|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
02-21-2003, 05:51 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 537
  |
higest 3DMARK03 score??
what the higest score you have seen.. i have yet to see anyone that has broken 5000 points. the highest i have seen is around 4800 i think..
|
|
|
|
02-21-2003, 06:06 PM
|
#2 |
|
The Procrastinator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,653
|
wouldnt know i dont have 3dmark03...
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2003, 06:50 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 628
|
<---- Can not even run a single benchmark test on 2003.
Last edited by Trent Steel; 02-21-2003 at 07:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
02-21-2003, 08:54 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 537
|
dont feel bad. i only score in the 1000's with 512 pc2700 and a 2.53ghz P4 with G4 Ti4200
|
|
|
|
|
02-21-2003, 11:23 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,487
|
The highest one submitted to futuremark.com is a 6865.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=249732
__________________
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail." |
|
|
|
|
02-22-2003, 12:34 AM
|
#6 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 537
|
i think 1 thing that kills me is now there is a sound testing.. and my sound sucks.. (sound blaster live.)
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2003, 01:45 AM
|
#7 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 412
|
What's the test running?I don't know any test it runs but just get a brief from the screenshot from their site.
So how many test it holds?? |
|
|
|
|
02-22-2003, 10:41 AM
|
#8 |
|
The Procrastinator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,653
|
weird,
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=249732 this guy doesnt seem to have a top notch pc either 
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2003, 11:49 AM
|
#9 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 485
|
ok umm why doesn't it show cpu tests or fill tests and rag troll etc? Those are standard tests for the number... how could they even get a number if they didn't run those tests? and it says they have a 4.245 ghz p4.. If thats anyone, I'm guessing its the people who did the iceman cometh thing...
|
|
|
|
|
02-22-2003, 01:06 PM
|
#10 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 780
|
nVidia is complaining about it too. I think they are po'd about their scores with their new card. They say it doesn't use codes that are used in the real world of gaming.
"Futuremark, the developer of the software in question, has responded to NVIDIA's harsh attack on its benchmark. In a PDF document published on its website, Futuremark addresses NVIDIA's accusations and explains its own view of the situation in a kind of rebuttal. Lastly, ATi has also issued an official statement on the topic, clarifying its own position on 3DMark 2003. " You can find the aticle at tomshardware.com just search "3dMark 03". |
|
|
|
|
02-22-2003, 01:37 PM
|
#11 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 221
|
yeah, the article said that 3dmark 2003 is kind of like a preview to how well your system will run a direct x 9 game and that 3mark2002 is for dx8. since some cards dont' have dx9 support, they all get low scores.
Last edited by macrymble; 02-22-2003 at 01:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
04-02-2003, 07:11 PM
|
#12 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 780
|
Well I just installed and ran the test. See my attached score.
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2003, 07:43 PM
|
#13 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,487
|
Suitcase, not the thread for posting your score. Post it here:
http://forum.pcmech.com/showthread.p...threadid=55925 btw, that score seems very low for your system. Not sure what's going on. |
|
|
|
|
04-03-2003, 04:01 AM
|
#14 |
|
snowboarder
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
|
i htink i got about 3000 with my PC, so whats up with yours
__________________
Antec Sonata - Abit IS7-E - P4 2.4/800 @ 3.0 - 1GB OCZ Gold DDR500 - FX5950 Ultra 256MB - Audigy 2 - WD JB 80GB - XP Pro |
|
|
|
|
04-03-2003, 02:09 PM
|
#15 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 921
|
I got 100 with my duron 900 and Ati radeon 7500.
|
|
|
|
|
04-03-2003, 02:09 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,487
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-03-2003, 06:11 PM
|
#17 | |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 763
 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2003, 04:37 AM
|
#18 |
|
snowboarder
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
|
oh yea, i ran it again, i only ran it the day it came out, all those weks ago, i forgot,
anyway, pitiful 1500 may be a lower score, but my PC still kicks arse on every game, i can just max the settings and be on my way I wouldnt get a 9700 just to make the score go up, i dont need to, and by the time I really do need a newer graphics card, the 9700 will be just as out of date as my Ti4200 Last edited by Spyda; 04-04-2003 at 04:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
04-04-2003, 06:56 AM
|
#19 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hasselt-Limburg-belgium
Posts: 289
|
my score...
this was my score....
AMD athlon 1100 , abit kt7a , 448mb sdram , ati radeon 9500 pro 40 gb maxtor hd 7200 4mb , audigy 1 this all is running on w98 +dx9.0.....and my drivers are fault! they are drivers for w2000/me/xp my score : 2984 .....other with same system get much more...some even the double!! i dunno what it is..but these scores aren't right
__________________
Antec P182 , Corsair 520W modular , Asus P5K-E , Intel Q6600 Core2Quad , Corsair Twin2X 2GB DDR2 PC6400 CL5 , XFX GeForce 8800GTS Alpha Dog Edition , Maxtor 250GB SATA II 300 7200rpm 16mb , Samsung 2253bw |
|
|
|
|
04-04-2003, 07:54 AM
|
#20 |
|
snowboarder
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
|
i think 3dmark03 is an utter POS really, seems to be totally irregular between systems of the exact same spec
|
|
|
|
|
04-04-2003, 02:02 PM
|
#21 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 780
|
sorry about the wrong thread renegade.
Concerning the score, it said it couldn't run one of the tests. Not sure which one, I'm visiting in VA bch and not at my pc. |
|
|
|
|
04-08-2003, 01:31 PM
|
#22 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bridgeport, CT USA!
Posts: 404
|
All dx8 cards do badly. The scores will go up in time. Is it not this bad running 2001se on a dx7 card? I dont remember but not a very good indicator of how your computer plays games in general.. that seems to be what ppl want. More how it may perform in dx9... not half bad for that, then again.... no game engines. An OC'd GF4 ti4600 would get better frame rates than a stock 9500pro, but in 3dmark 2003, no dx9 make the gf4 score very badly because of emulation and such.
|
|
|
|
|
04-08-2003, 02:18 PM
|
#23 |
|
snowboarder
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
|
but 3DMark doesnt use the same things as games ever will, so its just nice to look at, nothing more
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2003, 12:49 PM
|
#24 | |
|
Member (1 million bit!)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,160
|
Yeah...5352...that's right...
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
