|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Rome Total War
tried Rome :Total War yesterday. played for 12 hours . this is just a heads up thread on a very addictive game .. I play lots of games but sessions like that I havent done since Warcraft 3 days. doing all my chores earlie today so I can try and conquer Europe .
the demo is out if ya wanna try it cheers m8s
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ca
Posts: 56
|
Just got this game. To me it was kind of hard to learn the game at first, tutorial was taking too long, everything was a little fuzzy on how to do anything. After about a hour of playing it i started to really get a grip on the game.
It is a very addictive game, although i only played about 2 hours in a row not 12 hehe. If i had the time i would and could easily play for 12 hours though. This game really is unlike any other game i have ever played before. It has a extremly different playing style. In conclusion this game really is great, and worth checking out. The demo is at least worth checking out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
I was looking forward to this game ever since I saw the preview in PC GAMER. Now, I just have to wait till it drops in price to the payable 25 bucks.
__________________
Darum still, füg' ich mich, wie Gott es will. Nun, so will ich wacker streiten, und sollt' ich den Tod erleiden, stirbt ein braver Reitersmann. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
I didn't really like the demo. Kinda slow and boring to me. I have heard really good things about it tho.
__________________
*The command line, an elegant weapon for a more civilized age* |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Lest we forget
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,870
|
I played the demo from PCgamer, it was good but not great. Maybe if I have a army the size they have in the ad it would be better.
__________________
redqueen: Antec Sonata, Pentium-D 2.5GHz, MSI G31M3-L, 2GB ram, 320 GB HDD, OpenBSD hal9000: Lenovo T61, 2GB ram, 120 GB HDD, FreeBSD |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ca
Posts: 56
|
heh yeah, it is really slow at first, but things do pick up prety soon and it starts to become enjoyable by the min., atleast it does for me. So far, for me, it has been one of those games that just gets better and better as you advance.
It is one of those games you don't dare even to load up unless you have a fair amount of time to play it, otherwise your gona be late for class etc. and lose track of time. Plus it takes a lot of time to do anything, its not like say star wars: battlefront where you can load up, play a quick game and exit and be on your way. Last edited by Blue; 10-06-2004 at 11:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Im on a game I started sunday and I only have 6 bases . Theres lots of strategy involved , its not like "the biggest army wins type of game" . My fav units are the wardogs , I grab 2 units of 92 and send them after the infantry units *poof* infantry gone ehhehehe . also once your base has a concrete wall surrounding it , you become virtually inpregnable, Ive repelled armies of well over 1000 with barely 400 guys . Like Blue said you cant just jump into a quick game of this so I dont see why Multiplayer is even worth it.
cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ca
Posts: 56
|
Yeah i havne't tried the multi-player side of this game yet. Not sure hot it will turn out, might be one of those things where you you only play online with close friends rather than people who might ditch the game withen 8 mins of start up.
- i also favor the wardogs, they are fun heh |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 193
|
i dont like the game at all very poor controls and takes to long for the leraning cuvre very diffecult to play
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 24
|
I have the original series of Total War, Shogun, it's fun to play, but I just turn off the real-time war part and only play the strategy board part, not that real-time action isn't good, my old pc can't handle it. My new PC I just built should handle it, but I dont know if it's even compatible with XP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 9
|
The demo suxs, the armies are limited and it last about 6 minutes...lol I want to try to game too, but it was between getting SW Battlefront and that, I chose SW, and it rocks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ca
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
Good choice, i think SW: battlefront is more fun anyways. Unless you have the time for Rome, takes a while heh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Oh I'm so tired! I stayed up till 3am last night playing this game! Talk about addictive. And yes, I was very confused when learning how to play it, but once you get it down, then it's nonstop from there!!! Seriously, I think I have to figure out a way to limit myself, I was late to work yesterday because I had Carthage in seige. I just have to beat this game by Tuesday so I can spend my time on GTA: San Andreas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 1,801
|
STW runs fine on XP, I have all of the TW series, Shogun, Medival and Rome.
STW is still my favorite. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ca
Posts: 56
|
Has anyone tried out the online play with this game? For the first time i just tried to connect for a online battle, but it says that i need a valid gamespy cd code or something like that.
Do i need a subscription to gamespy to play this game online? or am i missing something here? Anyone able to help me out? |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 487
|
I haven't been able to stop playing this game. Once you defeat some of the other factions you can play as carthage, gauls, egypt, and others. The war elephants rock if your Carthage. The demo doesn't give this game justice. I thought Medeval total war was great, but this is 10 times better. They even use the Rome: Total War engine on the history channel for all the old battle scenes. Sucks that it put all those actors out of work though. I like having battles with each side at about 15,000 troops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
Quote:
__________________
My 1st Build: Antec SuperLANboy Case| Antec 480W Neopower| 16X Sony DVD-ROM | Nec 1.44 FDD | WD 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA HDD | Aspire Keyboard w/optical Mouse |Geil Value 1Gig| ASUS P4P800-E Delux Socket 478 | P4 3.2E 800FSB HT | eVGA GeForce 6800GT 256MB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 325
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Medieval: Total War
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/...war/index.html Released in 2002 Score: 8.7 Rome: Total War http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/...war/index.html Released in 2004 Score: 9.1 One is the sequel to the other, in a sense. Both by Creative Assembly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
Those screenshots surely kept me drooling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 487
|
There is also Shogun: Total War. Shogun is the first one. I think it came out in 1999 or 2000.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|