Your Rig's Benchmark Scores

[Mr.Ferrari]

Well i just got my new card i have did a run few days ago but it was on the crappy old drivers that came on the cd, ill run it again on my new 6.3s. But so far the scores with 3dmark05 are 8020 with cpu at 3.6ghz.

Superpi: 34s with cpu at 3.83ghz.

shweet its faster then a fx-57 lol.

[David M]

Originally Posted by Mr.Ferrari Superpi: 34s with cpu at 3.83ghz. shweet its faster then a fx-57 lol.

?

I have 28.485 in Super Pi. I wonder if any dual cores have beat this?

[ne0g]

either the fan on my graphics card is broken or it just sucks because i got a 89 on 3dmark06 and my comp just chugged along with less than a frame per second whats going on?

[jfk]

Originally Posted by ne0g either the fan on my graphics card is broken or it just sucks because i got a 89 on 3dmark06 and my comp just chugged along with less than a frame per second whats going on?

Neither. Given the vid card and CPU you run, this is probably an actual score. Your PC could'nt run over half the tests due to your old video card, and the CPU portion of the test brings even dual core CPU's to their knees.

[Mr.Ferrari]

Originally Posted by David M ? I have 28.485 in Super Pi. I wonder if any dual cores have beat this?

http://forum.pcmech.com/showthread.php?t=142367

Er..i was referring to that thread..and it says that FX-57 2.814ghz, 35.125 seconds...

Awesome pi time btw!

[tescularcyclops]

I was wondering if my scores were good? All thes games are set at the same screen resolution od 1024x768.
Need for speed most wanted :all settings maxed avg.50fps
Call of duty 2 all settings maxed avg. 45fps
FEAR all settings maxed avg. 90fps
Quake4 with fraps is capped at 60fps, but using the timedemo comand in the console it gave mr 115fps
3dmarks06 i got 4216

my system:
amd 64 x2 4200+
2gigs ram
evga 7800 gt
evga nforce4 sli mother board

[kingsownall]

foi brought a zalman fata1lity vga cooler. overclocked my core only by 10mhz and that was pretty much the cores limit for sum reason. my 3dmark05 score was 5048

[Parker03GT]

3D Mark 06 Score - 4807
PCMark 05 Score - 5470

I guess they're good scores, dunno.

[jfk]

Originally Posted by Parker03GT 3D Mark 06 Score - 4807 PCMark 05 Score - 5470 I guess they're good scores, dunno.

Hmmm, I would expect a better 05 score with your 7900GT. Seems that card should be at least up in the 8000's given the rest of your hardware. It's not one of those cards that is underclocking itself is it?

[Parker03GT]

Originally Posted by jfk Hmmm, I would expect a better 05 score with your 7900GT. Seems that card should be at least up in the 8000's given the rest of your hardware. It's not one of those cards that is underclocking itself is it?

I hope it's not underclocking itself. I don't do any of that overclocking so what I install is what I get. I added all of my benchmark tests to my sig if that helps. They're all done in default settings.

[Panama Red]

Originally Posted by jfk Hmmm, I would expect a better 05 score with your 7900GT. Seems that card should be at least up in the 8000's given the rest of your hardware. It's not one of those cards that is underclocking itself is it?

It has been my understanding that PC Mark scores the entire system and is more cpu and memory dependent. 3D Mark scores the video. A high performance vid card wouldn't affect the PC Mark score that much but it would increase the 3D Mark score. At least that's what I've been lead to believe.

[jfk]

Originally Posted by Panama Red It has been my understanding that PC Mark scores the entire system and is more cpu and memory dependent. 3D Mark scores the video. A high performance vid card wouldn't affect the PC Mark score that much but it would increase the 3D Mark score. At least that's what I've been lead to believe.

Duh. Reading is fundamental. Next time I'll try to read for more detail. You are correct PR, my bad. I was "seeing" 3DMark05 while I was READING PCMark05.

[ssahl]

just ran 3dmark06 without changing any system settings got
3130

Athlon XP 3000+ 400MHz FSB
Asus A7N8X-E
1.25GB PC3200 RAM
GeForce 7800GS 256MB AGPx8
80GB SATA 7200rpm 8MB cache hdd

nothing overclocked, will mess with some video settings and try again see if I can get it a little higher,

not to bad for a non 64bit AMD cpu and an AGP video card

[maomatt]

My 1st build, nothing overclocked. Run after a clean XP install

3DMark03 - 29545
3DMark06 - 7527

not too shabby!

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Toledo Dual Core Processor
XFX GeForce 7900 GT / 256MB X2 in SLI
2048 MB Kingston DDR 400 (PC 3200)
BIOSTAR TForce4SLI
Western Digital 320GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s X2
Antec TRUEPOWERII TPII-550 ATX12V 550W Power Supply
Antec Performance I P180 case

[ToyotaSupra]

3DMark06 - 5300 (Rounded)

PC in sig.

[A-TECH]

My 7900GTX will eventually get to me, so I can compare it to my current 7800 GTX KO.

[freesafety13]

i scored a 6176 on 3dwatermark05 and a 37 on superpi 1m. i also scored in the 4000's on watermark05 cpu.

i have an amd 64 3700+ sandiego
2gb of kingston dual channel ram with a timing of 3-3-3-8, for more stability
and an ati x850xt.
none of it is oc'ed yet, but i am considering oc'ing the graphics card.

[freesafety13]

Originally Posted by freesafety13 i scored a 6176 on 3dwatermark05 and a 37 on superpi 1m. i also scored in the 4000's on watermark05 cpu. i have an amd 64 3700+ sandiego 2gb of kingston dual channel ram with a timing of 3-3-3-8, for more stability and an ati x850xt. none of it is oc'ed yet, but i am considering oc'ing the graphics card.

just oc'ed the graphics card to 579mhz core and 618mhz memory and scored a 6846 on 3dwatermark05. by the way my temps on the card is currently at 40 idle and 60 under heavy load. later

[kingsownall]

wow. thats nice. doesnt the x850 pro and xt version share the same core, except that xt runs on 16 pipes while the pro runs on 12. i wonder if ur still using stock cooling. cause u got ur core up to 579 and my cores at 530 and im using a aftermark market cooling part. do u think software prevents it from coming and higher or just the hardware itself. maybe thats y i get so little performance in bf2

[hagatha]

Help out a wana-be. I used 3dmark05 and Aquamark3 for these numbers, is it that, the higher the number the better? This is right out of the box, no OC'ing

3dmark05: 8827
Aquamark3: 87.583 fps
SuperPi 1m: 36sec

[blue60007]

Yes, higher is better on the first two. Anything dealing with time (like SuperPi), less time is better.

[jeromebrill]

3DMark05: 5636
AquaMark3: 63,877

For tests I down clocked my CPU to 3.2GHz instead of 3.4GHz. Wanted it to be a little more stable for tests.

[Rolandooo]

3dmark05 - 8024

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...1/3dmark05.jpg

Not sure how well that is. One of my first benchmarks yet. ill try some more later on down the road.

Not overclocked same comp thats in my sig

[DemonSX]

3DMark06 - 4167

Is that worth anything? PC in signature.

[A-TECH]

Originally Posted by A-TECH 3DMark06 4035 Good?

I just got my 7950 GX2 and came up with 5702 for my new score. Whatcha think? I think I got it all set up right, just plugged it in, installed drivers, and let it rip.

[Foosa]

Got some numbers for you guys

super pi 1m- 21 sec.
3dmark06- 5056

[BrokenKingdom]

Super Pi = 38 seconds to 1M :/
Aquamark = 78,251
3dmark03 = 15,845
3dmark05 = 7,642

These any good?

~
Optetron 148 (OCed at 2.5)
eVega 7800GT
1Gb Corsair ddr (paired)
ASUS A8N5X mobo
Antec 550 sli PSU

[gherkin]

Mine is amazing, although ran it when I had 512mb system memory

193!!!!!

It was done using the 3DMarks which had Wings of Fury in it

[12twelve12]

Just took out my old Geforce 6600 256mb card and put in a new Geforce 7900GS 256mb (woot.com $140) and my 3DMark05 score went from 2,446 to 8,125...not a bad upgrade for the price.

MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum (non-sli) mobo
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Kingston Hyper-X 1GB (2 x 512) dual channel
MSI Geforce 7900GS 256mb w/ a Zalman VF900 cooler
Xclio 450w PSU
Win XP Pro

[Foosa]

I got 18.266 super pi just playing with the ai booster that came with my motherboard. After that i turned it all back to normal.