaster Live! 5.1-Sapphire Atlantis Radeon 9600-Sony DVD/CD-RW Combo Drive 52x/24x/52x/16

took out the logo for now. need a link for the small, dark blue version thx
speeddude2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 04:15 PM   #13
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
Upgrading a video card on a laptop would require upgrading motherboard, and that's not something I would want to do.
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 04:20 PM   #14
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
Quote:
, but as far as I know the shared memory isn't all that great if you want to game at all, and shared memory on a card such as the 9000 or MX is even less nice.
The MX has dedicated RAM.
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 05:06 PM   #15
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 903
Send a message via AIM to ZeratulsAvenger
Quote:
Originally Posted by kirab
The MX has dedicated RAM.
Hmm... didn't see that. Still, performance on the MX card is not up to par with what I would consider a card worth paying money for, if gaming is wanted. I read somewhere that the MX card should run it, but again I can't say how well. Maybe I am just used to the graphics of newer games that I cannot come to terms with Massively Multiplayer games, which in my experience don't look as nice. I can't speak for the fluidity of the game, as I don't really recall. I know the 5200 slowed down with spells being casted, so imagine that settings would have to be altered to make it perform as well as you want.

PS-The guy also mentioned how weather affects needed to be turned off to run well on the 5200.
ZeratulsAvenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 05:20 PM   #16
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
Would you say fx5200 = r9000 shared ? (both 128MB)

Edit: Where did you find information about the guy with his 5200? Can you give me a link please?

Last edited by kirab; 07-21-2004 at 05:24 PM.
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 07:31 PM   #17
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 903
Send a message via AIM to ZeratulsAvenger
I really couldn't. Just looked at google, something like "MX 440 playing FFXI"
ZeratulsAvenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2004, 11:18 PM   #18
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 205
Yeah, I did that only with "Mobility Radeon 9000 playing FFXI" and the majority of people said they were happy. Doesn't look so bad to me...
kirab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2