|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
|
Problems with 3DMark03
Right after i finished making my system i tried this out. I got a horrible score and i went down to 3fps @ certain points.
2.66ghz 533fsb P4 9700Pro 1gb 2700 ddr @ 333mhz (?) Cant remember the name of the MSI mobo, but it has AGP 8x enabled. What else could matter? What the heck is wrong with my machine? T.I.A brassman |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,652
|
What was your score?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
same problem w/ a score of only 2540 i have seen scores up to around 4800
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
HOT ROD
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
|
Are you running the latest Catalyst drivers?
The 9700 should score 4500 or better not sure on the 9600 but I would guess 3500 or better.
__________________
Fast enough 2 get by.....old enough 2 know what not 2 try -You know it was me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
i heard those drivers are sometimes bad
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
HOT ROD
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
|
I've had no problems with the Catalyst 3.6's or 3.7's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
and where would i get those from and i take it those are better than the ati drivers
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
HOT ROD
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
|
The Catalyst are ATI drivers with the 3.7's being the latest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
snowboarder
|
my 9600Pro can score more than 4000 in 3DMark03, so a 9700 should do more than that
__________________
Antec Sonata - Abit IS7-E - P4 2.4/800 @ 3.0 - 1GB OCZ Gold DDR500 - FX5950 Ultra 256MB - Audigy 2 - WD JB 80GB - XP Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
3dmark03 can go down to 3 fps on the CPU tests, my system does this on the troll's lair demo. If you are talking about GPU tests going down that low then maybe there could be a problem, although I'm using a 9800 and don't really have anything to compare it to. Just for comparison's sake, my highest score is 5714. If you could post your score it might help.
__________________
Desktop | Antec Performance Plus 1080AMG | Antec 430W PSU | Intel D875PBZ | Intel P4 3.0C | | 4x512 MB dual-channel DDR400 Kingston HyperX | ATI Radeon 9800 pro 256 MB | Creative Sound Blaster Audigy Gamer | | LiteOn DVD-ROM | LiteOn CDRW | 36 GB WD Raptor | 250 GB WD SATA2 | Sony Floppy | XP pro | |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
d/l-ed the catalyst drivers and not much help. at some points during the first gpu test i can get 200+ fps at some points. but after that demo its just under 50 sometimes even 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
bump
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
snowboarder
|
it goes lower for everybody
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
well i know that is a real low score would the vid on a 4x agp slot make that much of a diff cuz it is twice the timage(lol), so wouldnt it be twice the mark?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
ok well i dont have a clue why its so low, does ANYBODY know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
ok scored again and got 2633. the frames were down in the 2nd 3rd and 4th game test. and were down to 1 fps at trolls lair under cpu test
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Anime:Any-may
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kota Bharu, Malaysia
Posts: 2,447
|
TO make it faster-close all programs running in the background-Depends on your card-I think a marginal increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
HOT ROD
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
but would it make that much more of a diff? we're talkin 2000+ added score
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member (8 bit)
|
alright now its buggin out while playing call of duty so now i am thinkin about gettin a 9700pro, someone on another forum had it and got scores of 6000+, is this a good idea and now i will get the 128mb
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|