Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Gaming and Benchmarks

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-19-2003, 09:45 AM   #1
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 282
Frames per second

On average, what's your fps in game?

Mines is 30-60 fps with tnt32 pro. It's pretty decent. How about you guys?
Xion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2003, 09:53 AM   #2
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 412
Send a message via ICQ to FantasySoul
Well,it depends on wat game and graphics was set.
I got an average frame rate of 45-30 fps in Splinter Cell.....
Kinda Dizzyyy~~~~
FantasySoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2003, 07:09 PM   #3
snowboarder
 
Spyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
Send a message via AIM to Spyda
i dont know, but its pretty fast, i think its about 80+ in UT2003
Spyda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2003, 07:13 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
If the sys wont do 100 in game, I don't play it.
Blakhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2003, 07:45 PM   #5
Member (10 bit)
 
DilLy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 772
100 is more than what is needed though. I mean, at the resolutions I play at, my monitor doesnt even refresh 100 times persecond, and I don't like screen tearing so...

Yu must not play the latest games. If you do, you have the toppest of the top of the line PC, or you don't play with full details, cause a constant 100 fps is asking too much these days, with the latest games.

Now if you are not getting 100 fps in say, oh CounterStrike, then I would suggest updating your PC.

But anyway.
One example of my fps. I play at 1280x1024x32 in UT2003 at the highest possible detail settings with an average of 5 bots. v-sync enabled.

SInce v-sync isenabled I can't go over 90 fps, but i don't get that nasty screen tearing either so I don't mind. In an intense firefight the fps can go down to 35-40. Of course this depends on the map and how many bots or plyaers are in the map.

I hope to get a new machine in a few months, with the latest card and processor.
DilLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2003, 08:28 AM   #6
Member (11 bit)
 
sleepypost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
on average i'd say 90 fps (everything turned on). since i've been playing my Super mario 64 rom i'll have to say 60 fps (software limitation!).
sleepypost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2003, 09:25 AM   #7
snowboarder
 
Spyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
Send a message via AIM to Spyda
well, in that passmark performance test i get about 880 fps average at default run, some being about 690, some being 1200

Last edited by Spyda; 05-20-2003 at 09:27 AM.
Spyda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2003, 10:48 AM   #8
Member (11 bit)
 
sleepypost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
in Passmark, 950 fps and also about 1200 fps. games, 90 fps
sleepypost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2003, 03:46 PM   #9
snowboarder
 
Spyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
Send a message via AIM to Spyda
aaaghh, i took frame limiter off in vice city, it was going so fast, it was horrible
Spyda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2003, 07:31 PM   #10
Member (11 bit)
 
sleepypost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
now you see how it would be if you played an old (and i mean OLD) game that didn't have a frame limiter... crazy!
sleepypost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2003, 10:55 AM   #11
snowboarder
 
Spyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
Send a message via AIM to Spyda
playing GT2 on ePSXe with max fps is mental, 250+ fps and the demio seems like a TVR
Spyda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2003, 01:00 PM   #12
Red Sox Nation
 
Alienware_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,546
Send a message via AIM to Alienware_Dude
I *always* v-synch my games, so it's 70FPS at 1280x1024, or 60FPS at 1600x1200. Everything is always on and/or the highest it will go, and I usually use 2x-4x AA.
Alienware_Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2003, 09:49 PM   #13
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
I keep v- sync on so no game is going over 85 FPS.
My 17" monitor is at optimum at 1024x768, I use 4x AA for everything just now with AF set at 2x ( I'm beginning to wonder if I shouldn't just return AF to "Application Preference" )
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2003, 11:23 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
At 1024 I doubt you can tell the diff, unless your dot pitch is rather large, say like .28 or so. Then you may see it but it will still be pretty hard to see.
Blakhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2003, 11:51 PM   #15
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
Before I acquired the XP refresh rate problem I would have agreed with you.
But over the last few months I've become acutely aware of changes in refresh rate and, to my surprise, changes is FPS.
I think I was basically annoyed into paying attention.
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2003, 01:16 AM   #16
Member (10 bit)
 
LordofEchoSide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 614
Send a message via AIM to LordofEchoSide
at 1024x768 I can definetly tell from 60 fps and 85 fps (my monitors max)

btw, I turn AF all the way to 16x and I see NO performence hit. shouldn't I?
LordofEchoSide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2003, 02:31 AM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
Maybe not with a 9500, and maybe not with that specific game. Thought yours was a 9700 in disguise?
Blakhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2003, 08:52 AM   #18
snowboarder
 
Spyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,462
Send a message via AIM to Spyda
i know what AA does, but never saw a difference with AF, whats it supposed to do?
Spyda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2003, 10:46 AM   #19
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
I'm taking this from pg.30 of the June 2003 MaximiumPC:

For textures that need aniso filtering-such as those that stretch deep into a scene-the feature makes everything look significantly sharper. However, the majority of textures just don't need aniso, so enabling it (or setting the slider to far to the right) is a waste of memory bandwith. Performance mode forces bilinear filtering on the textures, instead of using the superior Quality trilinear filtering method. We recommend clicking Application Preference, so that your game applies anisotropic filtering only to the textures that need it.

Excuse me while I go turn this off in ATI's Control Panel.
There probably will be some games that need it, and now I know why those huge scenes are used when showing it off, but I don't need it just yet.
I'll rethink this if I end up buying Halo.
pam123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2003, 10:53 PM   #20
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 282
If I were to upgrade to a ti4200 128 mb ddr, would my fps in Counter-Strike be over 100?

How bout a ati 9700 pro? Would it be about 200? Not sure.
Xion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2003, 11:00 PM   #21
Member (10 bit)
 
LordofEchoSide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 614
Send a message via AIM to LordofEchoSide
nope, the half-life engine is limited to 100 fps
LordofEchoSide is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2