|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
04-03-2002, 07:07 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 355
|
Metal of Honor:AA
Here is the requirements
Requirements: Windows: XP/ME/2000/98/95 are supported. Windows NT is NOT supported. 450 MHz, Pentium II or 500 MHz AMD, 128 MB RAM, 8xCD/DVD ROM drive,DirectX 8.0. This is what is have on my computer corresponding to the requirments Windows 98 SE 450 MHz Pentium III 320MB SDRAM 40X CDROM Direct 8.0 It looks pretty good, but will it run smoothly with the processor speed? |
|
|
|
04-03-2002, 10:50 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Roanoke,VA
Posts: 1,311
   |
well, I have a friend that had very similar specs. It ran pretty well. I didnt see any problems...but if he had gotten a better video card it wold have run better...whats your video card?
|
|
|
|
|
04-03-2002, 10:57 PM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,761
|
Yeah, the video card is often overlooked, a lot of machines (retail type) with your specs had VooDoo2 or banshee cards which have trouble with some of the newer games.
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2002, 01:15 AM
|
#4 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 355
|
I have a 3dfx Voodoo3.
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2002, 03:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Roanoke,VA
Posts: 1,311
|
Thats what my friend had, from what i could tell, it ran fine on it...
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2002, 01:37 PM
|
#6 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 355
|
Thanks for the input
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2002, 09:05 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: California
Posts: 894
|
Think Quake3 on steriods. If your machine can just run Quake3, you will have a rough time with MOHAA. I have a 1.1GHz Thunderbird and a GF2 32MB, and it runs ok. Not at max detail, but it runs fine.
|
|
|
|
|
04-07-2002, 11:51 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 41
|
problem with the development
There have been thoughts on the AA message boards that when accessing graphic heavy areas of the game it will be slow on any machine. Some say that there are major flaws with the engine.
|
|
|
|
|
04-07-2002, 11:59 AM
|
#9 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Conrad, Montana USA
Posts: 903
|
Roger that. I have a 1.4 T-Bird, and it runs fine on it, except for the levels with snow falling. Then it's terribly jerky.
|
|
|
|
|
04-07-2002, 03:08 PM
|
#10 |
|
Member (3 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 7
|
mohaa
i was running game with celeron 667 geforce2 64meg on a via board and i was getting some lag in firefights offfline and on upgraded to p3 933 on intel board runs great graphics right up to highest
|
|
|
|
|
04-07-2002, 04:06 PM
|
#11 |
|
PC Tinkerer
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Long Beach, Mississippi
Posts: 2,090
|
Actually, the first scenes in the first level seem to be some of the most demanding in the game, so don't get discouraged if it looks awful at first.
I have a celeron 900 and an ATI 64 meg Radeon VIVO, and the game ran well, but still hit 10-15 FPS in places. It was by far more demanding than RTCW. |
|
|
|
|
04-07-2002, 04:08 PM
|
#12 |
|
PC Tinkerer
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Long Beach, Mississippi
Posts: 2,090
|
BTW, if you haven't bought the game yet, I'm gonna sell mine for $25. I played it for less than 2 weeks, and it is still like brand new, and was never registered.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
