|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
08-05-2004, 12:33 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: White Marsh, Maryland
Posts: 30
 |
Is this any good...
I ran 3dMark2002 on my pc last nite (system listed in my sig) are these numbers any good:
CPU = 4061 Mem = 2249 HD = 440 |
|
|
|
08-05-2004, 11:00 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western NY
Posts: 245
 |
Well, that seems to be pretty close to what I got on my 3dMark2002 test. My system is very close to what you have.
I got: CPU: 4063 MEM: 2938 HDD: 986 ~sd ASRock P4M266 / P4 1.8Ghz / 256 MB PC2100 / Sapphire ATI Radeon 9600 128 MB / WD 40gig / Win98SE / 300w PSU |
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 07:09 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: White Marsh, Maryland
Posts: 30
|
I do not understand how you did better on the mem test then I did...I have 512 and you have 256???
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 07:18 AM
|
#4 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,381
|
Twisted385, you have SDRAM in your sig, which has a FSB of 133, while swampdonkey's RAM is running at 266.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 07:39 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: White Marsh, Maryland
Posts: 30
|
Wow...didnt realize how much of a difference it made...
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 11:10 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western NY
Posts: 245
|
Quote:
How is it that you scored 440 with a 60 gig hard drive, and I scored a 986 with my 40 gig? Is it based on free space? BTW, my HD is 7200RPM 2mb cache ~sd Our CPUs were almost identical- even though I have 200 more mhz  
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 11:14 AM
|
#7 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: White Marsh, Maryland
Posts: 30
|
Well that 6.5, I am not sure what rpm it is, but that is the drive i have windows installed on. The 60 gig is 7200rpm and I use it for storage.
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 11:21 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western NY
Posts: 245
|
o thats why...
 ~sd |
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 11:37 AM
|
#9 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,124
|
'Well that 6.5, I am not sure what rpm it is' i'd expect its 5,400rpm
you might see a bit of a performance increase by ditching the 6.5gb hard drive and having windows installed on the 60gb one.. if its not too much hassel. fat32 is faster under general use also. i think searches and defrags and that sort of thing are faster with NTFS thou, and better 'security' if u care. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
