|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
01-09-2005, 10:27 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 125
|
HD Benchmark Scores
Lo Peeps!
I have the following setup: 1x Seagate 80Gb using Serillel2 to connect to the RAID header on my mobo 2x Partitions: C/ 10Gb using FAT32 and D/ 70Gb using NTFS I ran the HD Tach benchmark on my PC and came up with the following scores: Burst speed: 74.3MB/s Average Read: 40.4MB/s I was wondering what results if any other people have had and whether mine seems low (it does to me but I'm no expert!). HD Tach can be found here: http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public...request=HdTach J 
Last edited by Jolyonekenobi; 01-09-2005 at 10:32 AM. Reason: Further info |
|
|
|
01-09-2005, 10:47 AM
|
#2 |
|
HOT ROD
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
|
WD 360GD SATA Raptor
103mb burts speed 49.5mb average speed
__________________
Fast enough 2 get by.....old enough 2 know what not 2 try -You know it was me
|
|
|
|
|
01-09-2005, 11:45 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 174
|
excelstore 80G ATA
3 partitions ntfs and fat 32 64.9md burst speed 48.8mb average speed WD 40G ATA 32.3mb burst speed 29mb average speed an old wreck for backup Last edited by amose; 01-09-2005 at 11:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
01-09-2005, 08:15 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
Both Maxtors, Diamond Max 9, used HDTach v2.7:
On IDE channel: ~~~~~~~~~~ read burst 111.8MB/s read max 51.1MB/s read min 27.1MB/s read avg 41.5MB/s On PCI adaptor card: ~~~~~~~~~~~~ read burst 108.9MB/s read max 49.6MB/s read min 26.0MB/s read avg 40.5MB/s Haven't done the SATA drive yet... |
|
|
|
|
01-09-2005, 08:29 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
WD raptor 74GB
burst Speed: 120.2 MB/Sec max speed: 71MB/sec min speed: 20.1 MB/sec avg speed: 59.6 MB/sec
__________________
My 1st Build: Antec SuperLANboy Case| Antec 480W Neopower| 16X Sony DVD-ROM | Nec 1.44 FDD | WD 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA HDD | Aspire Keyboard w/optical Mouse |Geil Value 1Gig| ASUS P4P800-E Delux Socket 478 | P4 3.2E 800FSB HT | eVGA GeForce 6800GT 256MB |
|
|
|
|
01-09-2005, 11:17 PM
|
#6 |
|
Blizzard Fanboy
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northrend
Posts: 1,411
|
WD Raptor 36GB
Burst - 115.8 MB/s Average - 58.1 MB/s Random Access - 8.0ms WD Caviar 120GB Burst - 77.4 MB/s Average - 45.4 MB/s Random Access - 12.8ms
__________________
EVGA 750i SLI - EVGA 9800 GX2 - Intel Q6700 - 4GB Corsair PC6400 - 1TB Seagate HDD - X-fi Gamer - Logitech G51 5.1 - ViewSonic 22" WS - Vista Premium |
|
|
|
|
01-10-2005, 12:00 AM
|
#7 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,340
  |
WD Raptor 36GB
Burst - 102.2 MB/s Average - 49.6 MB/s Random Access - 8.8ms WD 160GB JB Burst - 75.8 MB/s Average - 48.6 MB/s Random Access - 14.1ms Seagate 80 GB ST380817AS Burst - 128.9 MB/s Average - 48.3 MB/s Random Access - 12.7ms My raptor seems a bit slow :/
__________________
Main: ASUS P5k SE/Core 2 Duo E6550/4x1024mb DDR2 800 GeForce 8600 GT 256MB/WD 36.7GB Raptor - WD 320GB x2 - WD - 750GB x2 - WD 640GB Laptop: Acer Aspire One AOA150 945GSE/Atom N270/1024mb DDR2 533/8.9" WSVGA/120GB HDD/2.3 lbs. HTPC: Shuttle K48 945GC/Pentium E2180/2x1024mb DDR2 800/80GB HDD/Vizio V37L 37" LCD 1080i Join us in the pcmech irc channel on undernet #Pcmech. |
|
|
|
|
01-10-2005, 12:11 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ma.
Posts: 319
|
WDC WD740GD Raptor 74gb
 116.9 max 63.7 avg Regards...........................Sterling
|
|
|
|
|
01-10-2005, 12:23 AM
|
#9 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ma.
Posts: 319
|
Say, question, if I have folding@home running in the background will that affect my score?????
Thanks..................Sterling 36gb Raptor 117.9 high 63.3 avg 7.9ms seek time Last edited by sataraid0; 01-10-2005 at 12:25 AM. Reason: more info |
|
|
|
|
01-10-2005, 01:51 PM
|
#10 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 125
|
I don't know enough about it to be certain to be honest mate - I thought the idea was that F@H only uses available resources. With that in mind then I would have thought that under a stress-test it would either stop using resources or use very little. That said, I really don't know much about it.
My score doesn't seem to be that low in comparison to other people scores with similar set-ups. I thought that PATA drives were supposed to be rated at 100Mb/s and SATA at 150Mb/s?! I know that this is mainly at burst speed and very rarely achieved at "real" usage levels but surely it should be higher than 40% of rated?! J 
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
