|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 13
|
12-18 fps in cs 1.6??
Ive got a 2.6ghz celron with 64 mb onboard vid card 256 ram 80 gb 5400 rpm hardrive And rarly see above 18 fps. At main screen it reads 60 soemtimes 70 fps. Seems it lagw with more sound and more text on screen. Also i play one 800x600 res open gl. You guys think its the comp or soemthign wrong with it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I like me
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tejas
Posts: 7,332
|
not 100% sure, but i would say that the problem comes from not having more ram, or even a dedicated video card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
256MB seems kinda low even for CS1.6 which basically runs on anything. its because windows XP( i assume you are on XP) takes up more than half of whatever ram you have. cs 1.6 is definately not the most demanding game but you might want to invest in a basic stand alone graphics card. dont get an expensive one if CS is all you will be playing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I like monkeys
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 2,512
|
Video card upgrade is going to be your best bet. Most onboard video draws its ram (in this case 64 mb) from the overall system memory. So, essentially you're running your entire computer on 192 mb of ram while trying to run a game. Windows XP is always running in the background no matter what you're doing, so the computer has to dedicate an additional portion of memory to it as well, reducing your total amount even more.
Upgrading to a card with its own dedicated onboard memory (any video card) will eliminate the overall ram theft and give you more performance to boot. How much improvement? Not sure, but I'll guarantee more than the 12-18 fps you're getting now. Is this a prebuilt computer (did you buy it from a retailer), or did you build it yourself? Sometimes low end boards exclude an AGP / PCI-E slot and force the onboard video as your only option. In that case a ram upgrade would be your only choice unless you went for a PCI (non - e) video card. This would give roughly the same performance as an AGP card if you can still find one somewhere. AGP cards are nearly dead, so PCI may be an extinct dinosaur. My original Riva TNT 2 card was PCI because one of my family's first computers had onboard video and lacked an AGP slot. It worked like a charm and ran the original Rainbow Six perfectly. I don't know if you could find a PCI card which would run CS, though I don't see much difference between it and Rainbow.
__________________
Desktop 1: Intel i7 920--GA-x58-UD3R--Corsair xMS3 6GB (3 X 2GB) DDR3 1333mhz--Sapphire HD 4870 1GB--PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750w psu--WD SATA 3.0 gb/s 320 GB HD--Lite-on DVD-DL burner--Thermaltake SopranoRS black case--Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Desktop 2: Intel C2D E4400--GA-P35-DS3R--Corsair xMS2 2GB (2 X 1 GB) DDR2 800--eVGA 8600 GT--Fortron Source 500 watt psu--WD 250 gb HD--HP DVD-DL burner--Windows Vista Home Premium Laptop: Apple Macbook Last edited by tomster2300; 08-15-2007 at 10:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (4 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 13
|
I bought it new form best buy its compaq persario s5100nx. Dot got agp slot but have pci slots but eh. Not really worth upgrading. I think ima get maybe a stick of 250 or 512 ram and a 250 gb 7200 rpm hardrive and then buy a new comp from newegg or best buy.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Corsair RAM woes...? | Darth Revan | Computer Hardware | 13 | 05-29-2007 03:05 PM |
| low fps rate playing tfc | JunkYardJeff | Gaming and Benchmarks | 7 | 08-09-2006 07:35 PM |
| 6800GT FPS Problem | Powersuppy | Home Theater, Audio, and Video | 4 | 03-23-2006 09:20 PM |
| New Radeon 9800 Pro 128 MB Gives Less FPS | doc6886 | Home Theater, Audio, and Video | 16 | 12-22-2003 09:04 PM |
| question about fps | wrelax | Gaming and Benchmarks | 5 | 07-26-2001 04:43 PM |