|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 233
|
Resolution for gaming
hey guys i was just wondering if there is a "standard" for a resolution for video games. like 1280x720. is it pretty much given that the higher the resolution the nicer the graphics? i was just toying around with it and i was hoping for some input.
thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
i usually only like the "square" sized proportions, 800x600, 1280x1024, and sometimes 1280x768. i wish i could use 1600x1200 but my monitor doesn't support that far. i usually play at 1280x1024 and i don't see frame increases when i go lower.
__________________
My 1st Build: Antec SuperLANboy Case| Antec 480W Neopower| 16X Sony DVD-ROM | Nec 1.44 FDD | WD 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA HDD | Aspire Keyboard w/optical Mouse |Geil Value 1Gig| ASUS P4P800-E Delux Socket 478 | P4 3.2E 800FSB HT | eVGA GeForce 6800GT 256MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Since I've had my 6800GT I've been playing all my games at 1600x1200. Going that high you usually don't need AA and everything looks great. In Far Cry I tried a lower resol. but the trees looked like crap, so I upped the resol. and made all the trees fully drawn in the distance (forget the code for it) and Far Cry rocks.
But in multiplayer it's a differ story. It is really hard to see what ppl type in Raven Shield Multi!
__________________
*The command line, an elegant weapon for a more civilized age* |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Soopa Squishy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,175
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for the original question, I play most games at 1064x768 except for UT2k4 which I play at 1280x1024. I prefer to crank all the other effects to the highest level and adjust my resolution to get a better framerate instead of having high rez and low settings.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6420 / EVGA NF68-T1 680i SLI / EVGA 320mb 8800GTS / Western Digital Raptor 74GB / 4x1024 Mushkin eXtreme Performance / OCZ Modstream 520w / Antec P180 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,381
|
I've always used 1024x768 in all the games I play. Seems to be the sweet spot.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
I usually use 1024x768 because I don't want to torture my CRT, but then I put all the goodies on high and crank up FSAA and AF all the way.
__________________
Desktop | Antec Performance Plus 1080AMG | Antec 430W PSU | Intel D875PBZ | Intel P4 3.0C | | 4x512 MB dual-channel DDR400 Kingston HyperX | ATI Radeon 9800 pro 256 MB | Creative Sound Blaster Audigy Gamer | | LiteOn DVD-ROM | LiteOn CDRW | 36 GB WD Raptor | 250 GB WD SATA2 | Sony Floppy | XP pro | |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Forcing resolutions the monitor can't render, either with windows or some 3rd party app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,381
|
Each monitor has its limits. You can't "OC" them, per say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
no, i mean my monitor can't support over 1280x1024. like my nVidia drivers allow me to go up to 2048x1536 but anything over 1280x1024 and my monitor gives me the resolution not supported message and everything goes black.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|