Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Gaming and Benchmarks

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Like Tree1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-15-2006, 03:11 PM   #61
Computer Geek
 
ConLog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Lothian, SCOTLAND, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by porky
lo ppl....

3d mark 03: 19,000(rounded off)
3D mark 05: 9,000(rounded off)

AMD4000+
XFX7800GTX
4GB DDR400 ram
700W PSU
audigy 2

that good?
Porky, what result do you get for 3D Mark 01?
__________________
ASUS P5Q PRO Turbo Mainboard Intel Core 2 Quad 9550 Processor 4GB DDR2 PC6400 RAM in DC Mode XTX ATI 5770 1GB Graphics WD 160GB SATA Samsung 160GB SATA Sony +/-DVDRW LG +/-DVDRW MS Wireless Optical Mouse 2.0 MS Keyboard 24" ACER Widescreen LCD Monitor Linux Mint 11 Epson PX720WD All-In-One
Lenovo S205 Netbook PC LG External Slimline USB DVD-ReWriter Windows 7 HP
ConLog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 02:58 PM   #62
V12
 
Mr.Ferrari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, T.E.X.A.S
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via AIM to Mr.Ferrari
3dMark05: EDIT: 5066 with the rig in my sig. Stock Card

SuperPI: 39s
__________________
“We must not let ourselves get driven off course, no matter what happens we must stick to our natural game”
-Zenedine Zidane

Last edited by Mr.Ferrari; 01-23-2006 at 11:39 PM.
Mr.Ferrari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2006, 08:18 PM   #63
~ Ryan ~
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
Send a message via AIM to rspassey Send a message via MSN to rspassey
Just re-ran 3D Mark 05.... got a score of 8077 (my highest so far). This is with the rig in my sig, and I am running with the latest SLI drivers.
__________________
RiotCats.com, an internet domain specifically fabricated and visually erected for the appreciation of the feline kingdom!
rspassey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2006, 09:43 PM   #64
jfk
Member (11 bit)
 
jfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
My best now, with Cat 5.11 drivers in my sig rig, is 7203 on 3DMark05. Finally got that old technology X850XTPE through the 7200 mark that had been holding me back.
__________________
DFI Infinity 975X/G, Intel C2D E6600 (@3.4Ghz), 2 Gb DDR2 800 GSkill HZ, Powercolor X1900XT, 74 Gb Raptor SATA, 250 Gb Seagate SATA, Audigy 2 ZS, FSP Epsilon 600 watt PSU, NEC 3540 DVD-RW, ASUS DVD ROM, Thermalright SI-128, Thermalright HR-05, Lian Li PC65 case, Samsung 940B 19" LCD
jfk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2006, 03:42 PM   #65
just a tech
 
ssahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: central valley CA
Posts: 1,421
3354 3dmark05

ASUS A7N8X-E Deluxe
Athlon XP 3000+ 400MHz FSB
1GB DDR400 RAM PC 3200 CAS 2.5
80GB WD SATA 7200rpm 8MB cache
GeForce 6600GT 128MB AGP

thats up about 300 from last score with old 768MB CAS 3 RAM
ssahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2006, 05:48 PM   #66
V12
 
Mr.Ferrari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, T.E.X.A.S
Posts: 3,488
Send a message via AIM to Mr.Ferrari
Ran 3dmark with my new card and got a new score of 6100.
Mr.Ferrari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 09:05 PM   #67
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 379
I have a question.. on 3dmark05, why do I get such a low score on the CPU scores? And it lags unbelievablely, can someone explain thanks.

AMD4000+
EVGA 7800GT

Both stock.

7432 3Dmark05 score
FireByyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 09:27 PM   #68
Wx geek
 
blue60007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
The CPU test will lag no matter what CPU you have...even if you had a therotical FX-90 or whatever, it'll still lag badly. CPUs are horribly inneffecient at rendering the images, so it's going to be slow.
__________________
"It is the way of man to make monsters and it is the nature of monsters to destroy their makers."
blue60007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 10:02 PM   #69
~ Ryan ~
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
Send a message via AIM to rspassey Send a message via MSN to rspassey
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireByyrd
I have a question.. on 3dmark05, why do I get such a low score on the CPU scores? And it lags unbelievablely, can someone explain thanks.

AMD4000+
EVGA 7800GT

Both stock.

7432 3Dmark05 score
When testing the CPU, the video cards *aren't* used. Thus, the CPU does all the work, and like blue said - the CPU plain out sucks at rendering images - if it did a better job, then there wouldn't be a need for video cards.
rspassey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 05:52 PM   #70
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 379
Ah, understood :P
FireByyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2006, 07:42 PM   #71
Member (10 bit)
 
Spearball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 670
Here are my scores. No overclocking.

Is this a normal result in aquamark 3? 82406
3DMark2000: 29067
3DMark 05: 9453
3DMark 06: 4784

For super pi i got 34.

What do you guys think?
Spearball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 01:58 AM   #72
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 57
NEWB with NEW SYSTEM

Hi guys. I just got my first build going and did my first benchmarking. Let me know what you think. No overclocking, or tweeks of any kind.

3Dmark05

8306 Game Tests
5025 CPU Tests

AMD Athlon 64 3700 San Diego
2x 1 gig Corsair Value Select (2 gig total) memory
EVGA 7800GTX KO Edition (only 1)
Asus A8n32 Motherboard

bla bla bla.
A-TECH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 01:59 AM   #73
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 57
BTW, are there any tweeks or setting I should look into on a new system build? Bios? I'm a total newb, and don't know squat about this stuff yet.

Thanks.
A-TECH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 07:03 AM   #74
Member (7 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 114
reran 35mark05 got 4935. in my opinion tahts pretty low...
kingsownall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 04:10 PM   #75
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 379
A-TECH, I would defintely not reccomend you to tweak your settings such as overclocking because your computer is at the high end standard, and really... theres no reason for you to do so. Unless you play the overclocking game, then go ahead, but what I hear is your not too sure about it, so I'll reccomend you not to start :P your cpu is fine the way it is.
FireByyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 04:15 PM   #76
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 379
To be a hypocrite... I've overclocked my ATI 9700 PRO stock 325mhz to 475... before

It was sorta stable too, played Doom 3 on high settings... But then it crashed and my whole computer exploded in flames.

No im joking, but it had VPU recover... Played for 4 hours.
FireByyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 10:18 AM   #77
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireByyrd
A-TECH, I would defintely not reccomend you to tweak your settings such as overclocking because your computer is at the high end standard, and really... theres no reason for you to do so. Unless you play the overclocking game, then go ahead, but what I hear is your not too sure about it, so I'll reccomend you not to start :P your cpu is fine the way it is.
No, I have no desire to overclock anything. I'm just curious to know if there is anything I should do when a new computer is put together, other than just install the drivers, which is all I've done. It's my first build, and I'm not very knowledgeable about all the tech stuff.

On auto detect w/ Doom 3, it puts it at high setting. I've been playing it on ULTRA, added some anti-aliasing, and it runs it fine for hours.
It says it requires 512 MB of memory (video card memory?), but my card is only a 256. My RAM is 2 gig, so does it use some of the system RAM in this case? It runs fine, though, no problems.

Thanks.
A-TECH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 03:30 PM   #78
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 379
Yeah, they say that, but the truth is it doesn't really matter. However there might be "texture thrashing"... which I played ultra and beat the game, I didn't notice any thrashing at all. So its up to you, but it won't hurt the card or anything if thats what your worried about.

By system ram you mean the 2GBs ? Yeah, of course it will use it.
FireByyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 03:32 PM   #79
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
thefultonhow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,935
Send a message via AIM to thefultonhow
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireByyrd
By system ram you mean the 2GBs ? Yeah, of course it will use it.
For the video card? Probably not. IIRC Doom III needs 128 MB of video RAM.
__________________
Computer: Intel Core i5-750 2.66 GHz quad-core processor @ 3.71 GHz | Asus P7P55D-E motherboard | Crucial 4 GB DDR3-1333 RAM | nVidia GeForce 8600GT | 2x WD Caviar Black WD1501FASS 1.5TB hard drives in RAID 1 | Antec Sonata III case with Antec EarthWatts 500-watt PSU | Dual Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP 24" widescreens | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Other: 2005 Subaru Legacy 2.5GT sedan 5MT | Samsung Epic 4G Smartphone | Mamiya M645 1000S medium-format SLR with 55mm f/2.8, 70mm f/2.8, 210mm f/4, teleconverter, 120 and 220 film backs | Olympus E-PL1 Micro-4/3s DSLR with 14-42mm and 40-150mm lenses
thefultonhow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2006, 03:59 PM   #80
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 379
Oh sorry, I meant by Doom 3 using the RAM like "stick" as for processing.
FireByyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 07:46 PM   #81
Member (10 bit)
 
Propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,012
Send a message via MSN to Propain Send a message via Yahoo to Propain
3dmark06 scored 121

2500+
9800pro
1.5gigpc3200
__________________
3.40 AMD Phenom II X4 965--4G OCZ DDR3---Asus 5770 ATI Radeon----INTEL 78G SSD drive
Propain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 08:27 PM   #82
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 57
3DMark06

4035

Good?
A-TECH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 10:44 PM   #83
jfk
Member (11 bit)
 
jfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-TECH
3DMark06

4035

Good?
Yep, that's a good score. Congratulations.
jfk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 11:09 PM   #84
Member (6 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfk
Yep, that's a good score. Congratulations.
Thanks. Looking at other people's scores via the futuremark site, there are several systems that look to have the same guts as mine, but they score a lot better.
Does the system specs they list tell if the system is running in SLI? All I see is one card listed on all of the systems.
A-TECH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 09:04 PM   #85
Member (10 bit)
 
Propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,012
Send a message via MSN to Propain Send a message via Yahoo to Propain
ok got 5668 going to turn off that AA and AF stuff later and OC sum and let yall know the results.

cheers

edit: played with some settings and got it to 6148 and Super Pi at 1M was 40.359s

Last edited by Propain; 02-12-2006 at 08:48 AM.
Propain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 08:37 PM   #86
jfk
Member (11 bit)
 
jfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
Oh yeah! New video card (X1900XT) and new scores. These are first run, with new drivers that aren't totally optimized, and no overclocks on the vid card (CPU is at 2.4Ghz). I think I'm gonna love this card.

3DMark05=9367
3DMark06=4791
jfk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2006, 02:45 PM   #87
jfk
Member (11 bit)
 
jfk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
Well, with a slight 10Mhz increase in core and memory, I'm up to:

3DMark05=10,217
3DMark06=5,409

Hopefully, once the card breaks in I can clock it up to XTX levels and push both the 11,000 and 6,000 levels for each test respectively. Woot!!!!
jfk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2006, 03:58 PM   #88
Member (7 bit)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 114
omfg. nice score. *jump and faints. too bad the cards dam expensive rofl.
kingsownall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2006, 01:02 PM   #89
just a tech
 
ssahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: central valley CA
Posts: 1,421
just got a new GeForce 7800GS
3Dmark05 7184
not bad for an old athlon XP cpu and an agp video card
more then double what I scored with my GeForce 6600GT
ssahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2006, 01:32 AM   #90
Member (5 bit)
 
Grater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19
Send a message via MSN to Grater
3Dmark06 - 4068
3Dmark05 - 7658
3Dmark03 - 15828
3Dmark01 - 25066
Aquamark3 - 76,590
Super Pi to 1m - 37 seconds

Not bad for the first PC I built. ^^
Grater is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1