|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
new geforce drivers 29.42
new drivers out for geforce: http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=windows2000
Last edited by wolfie; 06-11-2002 at 03:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (11 bit)
|
Thanks.
__________________
"The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected." -The Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd edition, June 1972 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
with these new drivers i got 10,256 at mad onion,no tweaking
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
Thats cuz you run it in 16 bit.
I got 98,768.2 at happy coconut so there. Default. ![]() No really, what did you bench before the new driver? Was there an improvement? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
it went up about 300 points, i run it 32 bit. but what was really strange was when i tweaked it my scores went down.
wolfie |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,771
|
hmmm......looks like Blak is cruisin' for a whack in the coconut with a happy stick........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
Heh heh, not by choice....
I love glc. But not in a gay way. What is the standard deviation of onion? Isnt it like 300 to 500 points? Someone somewhere said something like that. Soooo you would have to average them I guess. I do not know. What zackly did you tweak to make it lower the score? I know. You turned off the L1 and L2 cache right? Right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 66
|
The new 29.42 are real cool rivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
They run fine so far in my (I can not believe I am saying this) ACPI enabled box.
Ok so maybe it was sisoft that had hysterisis of 300 to 500 points. Last edited by Blakhart; 06-14-2002 at 11:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
Ok, I felt so bad I went and dug up my IBM 45 gig deathstar and loaded sans acpi. Got the latest mobo and vid card drivers from nvid and it lives. For how long is anyones guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
digitally confused
Premium Member
|
I would think these new drivers wouldn't really help a GeForce 256, would it?
__________________
. Pentium D 805 | ASUS P5L-MX | CORSAIR ValueSelect 2 GHz |Primary HDD WD 40GB Back up HDD Seagate 7200.10 250GB SATA | eVGA 7600gt | Creative X-Fi Extreme Music audio card | Hauppauge TV Tuner Card | Lite On DVD burner/ LightScribe | COOLER MASTER Case | Fortron ATX400-PA 400W Power Supply | ViewSonic Q19wb LCD |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
My gf2ti will not run reliably with anything but the driver that came with the card. If that! Hope yours is not as fickle....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
hi
i just put the new drivers in a gf2 400mx, i think it was that one, and they worked fine. they had the old drivers in from the old cd. seen some improvment when i put the new ones in. wolfie |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
digitally confused
Premium Member
|
Guess I could try them and just uninstall if I don't like them....
Hmmm.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,469
|
I just installed the new drivers and I haven't noticed any new features
Jim |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
From what I understand, nvid put back some of the image quality that they took out in the previous driver. They decrease image quality to get more speed.
I have noticed an improvement in image quality with this driver. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
anybody tried the beta 29.60 drivers yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
What 29.60? Where? Darn it I deleted the 29.42s and here you did not leave a link. Grrrrrrrrr
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
I saw the direction the comments where going over there(guru3d). I decided to install the driver that came in that box that had the missing bar code. You know the one? And ya know what?
23.11s roxor! I think some of the comments at guru were right on, as they progress away from the gf2/3, there is more and more load on the cpu due to the added features of the gf4. The image quality is poor on the early drivers but they seem to be a good bit speedier. And in the nforce mobo, the 23s are stable, as opposed to the MSI6380..... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|