|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
01-30-2007, 08:50 PM
|
#151 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 22
|
Just built a new PC - Core 2 Duo e6600, ASUS P5B, 2GB DDR pc-800, EVGA 7600GT
Aquamark v3.0: -GFX 14,328 -CPU 14,427 ------------------ 95,760 3Dmark01 - 30400 3dmark06 - 3314 3dmark05 - 6097 3DMarks, 9318 CPUMarks |
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 09:36 PM
|
#152 | |
|
digitally confused
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,303
 |
Quote:
__________________
. Pentium D 805 | ASUS P5L-MX | CORSAIR ValueSelect 2 GHz |Primary HDD WD 40GB Back up HDD Seagate 7200.10 250GB SATA | eVGA 7600gt | Creative X-Fi Extreme Music audio card | Hauppauge TV Tuner Card | Lite On DVD burner/ LightScribe | COOLER MASTER Case | Fortron ATX400-PA 400W Power Supply | ViewSonic Q19wb LCD |
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2007, 09:45 PM
|
#153 |
|
Kickin' it
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 7,724
|
For the record, the CPU test is supposed to have low framerates. In that test, 3DMark is using the CPU entirely to render the images, not the video card. Since the CPU is not designed for that kind of intense work, the way the GPU is, framerates fall into the single digits on any rig.
__________________
Fold for PCMech: Team 13761 |
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 01:07 AM
|
#154 |
|
digitally confused
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,303
|
Upgrading vid card to 7900 GT
On eVGA 7600 GT
3DMark Score 2457 3DMarks SM 2.0 Score 1184 Marks SM 3.0 Score 1156 Marks CPU Score 515 Marks http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...=0&UID=7787609 EDIT: This sucks. Post installation of 7900 GT 3Dmark Score 2157 Grrrr... This card is known to have issues, but jeez! Last edited by TimPoet; 01-31-2007 at 03:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
02-09-2007, 02:20 PM
|
#155 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 15
|
Aquamark v3.0
GFX - 13,494 CPU - 10,683 Total - 82,699 PCMark05 - 4566 3DMark05 GPU - 9901 CPU - 5314 Not sure how good those scores are for my system. |
|
|
|
|
02-20-2007, 04:05 AM
|
#156 |
|
just a tech
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: central valley CA
Posts: 1,421
|
3Dmark 2001 26426
Super PI 31.687s [1M] not quite what I would of hoped for after finishing new build, but still not bad for an AGP video card system |
|
|
|
|
03-06-2007, 05:46 PM
|
#157 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13
|
SuperPi...
 1 Million - <0 seconds 2 Million - 1 second 4 Million - 4 seconds 8 Million - 9 seconds 16 Million - 20 seconds 32 Million - 45 seconds I'm impressed, since I can't even run Half-Life 2 on the lowest settings at full speed. 
|
|
|
|
|
03-07-2007, 02:56 PM
|
#158 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Maui
Posts: 93
 |
I'd like to see a processor for a desktop PC that can do 1M superpi in less then 0 seconds.
My OC'd E6600 gets 11 seconds for 1 million. 3dMark05 score : 18566 (with The Titan) |
|
|
|
|
03-11-2007, 11:26 PM
|
#159 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: eastern nc
Posts: 1,349
|
Super Pi (1M) - 26.0
3D Mark 06 - 5663 Guess it's ok.
__________________
DFI LP LT X48-E8600-Thermalright HR01 Plus-GeIL Esoteria PC2 6400-Sapphire HD3870 Xfire-Seagate Barracuda Drives-Antec P182-XP Pro
ASUS P5Q Deluxe-Q6700-TRUE BE-Noctua Fan-Corsair Dominator C5DF-Sapphire HD4870T-WD Black Drives-CM690-Windows 7 - powered by PC POWER & COOLING - |
|
|
|
|
03-14-2007, 01:48 AM
|
#160 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 92
|
Super PI
1M at 28s unfortunately 3dmark06 didnt like XP 64. oh well Im real happy with my rig. |
|
|
|
|
03-22-2007, 07:48 PM
|
#161 | |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-22-2007, 07:58 PM
|
#162 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,935
|
Since laptop processors are slower than desktop processors, that makes it even more unlikely.
__________________
Computer: Intel Core i5-750 2.66 GHz quad-core processor @ 3.71 GHz | Asus P7P55D-E motherboard | Crucial 4 GB DDR3-1333 RAM | nVidia GeForce 8600GT | 2x WD Caviar Black WD1501FASS 1.5TB hard drives in RAID 1 | Antec Sonata III case with Antec EarthWatts 500-watt PSU | Dual Dell UltraSharp 2408WFP 24" widescreens | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Other: 2005 Subaru Legacy 2.5GT sedan 5MT | Samsung Epic 4G Smartphone | Mamiya M645 1000S medium-format SLR with 55mm f/2.8, 70mm f/2.8, 210mm f/4, teleconverter, 120 and 220 film backs | Olympus E-PL1 Micro-4/3s DSLR with 14-42mm and 40-150mm lenses |
|
|
|
|
04-11-2007, 09:53 AM
|
#163 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 692
|
on the office PC
SuperPI 128k- 6sec 512k- 35sec 1m- 1 min 26 sec specs... XP Sp2 P4 2.4, 2.39GHz 512mb ram
__________________
Lanner ASUS P5B-VM / Conroe E6600 / 2gig Corsair ram / 250gig WD / HX520 psu / EVGA 8800GTS / Lite-On DVD Burner / Thermaltake LANBOX LITE / XP Pro |
|
|
|
|
05-07-2007, 08:56 PM
|
#164 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 102
|
This thread needed a pick me up from the dead. Bone stock set up with out any enhancement tweaks. I imagine someone will post an overclocked 88 in SLI......
http://s10.picshome.com/6a2/cropped_2.jpg Last edited by thefultonhow; 05-08-2007 at 09:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
05-08-2007, 09:42 AM
|
#165 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,935
|
VideoQuasar, I converted your inline image to a link. There's a maximum inline image size of 800x600, and even then we prefer that people link to their images rather than posting them.
Just a heads up. |
|
|
|
|
05-08-2007, 08:08 PM
|
#166 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 135
|
Don't know if this is any good or not, don't know if it should be higher.
3dmark 06 = 5320 Aquamark v.3 = 102,152 Here's what I'm running: AMD X2 5400+ 2.8Ghz M2N SLI Deluxe mobo 2GB G.Skill Ram EVGA GeForce 8600 GTS |
|
|
|
|
05-08-2007, 08:30 PM
|
#167 | |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
Any suggestions for a benchie to run and I will do what I can to do it...just for fun if anyone would be interested. Bone stock build fun I figure. Here is my Cinebench 9.5 benchie. This one was important to me because I like to fiddle with 3D content creation. http://s10.picshome.com/view.php?ima...ch_cropped.png Last edited by VideoQuasar; 05-08-2007 at 10:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2007, 10:19 PM
|
#168 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 150
|
3700+ San Diego @2904 Mhz
7900 GT CO @5 64/1750 4x512 Corsair VS on the 333 divider @ 207Mhz 31 sec to 1M 5461 3Dmark06
__________________
Main: GIGABYTE GA-MA790GP-DS4H|AMD Athlon X2 4850e 2.5GHz cooled by a fanless Scythe Ninja Mini|A-DATA (2 x1GB) DDR2 800|ATI HD 3300 Onboard via HDMI|NEC-3550A burner|Sony DVD drive|1x1TB WD Black|5x1TB WD Green|SeaSonic M12II SS-430GM 430W|Silverstone LC 17 case|Vista Business SP1|3 x HVR-2250|USB-UIRT with Harmony 670 remote|SageTV 6.6.1|50" Sony SXRD LCOS Bedroom: SageTV HD100 media extender via HDMI to 37" LG LC7D (720p) and Harmony 659 remote |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2007, 02:28 PM
|
#169 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maryland, US of A
Posts: 12
|
heres what i ran on my new pc just built a month ago..
3dmark06-8988  Score: 8988 Date: 2007-05-30 CPU: Intel Core 2 2759 MHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 108 MHz / 310 MHz OS: Microsoft Windows XP Res: 1280x1024 |
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 02:33 PM
|
#170 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 219
|
3dMark06=I GET 8572 ON VISTA-I lose like 10-fps
|
|
|
|
|
06-23-2007, 09:50 PM
|
#171 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 219
|
UPDATE: Same setup, but optimized>(aero off...many other things)
3dMark06': 8640 3dMarks still on vista |
|
|
|
|
07-19-2007, 08:45 AM
|
#172 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 78
|
My rig - Core 2 Duo E6600, ASUS P5B, 2GB DDR2, 8800 GTS 320 MB
AquaMark 3 - 136,914 GFX - 26,601 CPU - 14,104 SuperPI - 1M = 21s 3DMark - 9,381 (Says something funny - The result you just submitted was not run with default benchmark settings. All of the charts and information provided on these pages are based on benchmark results run with default settings, and thus the shown comparisons are not accurate. To obtain accurate comparisons, please re-run the benchmark with default settings." Cant work out how to change the settings on the free version. I must be missing something) Is this good for my system? I really dont know. |
|
|
|
|
07-19-2007, 10:41 AM
|
#173 |
|
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,875
|
I think you need the paid and registered version for that but I'm not sure.
The guys who can answer the question and give you all the recent comparison marks for your rig are here : http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/
__________________
Asus M4A77D, 64 X2 6000+, 4 GB Corsair DDR2 800 ram, Radeon 5770. |
|
|
|
|
07-28-2007, 05:49 PM
|
#174 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,033
|
New Build in the sig. Haven't OCed yet. Ill let you all know what the OC scores are after I break it in.
Super Pi 1m in 20s Aquamark 3 140,000 3dmark 06 10578
__________________
"But you don't have to take MY word for it" - Lavar Burton Current: Antec 900 ATX Case / ASUS P6X58D Premium / Corsair 620W PSU / Core i7 930 / 24GB Kingston HyperX T1 Black DDR3 1600 / 1.5TB Seagate SATA HDD / EVGA GTX 460 SE Laptop: 15" MBP 2.4ghz i7 MBP / 16GB DDR3 1333 RAM / 240GB Kingston HyperX SSD Network: Linksys E4200 running DD-WRT v24-sp2 |
|
|
|
|
08-06-2007, 02:25 PM
|
#175 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,033
|
Is there an edit function for this forum. I missed it.
 I just OC'ed to 3.2gHz and the system was stable. Had to loosen the ram timings a bit, but I broke 11k. I will have to load the profile again at home and get you and exact number. |
|
|
|
|
09-08-2007, 11:20 PM
|
#176 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South New Jersey
Posts: 505
|
I managed to OC my Q6600 to 3.114Ghz stable without playing with any voltage settings. I OC'd my X1950Pro 512MB to 621/749 and scored 6106 in 3DMark06.
3DMark06: 6106 CPU: 4848 (Q6600 @ 3,114 X1950Pro 512MB @ 621/749) 3DMark05: 11437 CPU: 12120 (Q6600 @ 3,114 X1950Pro 512MB @ 608/736) PCMark05: 8499 (Q6600 @ 3,114 X1950 Pro 512MB @ 621/749) Last edited by trowand; 09-09-2007 at 12:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
09-30-2007, 06:00 AM
|
#177 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 50
|
oced the opty to 2.84 got a 3dmark 06 score of 10220
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?c=8466581_2 Not bad for a dead socket. Still waiting on the W/C kit then looking forward to 3Ghz. Last edited by Rolandooo; 09-30-2007 at 06:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
10-01-2007, 02:07 PM
|
#178 |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,383
|
A whopping 3900 or so 3DMarks...and thats for '05. My system is on warranty, and I can't afford a new one quite yet, so I don't plan on overclocking the tar out of it. I do really well in Games though. FEAR runs just about maxed at over 30 frames, so I never know what all the fuss is about with benchmarks.
__________________
TFH, paraphrased: the bultin brner wouldnt evn boot it a usb burner woud but ten it gaeve an eror after i typed teh prduct key. i dont no waht it was it was a missng file, i fergt waht ti was but ti loked imporant can any1 help PLZ?! Check out PCP! (that's PCProfiles in case you thought I was on angel dust) http://www.pcprofiles.com/p/hitchface |
|
|
|
|
10-03-2007, 08:40 PM
|
#179 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 662
|
I don't know if I ask this already, but by 3Dmark0X test, do yu guys use the Demo or full version? I can only use Demo.
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2007, 11:03 PM
|
#180 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,033
|
demo
anyone know if XP bench marks higher than vista? |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
1Likes
Linear Mode
