|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (5 bit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Dark
|
SO I SUPPOSE that your going to jump on it?? tell how good it is when you get it
__________________
1. Intel Core2Duo 3Ghz|Asus P5K Deluxe Wifi|4GB DDR2 800Mhz| Seagate 500GB*2| Evga 8800GTX 768MB| Antec SonataII case w/ 550W TruePower PSU|XP Pro 2. AMD Athlon 64 3500|Asus A8N-sli deluxe|2GB DDR ram|Maxtor 250GB HDD|ASUS NVIDIA 6800 256MB|antec sonataII case w/ 450W PSU|XP home |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 823
|
yes please give us some details....
__________________
R.I.P. #21 Sean Taylor 1983-2007 GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
Well...I'd like to download it but I'm having a heck of time trying to find a server that wants to cooperate.
__________________
"It is the way of man to make monsters and it is the nature of monsters to destroy their makers." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
I just ran it and got a 3445. My CPU is whats holding me back, If I had an FX or even a 3800+, the score would be significantly higher
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 43
|
i ran 3DMark05 and got a very low score - 4763 - at least i think it's low. is this normal for my system because i always see people scoring much higher with weaker systems than mine. my specs are below and i really want to know if it's normal. thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Left Coast
Posts: 87
|
You think your 3DMark05 score is low? I ran it for kicks and got 278 lmao
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 194
|
don't know what's wrong ... 3DMark 2006 refuse to start and freeze at the splash screen ... not responding.
all previous version of 3Dmark run just fine .. don't know whats the problem
__________________
Burn
Core Duo 2 E6700(2.66Ghz@3.7Ghz) , Mobo Asus PW5 DH , Cosair XMS2 4Gig (425Ghz) ,Single HD2900XT , OCZ 700watts Power supply, SATA 200, 320 and 160 Gig HD , X-Fi XtremeGamer fatality Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Wx geek
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 143
|
I got it to run fine, got a final score of 4444 (exactly) marks with 7800GTX (256) and AMD 4400+.
Mostly the new version just touches up on the old demos, adding HDR, SM3 and the like. There are now two separate CPU tests which factor in to your final score, testing with AI and physics. Supposedly having a dual core helps here. Deep Freeze is the only brand new demo, which is almost completely based around lighting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (5 bit)
|
3DMarks06 - 1604 marks
he's right, basically added HDR, SM3.0, new CPU tests anyone who can get 4444 is sick. :/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
|
This is what I was able to get on 3DMARK06: 5081
General Information Operating System Microsoft Windows XP DirectX Version 9.0c Mobo Manufacturer Mobo Model AGP Rates (Current/Available) 16x / N/A CPU Intel Pentium D 3001 MHz FSB 200 MHz Memory 1008 MB Display Information Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX Driver Name NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX Driver Version 8.1.9.8 Driver Status WHQL - FM Approved Co-operative adapters No Video Memory 256 MB Core Clock 526 MHz Memory Clock 1305 MHz Benchmark Settings Program Version 3DMark06 Revision 0 Build 2 Resolution 1280x768 Anti-Aliasing None Texture Filtering Optimal Vertex Shader Profile 3_0 Pixel Shader Profile 3_0 Force Full Precision No Disable Post-processing No Force Software Vertex Shaders No Force Software FP Filtering No Disable HW Shadow Mapping No Color Mipmaps No Repeat Count Off Fixed Framerate Off Main Test Results 3DMark Score 5081 3DMarks SM 2.0 Score 2192 Marks SM 3.0 Score 2194 Marks CPU Score 1436 Marks |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 85
|
I finally finished the download last night after 8 hours through dsl.
I can't remember the exsact score, something around 3500. Before I started the test, I had about 6 programs running in the background.. :\ I was also ripping a dvd to my HDD... So, I will try again tonight, hopefully with a more accurate score. I am hoping to at least get in the 4000's. The graphics tests turned out beautiful, expected from the GTX, but I was getting .25 fps on those CPU tests... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 143
|
Don't worry too much about the score... that 4000+ should run any game better than a 4400+. I think futuremark just put an emphasis on the cpu tests to promote dual core. And my fps during those tests weren't very high either, less than .5 fps.
Last edited by Leogecko; 01-20-2006 at 02:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10
|
WOW! That's crazy...mine only took about 2.3 hours also with DSL. What site did you download it from or which mirror? I don't know if the dual core made a difference or not but on the CPU test I also got only about .47 FPS. Anybody got any better on the CPU test or is there a way to make it run better?
Quote:
Last edited by str8spd2001; 01-20-2006 at 02:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 85
|
It is official, my score is 3874, and I believe on my first attempt it was closer to 3400.
I agree that those CPU tests aren't really fair, more like trying to get people to go out and buy a super fast dual core for $$$$$$. I downloaded from filefront, and the fact that I had to wait to download probably meant the server I connected to was near full. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Owosso, MI, USA
Posts: 1,283
|
Well, on several forums they have been saying that it seems to favor the NVIDIA cards. Based on the scores in this thread, that would seem to be true. It also helps to have the 7800 and X1800 cards, as the SM 2.0 and 3.0 tests perform better on these latest generation cards. With nothing overclocked, I got 2222 with my sig rig. Seems that vid card update may NOT wait until later this spring after all.
![]() Then again, this rig plays every game I've tried with all settings maxed without a hiccupp, so it's hard to justify.BTW, I went to File Shack, no wait, and downloaded it in 28 minutes with a cable modem with 3Mb down, 250Kb up speed.
__________________
DFI Infinity 975X/G, Intel C2D E6600 (@3.4Ghz), 2 Gb DDR2 800 GSkill HZ, Powercolor X1900XT, 74 Gb Raptor SATA, 250 Gb Seagate SATA, Audigy 2 ZS, FSP Epsilon 600 watt PSU, NEC 3540 DVD-RW, ASUS DVD ROM, Thermalright SI-128, Thermalright HR-05, Lian Li PC65 case, Samsung 940B 19" LCD |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
scored 2260 3dmark 06 Last edited by Burn; 01-20-2006 at 06:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member (12 bit)
|
I'm not even going to attempt this on my once-great PC. Hahah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
List of download sites (for those that are having problems):
http://www.futuremark.com/download/?3dmark06.shtml |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
I started to download 3Dmark06 but it was just taking forever so I cancled it for now. I may download it tonight and see what the hypes about.
__________________
< Antec 1200 | ASUS Rampage III Extreme | Intel Core i7-920 w/ Noctua cooler @ 3.1 GHz | Corsair Dominator's 6GB| (2) Sapphire HD 5770's in CrossfireX | WD Raptor 74GB | WD Caviar Black 1TB | Corsair HX850W > |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|