|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,761
|
Microsoft stakes IP claims on OpenGL
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
Quote:
__________________
Darum still, füg' ich mich, wie Gott es will. Nun, so will ich wacker streiten, und sollt' ich den Tod erleiden, stirbt ein braver Reitersmann. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,761
|
How much money you have!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
But OpenGL is far superior to what Microsoft has done with DirectX(?), SGI actually knows what they are doing.
![]() Logan
__________________
Main: Gigabyte GA-770T USB3 - Phenom II 840 - 4GB DDR3 - Radeon 5750 1GB HTPC: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 - Athlon II 250 - 4GB DDR2 - Radeon 5670 512MB HTPC: Zotac GeForce 6100E-E - Athlon X2 5800+ - 4GB DDR2 "Play a Windows CD backwards and you'll hear satanic voices, thats nothing, play it forwards and it installs Windows." |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
Quote:
You're right!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Resident NORML Supporter
|
Actually, AMD or Intel... then money, then what you want to use it for. But that's only us intelligent people that think that way, everyone else bases their PC purchases SOLELY on money.
How useless, OpenGL is far superior to anything they have created, DirectX, and Intel's Direct3D falls far short as well. It just looks and performs better.
__________________
Asus P5B-E - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4 GHz - 2GB Corsair XMS2 - HIS X1650 XT Turbo - 400GB Seagate 7200.10 - Sound Blaster Audigy SE - Samsung 960BF LCD - Antec P180B - Corsair HX620W |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,761
|
When I spec out or build a computer, I look at what the person wants it for, business or gaming. ( If the person says that they want a machine just for some word processing and surfing I still build it to do moderate gaming, because eventually they will do it)
Next I find out what they want to spend. (Here I perfer business because they always have $1500 to build the machine, whereas the individual wants a $1500 machine for $300) Then based upon this I will chose Intel or AMD. After this I select the most important componant, the Motherboard and the chipset to use. (This is where I do most of my research). After this it is stroage space, video card, sound, RAM Amount, and other drives and cards. And lastly I get the fastest CPU I can get with the remaining money. A fast CPU with a cheap video card, slow hard drive, cheap video/sound card, cheap case and power supply, all based on a cheap motherboard will be a cheap slow computer when compared to a quality build with a slightly slow CPU. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
I have almost the same computer building philosophy, morris. The mobo is the most important part of a PC. To me the order is as follows: mobo, CPU (but after reading your post I think I'll change dat), PSU, vid card, monitor, case, HD and RAM.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|