|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
10-11-2005, 07:16 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 89
|
3dmark 05
Does anyone know the lowest score on 3dmark 05. I only get 260
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 07:25 PM
|
#2 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,959
|
Hah!...I will have to try that on my dinosaur computer at work. I bet that computer has a worse score than yours.
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity | |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 07:27 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 89
|
I know my comp. sucks. I have a fx5200 and a p4 3.0 with 1.5 gigabytes of ram
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 07:27 PM
|
#4 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
What are the specs for this system!? I almost wouldn't think something that low would support 3dmark05 (which requires DX 9.0 I think)
Wait, that doesn't seem right, especially with a p4 3.0. What score do you get for the CPU part?
__________________
"It is the way of man to make monsters and it is the nature of monsters to destroy their makers." |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 07:28 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 89
|
and what does the number of bits mean on the side of member
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 07:32 PM
|
#6 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
It's the number of bits that it would require to make your number of posts (in binary)
1 post - 1 bit 2 post - 2 bit 4 posts - 3 bit 8 posts - 4 bit 16 posts - 5 bit 32 posts - 6 bit 64 post - 7 bit 128 posts - 8 bit 256 posts - 9 bit 512 posts - 10 bit 1024 post - 11 bit and so on... |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 07:58 PM
|
#7 |
|
Tweak Monster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,961
 |
That score seems abit low but....I have never ran it....?
If you post a direct link or a downloadfile....I'll try it and post....
__________________
MSI 890GXM-G65 mATX/1075t/G-Skill DDR3-1600 2x4gb /WD 640 aaks 95mb/s /XFX 5830/Zalman9700nt/ Thermaltake TP750w modular ECS P55 Black Edition/i7-860/Geil Black Dragon 2x2gb 12800-ddr3/Asus 5970X2 vid card/2x640 AALS-Raid-0/Corsair TX-850w |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 07:59 PM
|
#8 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 08:01 PM
|
#9 |
|
~ Ryan ~
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
 |
I dont think it is possible to get 260, that is like at a constant 2 fps for each little film. Run it again with all unnecessary back groud apps not running.
__________________
RiotCats.com, an internet domain specifically fabricated and visually erected for the appreciation of the feline kingdom! |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 09:03 PM
|
#10 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 2,558
|
that sounds about right. I remember integrated scoring around 100-400 in some reviews. besides a FX5200 has crippled DX9 at best
__________________
My 1st Build: Antec SuperLANboy Case| Antec 480W Neopower| 16X Sony DVD-ROM | Nec 1.44 FDD | WD 74GB Raptor 10,000 RPM SATA HDD | Aspire Keyboard w/optical Mouse |Geil Value 1Gig| ASUS P4P800-E Delux Socket 478 | P4 3.2E 800FSB HT | eVGA GeForce 6800GT 256MB |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 09:09 PM
|
#11 |
|
Tweak Monster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,961
|
I just ran it..........2132pcmarks
Now thats on my "comunity" pc specs are: Biostar M7-Vit pro Athlon xp-2400 266fsb stock 1gig Corsair XMS utt-bh-5 2-2-2-5 Ata133 60gig h/d and BFG Asylum 5200 ultra stock 42proccess running.... The video card is really good this cards looks as good gaming as my 5700u in my sig....I had a regular 5200 and it stunk.... I would run it again and check your proccesses like said ...If you continue to get low scores then there is a problem....I have DX9.0c and the vid drivers are 66.xx series Last edited by MaxRat; 10-11-2005 at 09:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
10-11-2005, 09:34 PM
|
#12 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
There's a dedicated benchmark sticky thread below that you may want to post your benchmarks to (It's under Gaming and Benchmarking):
http://forum.pcmech.com/showthread.php?t=142344 |
|
|
|
|
10-12-2005, 09:44 AM
|
#13 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,771
|
3Dmark05 won't even run on a video card that doesn't have DX 9 hardware support. It laughs at my GF4 Ti4400 which only has hardware DX 8.1 support. A FX5200 may have crippled support, but it DOES have the required support. Just goes to prove how bad that card really is - it's not suitable for gaming, only general office and casual use. Your computer does not suck - just the video card. A 3.0 P4 and 1.5gb ram will run any game out there very well as long as you have a proper video card. I have a customer with a 2.53 P4 with 1gb ram who runs EQ2 very nicely - ya think his 6800GT might have something to do with that?
 Thread moved to the proper forum. Last edited by glc; 10-12-2005 at 09:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
10-12-2005, 03:38 PM
|
#14 |
|
Tweak Monster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,961
|
I am not really sure what the difference is between the 5200 and the 5200ultra I have installed in the pc I have listed but.... there is a big difference...plus it will overclock very nicely....
I had Everquest installed on the same pc with all 6 of the expansion packs at that time and it ran flawlessly with good settings.... I am sure if you had a different card that would help but...still don't explain the really low score.... I'll run it on my sig pc later and see what I get.... Oh yea...the visual test on pcmark05 are pretty awesome there seems to be alot of detail....I thought so anyhow... |
|
|
|
|
10-12-2005, 04:38 PM
|
#15 |
|
Techphile.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,959
|
I just checked the minimum requirements to run 3DMark05 and they require a 2 ghz COU ( I assume Intel) to run the benchmark. My work computer (the older one) is a 350mhz P2. Maybe if I overclock it some I can get it up to 2ghz?
...LOL
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2005, 05:40 PM
|
#16 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 143
|
I get 3100 with 6800 GT, 768 MB RDRAM, and Pentium 4 2.66 G
Does that sound about right? |
|
|
|
|
10-12-2005, 06:39 PM
|
#17 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
|
That sounds about right. I get 2461 on my old Dell 4600, which has a 2.66 gh CPU, 1 gig of ram Corsair VS, and a ATI Radeon 9800 Pro using Cat 5.9 drivers.
__________________
DFI Infinity 975X/G, Intel C2D E6600 (@3.4Ghz), 2 Gb DDR2 800 GSkill HZ, Powercolor X1900XT, 74 Gb Raptor SATA, 250 Gb Seagate SATA, Audigy 2 ZS, FSP Epsilon 600 watt PSU, NEC 3540 DVD-RW, ASUS DVD ROM, Thermalright SI-128, Thermalright HR-05, Lian Li PC65 case, Samsung 940B 19" LCD |
|
|
|
|
10-12-2005, 09:07 PM
|
#18 |
|
Tweak Monster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,961
|
rig in sig gets 3026pcmarks with un-tweaked vid-card (see sig in post #7)
I think I got plenty of headroom to tweak....gpu temp under load is 39c ambient(case) is 32c Last edited by MaxRat; 10-12-2005 at 09:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
