|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
12-03-2002, 08:46 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
new "beta" nvidia drivers 41.09
|
|
|
|
12-06-2002, 11:55 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pickerington, OH-IO
Posts: 875
|
Thanks,
Why are you calling these Beta? This is the default driver on the Nvidia site. |
|
|
|
|
12-06-2002, 05:24 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
WHQL Candidate, so there not certified drivers yet.
 wolfie |
|
|
|
|
12-06-2002, 06:09 PM
|
#4 |
|
Aerospace
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 1,177
|
when they say 25% increase...
that means to what?
__________________
FastFly |
|
|
|
|
12-07-2002, 10:33 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pickerington, OH-IO
Posts: 875
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2002, 11:54 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
wolfie |
|
|
|
|
|
12-07-2002, 03:56 PM
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Pickerington, OH-IO
Posts: 875
|
3DMark2001 SE
40.71 7566 41.09 7596 (Default settings) |
|
|
|
|
12-08-2002, 03:02 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member (3 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6
 |
I have had nothing but problems with the beta drivers
Keep going back to the 30.82's, which perform great, with no "side effects" |
|
|
|
|
12-08-2002, 02:17 PM
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
Best of the 40xx series I have run. These do everything right in this system. A7N266C/1800/GF4TI4200/2X256.
Have the idea that 2xxx is best for gf2/tnt/mx class cards, 3xxx is best for any gf3, and the 4xxx for gf4ti's tho not the gf4mx's. Gf4mx's should get the 2xxx's, as they are really a gf2. Some thoughts. |
|
|
|
|
12-08-2002, 02:27 PM
|
#10 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Brooklyn Park,Minn.
Posts: 1,864
|
these drivers have given me my best scores at 3dmark
 wolfie |
|
|
|
|
12-08-2002, 08:18 PM
|
#11 |
|
Aerospace
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 1,177
|
up 3D marks another 80 points.
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2002, 11:22 AM
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
Example: 3082s@8400, 4109s@10274. Same sys.
|
|
|
|
|
12-11-2002, 10:13 AM
|
#13 |
|
digitally confused
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,301
|
they didn't help my 3DMark scores too much, what with my Celly 400 cpu, but they give me best performance in a firefight in CS, and that works for me!
Can't wait to get the P3 700 installed. |
|
|
|
|
12-14-2002, 08:56 PM
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
Rock on TP...
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
