Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Gaming and Benchmarks

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-18-2003, 06:45 PM   #1
Member (5 bit)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 16
which is better

http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproduc...ion=14-102-258
or
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...ion=14-128-142
N2OCooled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 06:48 PM   #2
Mondsreitersmann
 
Nuclear Krusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
Which one is better for what?

They are both completely different things.
__________________
Darum still, füg' ich mich, wie Gott es will. Nun, so will ich wacker streiten, und sollt' ich den Tod erleiden, stirbt ein braver Reitersmann.
Nuclear Krusader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 06:52 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 616
ATI OEM RADEON 9500 PRO 128MB DDR DVI is the better card....
edge345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 07:00 PM   #4
Member (5 bit)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 16
What I mean is whick card has better graphics for gaming. Which 1 is faster.
N2OCooled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 07:08 PM   #5
Mondsreitersmann
 
Nuclear Krusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
It's very strange. The first time I clicked on your links they displayed an OEM version of Win XP Home and some video capture card. Hence my question.

Now they are displaying a GF4 MX video card, which is crap; and a Radeon 9500 which is the VC you really want to buy.
Nuclear Krusader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 07:56 PM   #6
Member (10 bit)
 
LordofEchoSide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 614
Send a message via AIM to LordofEchoSide
I see a

1. ATI RADEON 9500 PRO 128MB DDR DVI BULK

2.GAINWARD/CARDEXPERT GeForce 4, 8X AGP. Ti 4200, 3.3ns, Power Pack Golden Sample, BGA 128MB DDR,

I remember linking someone to some products and they came out wrong
LordofEchoSide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 08:22 PM   #7
Member (10 bit)
 
Jeradln82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 763
Send a message via MSN to Jeradln82
Save $19 and go with the better card. All the articles and reviews that I've read show the ATI 9500pro to be the better card (which is why i bought it)

Personally I'm really happy with it, its a great card. Of course the ATI 8500 would of been and big upgrade from my GF2 pro...lol.

The ATI is the better performer in most cases. Good price on it too.
Jeradln82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 08:28 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
If you can save a little more, the 9700 can't be beat.
Blakhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 08:47 PM   #9
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 537
Send a message via ICQ to Bushtree Send a message via AIM to Bushtree
go for the ATI

anyting with MX in it is a cheap budget version of the real thing.
Bushtree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 10:55 PM   #10
Member (10 bit)
 
ILLPHIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookline MA USA
Posts: 551
9700 or 9700 pro?
ILLPHIL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 10:58 PM   #11
Mondsreitersmann
 
Nuclear Krusader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,781
Pro.
Nuclear Krusader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 11:02 PM   #12
Member (10 bit)
 
ILLPHIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookline MA USA
Posts: 551
ok thanks, ill check price difference between the 9700 pro and the Asus Ti9200
ILLPHIL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2003, 11:06 PM   #13
Member (10 bit)
 
ILLPHIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookline MA USA
Posts: 551
Im not sure I am able to pay twice as much for a video card at the moment, theres nothing wrong with an Asus ti4200 is there?
cant see an mx in there anywhere
ILLPHIL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2003, 02:40 PM   #14
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,771
A Ti4200 is an excellent gaming card for the money.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2003, 04:55 PM   #15
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
Consult your wallet.
If you can afford the best, go for it ($ 200 - $400) !
If not, get the most future proof card the budget can afford.
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2003, 09:36 AM   #16
Member (5 bit)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 16
My budget is under 200. both those cards cost the same on newegg.com. HOw much is the fx card going to be when it actually comes out. Are those two cards about the same performance , just another debate like the intel and amd issue?
N2OCooled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2003, 09:42 AM   #17
Aerospace
 
Fastfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 1,177
Its coming out at $399.99.
__________________
FastFly
Fastfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2003, 06:41 PM   #18
Sibak
 
Lord Prism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Houston, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,080
VOte for the Gainward.

Good Luck,
__________________
By knowing what we value
We will know what we want
And how to act in life
Lord Prism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2003, 07:37 PM   #19
Member (10 bit)
 
Jeradln82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 763
Send a message via MSN to Jeradln82
OEM 9500pro is $172 at mwave.com

1 big vote for ATI 9500 pro! hehehe
Jeradln82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2003, 10:32 AM   #20
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bridgeport, CT USA!
Posts: 404
Send a message via AIM to Texuspete00
ATI 9500 pro is better than the 4200. It is close to the 4600 with reg settings, faster with AA and aniso and is hence more future proof. I think most suggesting the GF4 just prefer Nvidia for drivers or whatever. As far as faster card, def. 9500 pro
Texuspete00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2003, 12:11 PM   #21
avx
Live for the moment
 
avx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,938
Send a message via AIM to avx Send a message via Yahoo to avx
Did Nuclear say the GF4 was crap...wait a second I thought GeForce's were very good cards, and why do you say anything with MX in is it a cheap replacement...I was in here couple of weeks ago...and I was aking what card I should get and plenty of ppl said GF4, isnt it a good card?
__________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein
I am ready to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter. - Sir Winston Churchill
avx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2003, 12:46 PM   #22
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
avx487.....

Gforce cards come in two varities.
Those reading 4 Ti 200, 4Ti 400, and 4Ti 600 are all good cards.
Those reading Gforce 4 MX, and other cards in that line, are aimed at the budget market and are, basically, retooled Gforce2 cards. That means they aren't up to speed for current games and aren't going to cut it for future ones. We're talking technology that is now 3 generations out of date.
Why Nvidia did this I don't know. It's misleading to say the least.
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2