|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Most hardware needful? | |||
| Doom 3 |
|
20 | 46.51% |
| Sims 2 |
|
1 | 2.33% |
| Star Wars Series |
|
1 | 2.33% |
| EverQuest 2 |
|
9 | 20.93% |
| Half-Life 2 |
|
10 | 23.26% |
| Children of the Nile |
|
1 | 2.33% |
| ROME: Total War |
|
3 | 6.98% |
| Far Cry 64 Bit version |
|
12 | 27.91% |
| LOTR Games |
|
2 | 4.65% |
| Spellforce |
|
2 | 4.65% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 249
|
What is the most hardware hungry game out or coming out.
DOOM 3 EverQuest 2 FarCry 64 Bit Version Half-Life 2 Spellforce Sims 2 Star Wars Series LOTR Games Children of the Nile ROME Total War What kind of hardware would you need for these? Enjoy... (Don't worry I'll make a better poll latter on too) Last edited by goodnice; 11-06-2004 at 09:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Quote:
__________________
*The command line, an elegant weapon for a more civilized age* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Everquest 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,381
|
Without a doubt, Doom3. It even surpasses Far Cry.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Soopa Squishy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,175
|
getting Halo to run all on high is something even most top of the line systems stutter doing
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 / EVGA NF68-T1 680i SLI / EVGA 320mb 8800GTS / Western Digital Raptor 74GB / 4x1024 Mushkin eXtreme Performance / OCZ Modstream 520w / Antec P180 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Certified Audio Nut
|
Quote:
__________________
"I'm not lying. I'm writing fiction with my mouth." - Homer Simpson My Miscelaneous Gallery ASUS P7P55D PRO / Intel Core i7 860 / 8GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 RAM / OCZ Vertex 2 120GB SSD / Seagate 1TB 7200.12 / Asus Radeon 5870 1GB / LG Super-Multi 22x SATA DVD-RW / Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit / Cable Modem / HT Omega Striker 7.1 Sound Card / FSP 700W PSU / Logitech MX1000 Wireless Laser Mouse / Asus 24" 16:9 LCD w/Webcam / Axiom Audiobyte 2.1 Speakers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Doom 3. Compared to it, HL2 runs like a breeze on my PC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
HOT ROD
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
|
Doom3 is about the hardest on my system, FarCry puts a little load on high settings, HL2 is moderate, but Halo was a cakewalk.
__________________
Fast enough 2 get by.....old enough 2 know what not 2 try -You know it was me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
|
Quote:
kram
__________________
"For today, goodbye. For tomorrow, good luck. And forever, Go Blue!"
University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
My computer in my signature could barely run that in an 800x600 resolution with med settings. HL2 runs fine at 1600x1200 with anit-aliasing i belive at highest setting. Not sure aobut that tho
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,381
|
Quote:
I have slight lag with halo when in areas with a large number of enemies, and that's with most all of the settings cranked up. Same thing with painkiller. If there are lots of enemies and particle effects, I get some lag. Surprisingly, HL2 seems to put the least amount of stress on my system. Of course, loading time is murder, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: California
Posts: 199
|
Doom 3.
HL2 is a different horse, my system runs that game with no problems with high settings. Love CS source!!!!
__________________
p4s800 asus, p4 2.6 HT 1 gig kingston, Fast enough to run kick ass games! Every morning I give thanks to my creator for another day, another chance to raise some hell, to prove to myself I can do better and to love my darling Daniella |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
HL2 seems to be a very robust game in that it can run on basically any hardware pretty flawlessly. the engine is great a decent FPS (40+) are very attainable by mid range hardware. farcry seems to be a little more CPU dependent then the other games though.
__________________
My 1st Build: Antec SuperLANboy Case| Antec 480W Neopower| 16X Sony DVD-ROM | Nec 1.44 FDD | WD 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA HDD | Aspire Keyboard w/optical Mouse |Geil Value 1Gig| ASUS P4P800-E Delux Socket 478 | P4 3.2E 800FSB HT | eVGA GeForce 6800GT 256MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ca
Posts: 56
|
I voted Everquest 2. Iv heard crazy things about this game how much it takes out of your comp. Friends say its far worse than doom 3. Have not tried out EQ2 myself but i just heard tons about what it takes to run even.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
doom 3, that was made for the 512 vid cards if thet ever come out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 143
|
EQ2 the game was built so that it would not run will all graphics at max settings at current technology. They thought ahead knowing that technology will get better and the game will look just as good when technology catches up with it. Also it uses like 800mb of ram just to run the game without major stuttering in populated zones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Got Privilege?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: IA go Hawks
Posts: 1,257
|
EQ2 is monster on demand. My system with everything off is choppy. Add a 6600GT and get the same results. Trying more RAM next.
__________________
P4 2.8E | 1.5GB ddr400 VR dual channel | Sony CD-R/RW | Windows XP | ATI X1950pro | Viewsonic P95F | Intel D865PERLX | WD 36g Raptor | MCHSI 3mb Cable "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." Pablo Picasso (1881 - 1973) "Absence of proof is not proof of absence." William Cowper (1731 - 1800) Wisdom Speaks: Have in your mind that which would constitute a miracle for you. Get the vision. Suspend disbelief and skepticism. Allow yourself to take the journey toward real magic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
I wouldn't consider Rome Total War right at the bottom, i mean there is a lot of deatail and it takes a lot to render so many units seperately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
I still say 64-bit FarCry... you need a special processor (64-bit) and you need a 6800 Ultra because it's FarCry!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maine
Posts: 424
|
I would have to say EQ II
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
DooM 3
DooM 3 uses almost all dynamic lighting while HL2 and other games use mostly static lighting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Blizzard Fanboy
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northrend
Posts: 1,411
|
Doom 3 - I was reading about the reason it's so dark is because of the dynamic lighting. The lighting system is so hardware intensive they can only have a couple dynamic lights in any one area with today's hardware. I guess they chose a good dynamic lighting system that can't even be used to it's full potential, over a crappy static lighting system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Lest we forget
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,870
|
Doom3 runs alot smoother on my system than HL2. It almost never lags while when i play HL2 if there is alot of action it starts to slow down quite bit, even more than doom3 on ultra setting.
__________________
redqueen: Antec Sonata, Pentium-D 2.5GHz, MSI G31M3-L, 2GB ram, 320 GB HDD, OpenBSD hal9000: Lenovo T61, 2GB ram, 120 GB HDD, FreeBSD |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Ive played half of thoses games and Doom3 was the worst on my system, Rome Total War in the end when I had huge armies attacking was pretty choppy at times too.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|