|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
11-11-2000, 12:30 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (2 bit)
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Woodside, NY, USA
Posts: 3
|
Which do you think is better in terms of frame rates and image quality--OpenGL or Direct3D? I played Homeworld: Cataclysm using both, but I didn't notice a difference. Is one better than the other or am I just not using the right settings?
|
|
|
|
11-11-2000, 03:36 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 2,119
  |
In games that support it, OpenGL is generally better in terms of eye candy and frames per sec, but Direct 3d is quickly catching up. On the other hand I'm sure there are exceptions to the rule.
__________________
To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a computer. patrbarnes@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
