Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Gaming and Benchmarks

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-05-2001, 06:40 PM   #1
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 33
Send a message via ICQ to noblethrasher Send a message via Yahoo to noblethrasher
Question

Quick question, I just bought I Matrox G450 that supposedly has poor 3D performance as it was marketed more for business apps. Now, I do have 512MB of RAM and an AMD 900, so I'm wondering if that can some how compensate for the video cards shortcomings. I've been playing a demo of Star Trek Elite Force and it looks fine with all the video settings maxed out (except resolution@1024x746) but as I'm not much of a gamer, I'm not sure how to appraise the performance
noblethrasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2001, 05:48 AM   #2
Member (13 bit)
 
Xayd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: nowhere.com
Posts: 4,819
Send a message via AIM to Xayd
In a word, yes.

In games that require tons of texture rendering and speed, such as first person shooters (Unreal/Unreal Tournament, Quake, Half Life, etc.) there'll be a noticeable difference in speed if you have a "lesser" video card. But, on the other hand, if you primarily play role playing games and the like which don't require alot of quick rendering by the vid card, you'll be fine as long as you have the RAM and CPU speed that you have now.

Xayd
Xayd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2001, 06:12 AM   #3
RJ
Member (14 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Offenbach/Main (Germany)
Posts: 8,485
Send a message via ICQ to RJ
It will improve game performance, but it won't run at full speed. A weak graphics card slows the CPU down.

I've made that experience:

In former times when I had my Pentium 133, I upgraded my graphics card (2D) to a 3D Card, ATI card with RagePro chip.
There was a performance increase, and the 3D effects were great.
After upgrading to the Pentium II 333 I kept the graphics card. Because of the incredible power of the PII I had a performance increase which satisfied me completely.

But nearly 2 years later, upgrading to the PIII800 there was no performance increase at all !!
In that time I had an ATI card with Rage128 chip from a friend. There were driver problems, but I found a driver that let the card run. Now I had a performance increase that . . well, it was great.
BUT: Just for fun I installed the PII with the same graphics card, and there was LITTLE difference.
In the game Drakan for example, I was able to play at 1024x768 with 15 to 25 fps, no matter whether the PII or PIII was in it. Difference was about 5 fps, I think.
Only then I realized what enormous power the PII had, slowed down all the time and I didn't notice it.
Therefore I decided to buy the GeForce 2 GTS for my PIII (Drakan 1024x768 now with 65 to 70fps), to be sure that this wouldn't happen again.

RJ
__________________
All's right with the world when your PC is working right.
RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2001, 02:01 PM   #4
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 33
Send a message via ICQ to noblethrasher Send a message via Yahoo to noblethrasher
Ok, thanks....
noblethrasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2