Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Gaming and Benchmarks

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-18-2002, 11:45 AM   #1
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
A glimpse of the Radeon 9700

Just finished reading the article at Tomshardware and when the Radeon 9700 is released, it should be interesting. I found this paragraph a jaw dropper;

Quote:
Here are a few numbers for those of you who can't wait. The 3DMark2001SE score of GeForce4 Ti4600 was 11,400, while Radeon 9700, with its young driver, scored 14,000. Once 4x FSAA and 8x anisotropic filtering was used, the scores changed quite significantly. GeForce4 Ti4600 was able to get a mere 4500 points, while Radeon 9700 scored 10,000 points, thus, more than twice the points of the competitor from NVIDIA.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News

-Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me...
taking the glide path instead.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 11:54 AM   #2
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bridgeport, CT USA!
Posts: 404
Send a message via AIM to Texuspete00
this launch might cause the excitement the parhelia was supposed to. i'll have to wait and see. I'm starting to worry about how there only putting out a few now, hope the thing isn't $500
Texuspete00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 12:11 PM   #3
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
Well, it ain't gonna be cheap I'm sure. Just like anything else, the top of the line unit is gonna require deep pockets. I'm an AIW fan and would love to have the 8500 version, but until it comes down, I'm maxed at the 7500.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 02:45 PM   #4
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
Price for the 9700:$ 399.00 msrp
" 9000 pro: $149.00 ( with 128mb ram )
" 9000 : $109.00 ( with 64mb ram )
The 9000 pro is said to come with 64mb of ram as well but I haven't seen the price for that.
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 03:05 PM   #5
Don't tread on me
 
cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,121
Send a message via ICQ to cobra Send a message via AIM to cobra
I'll have to see some more reviews, anadtech (yuck) reviewed the parhelia, and it scored like "crapola", so I am not expecting much more from the 9700, and being developed in the same time frame, if those #'s you posted are the real deal, look out nvidia, someones about to spank your arse.
cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 03:15 PM   #6
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
I got the prices off of Tom's Hardware.
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 03:31 PM   #7
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
Keep in mind too Cobra, Matrox has always sucked at 3D, but in comparisons of 2D, they're tops. The benchmarks are right of Tom's Hardware and if the prices are reflecting any accuracy, you're right, nVidia has some SERIOUS competition with the 9700.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 03:36 PM   #8
Don't tread on me
 
cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,121
Send a message via ICQ to cobra Send a message via AIM to cobra
Just read anands review, seems to be right on par with Toms...
Nvidia, seems like you are on the ropes.....
Good job ATI
cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 06:52 PM   #9
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 610
Send a message via Yahoo to MSIuser
Well, I'm an AMD fan, and personally I'm gonna have my GF4 4400 for a long while, and if the 9700 comes out and is way better than the GF4 it is only to be expected. I would love to see it though, about time Nvidia had some REAL competition. The graphics industry moves so fast i feel nvidia may have rushed the GF4. they seem to be doing more for the gaming industry though, I am just after reading an article on a new gaming language that nvidia and microsoft has created, to make it easier for games developers to use the new pixel and vertex shaders. Sadly it will probably be a few years before we see the results.

Just my humble thoughts!
MSIuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 07:29 PM   #10
Member (10 bit)
 
tigstah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 823
i'm not convinced yet.....as far as i'm concerned the proof is in the pudding. i am constantly upgrading my pc's i want end user proof that this new card from ati is the real deal.....
tigstah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 09:39 PM   #11
Resident NORML Supporter
 
Furius92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,184
Send a message via AIM to Furius92
Keep in mind, those scores are using some of the earliest sets of drivers for it. You all know how the first release ATI drivers are...

It would be great if nVidia really took a good hit from this, and two to three weeks after release of the Radeon 9700 it will fall to around $350. And ATI has always implemented their FSAA and anistropic filtering with less of an impact on FPS than nVidia... over twice their score with all those things on. Now, how does the Radeon 9000 (Pro and non) compare to the Radeon 8500?
__________________
Asus P5B-E - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4 GHz - 2GB Corsair XMS2 - HIS X1650 XT Turbo - 400GB Seagate 7200.10 - Sound Blaster Audigy SE - Samsung 960BF LCD - Antec P180B - Corsair HX620W
Furius92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 09:48 PM   #12
digitally confused
Premium Member
 
TimPoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,301
Send a message via AIM to TimPoet
This babe is a smokin' video card. Too bad I'm not a top end user. But it will drive down the prices for the G4's and ATI's I bet....
__________________
.

Pentium D 805 | ASUS P5L-MX | CORSAIR ValueSelect 2 GHz |Primary HDD WD 40GB Back up HDD Seagate 7200.10 250GB SATA | eVGA 7600gt | Creative X-Fi Extreme Music audio card | Hauppauge TV Tuner Card | Lite On DVD burner/ LightScribe | COOLER MASTER Case | Fortron ATX400-PA 400W Power Supply | ViewSonic Q19wb LCD
TimPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 11:48 PM   #13
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bridgeport, CT USA!
Posts: 404
Send a message via AIM to Texuspete00
check the review on anand tech guys, much better than the tom's one. Tom only talks of how good, with the only numbers being 3d mark scores. Anand's got the cards compared with a GF4 being a 1 and scores for ati acorrdingly (1.5+ in some cases). tigstah- the prove may be here!
Texuspete00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2002, 11:49 PM   #14
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bridgeport, CT USA!
Posts: 404
Send a message via AIM to Texuspete00
sorry i can't smell- i mean spell
Texuspete00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 12:55 AM   #15
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
1.5 is a very commanding lead, and on early drivers too.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 01:28 AM   #16
Member (6 bit)
 
DJA_ILL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: America Jr.
Posts: 33


'nuff said.
DJA_ILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 09:27 AM   #17
snowboarder
 
Spyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
Send a message via AIM to Spyda
but while they keep on advancing and advancing, its getting stupid, they will get faster, more memory, and more expensive all the time, bettering each other every time, when 128MB or video memory is totally unneccesary at the moment, it will be good for years
Spyda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 09:55 AM   #18
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 610
Send a message via Yahoo to MSIuser
Don't forget though that they aren't really getting more expensive. Well OK they are, but that's same in all areas of technology and graphics industry is the one advancing the quickest. It would be nice to see a bit of competition, as long as I have the card that's winning!
MSIuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 10:36 AM   #19
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
More news: there's going to be a Radeon 9500 by the 4Q.
I won't be buying the $399.00 card for myself but if the price for the 9500 is about $250.00 it could be on my shopping list.
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 10:52 AM   #20
Resident NORML Supporter
 
Furius92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,184
Send a message via AIM to Furius92
I think the 9500 will have slightly lower core clock speed and RAM clock speed. Anyone see those like 250% gains over the Geforce 4 Ti 4600 at Anandtech? The Radeon 9700 got 2.5 or so and the GF4 Ti got 1, of course. I think it might have been on some of the anistropic filtering tests, which ATI always kicks nVidia's arse in.
Furius92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 09:11 PM   #21
digitally confused
Premium Member
 
TimPoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,301
Send a message via AIM to TimPoet
Quote:
Originally posted by Spyda
but while they keep on advancing and advancing, its getting stupid, they will get faster, more memory, and more expensive all the time, bettering each other every time, when 128MB or video memory is totally unneccesary at the moment, it will be good for years
I think it might seem stupid for the moment. But that may be because we are just on the bottom of the performance curve. I mean, all the cars built the first twenty years after the Model T came out, probably got nothing, comfortwise, on our lowest end cars today. Yet each one may have seemed a great improvement on the next.
The Parhelion and the new ATI are not just going for speed, but for quality of the pics. Especially in AA.
Gamers will all be playing without the hassle of jerky, jagged edged visuals because of this wild race we are seeing now. Sure in the small pic it looks crazy, but in the big one it makes sense to me.

Last edited by TimPoet; 07-19-2002 at 09:14 PM.
TimPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2002, 11:58 PM   #22
Resident NORML Supporter
 
Furius92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,184
Send a message via AIM to Furius92
Supposedly the Radeon 8500 will outperform both the Radeon 9000 and 9000 Pro. Something to do with the amount of texture processors or something per pipeline. Looks like I better grab my Radeon 8500 fast, since it is going to be phased out.
Furius92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2