|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 16
|
which is better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
Which one is better for what?
They are both completely different things.
__________________
Darum still, füg' ich mich, wie Gott es will. Nun, so will ich wacker streiten, und sollt' ich den Tod erleiden, stirbt ein braver Reitersmann. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 616
|
ATI OEM RADEON 9500 PRO 128MB DDR DVI is the better card....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 16
|
What I mean is whick card has better graphics for gaming. Which 1 is faster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
It's very strange. The first time I clicked on your links they displayed an OEM version of Win XP Home and some video capture card. Hence my question.
Now they are displaying a GF4 MX video card, which is crap; and a Radeon 9500 which is the VC you really want to buy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
I see a
1. ATI RADEON 9500 PRO 128MB DDR DVI BULK 2.GAINWARD/CARDEXPERT GeForce 4, 8X AGP. Ti 4200, 3.3ns, Power Pack Golden Sample, BGA 128MB DDR, I remember linking someone to some products and they came out wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Save $19 and go with the better card. All the articles and reviews that I've read show the ATI 9500pro to be the better card (which is why i bought it)
Personally I'm really happy with it, its a great card. Of course the ATI 8500 would of been and big upgrade from my GF2 pro...lol. The ATI is the better performer in most cases. Good price on it too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
If you can save a little more, the 9700 can't be beat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
go for the ATI
anyting with MX in it is a cheap budget version of the real thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookline MA USA
Posts: 551
|
9700 or 9700 pro?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
|
Pro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookline MA USA
Posts: 551
|
ok thanks, ill check price difference between the 9700 pro and the Asus Ti9200
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookline MA USA
Posts: 551
|
Im not sure I am able to pay twice as much for a video card at the moment, theres nothing wrong with an Asus ti4200 is there?
cant see an mx in there anywhere |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,771
|
A Ti4200 is an excellent gaming card for the money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
|
Consult your wallet.
If you can afford the best, go for it ($ 200 - $400) ! If not, get the most future proof card the budget can afford. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 16
|
My budget is under 200. both those cards cost the same on newegg.com. HOw much is the fx card going to be when it actually comes out. Are those two cards about the same performance , just another debate like the intel and amd issue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Aerospace
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 1,177
|
Its coming out at $399.99.
__________________
FastFly |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Sibak
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,080
|
VOte for the Gainward.
Good Luck,
__________________
By knowing what we value We will know what we want And how to act in life |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
OEM 9500pro is $172 at mwave.com
1 big vote for ATI 9500 pro! hehehe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
ATI 9500 pro is better than the 4200. It is close to the 4600 with reg settings, faster with AA and aniso and is hence more future proof. I think most suggesting the GF4 just prefer Nvidia for drivers or whatever. As far as faster card, def. 9500 pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Live for the moment
|
Did Nuclear say the GF4 was crap...wait a second I thought GeForce's were very good cards, and why do you say anything with MX in is it a cheap replacement...I was in here couple of weeks ago...and I was aking what card I should get and plenty of ppl said GF4, isnt it a good card?
__________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein I am ready to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter. - Sir Winston Churchill |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
|
avx487.....
Gforce cards come in two varities.
Those reading 4 Ti 200, 4Ti 400, and 4Ti 600 are all good cards. Those reading Gforce 4 MX, and other cards in that line, are aimed at the budget market and are, basically, retooled Gforce2 cards. That means they aren't up to speed for current games and aren't going to cut it for future ones. We're talking technology that is now 3 generations out of date. Why Nvidia did this I don't know. It's misleading to say the least. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|