|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 230
|
HL2 requirements
What's with everyone in the mindset that they'll need the most sickly insane computer ever created to run Half Life 2? I've even seen numerous posts on other boards stating that if someone wants to play HL2 they'll need to purchase a 9800XT. From what I collect, low-end systems will play it fine, and it'll take a little more juice to run it with AA/AF enabled and details turned up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
iTroll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 818
Posts: 2,252
|
Well if you want to run HL2 at good resolutions with full detail and AA/AF enabled youll need a crazy video card. To just run the game all you need is like a 16mb Riva TNT2 Pro. The requirements arent high, its jus the detail that requires high end cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
I've heard that having a DX9 card actually adds detail not available in lower DX cards. If I find the article I'll post it about exactly what it adds for HL2.
__________________
*The command line, an elegant weapon for a more civilized age* |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
Well for each step up in Dx you get more details in effects, I am guessing that with Dx9 cards all the new features are the standard stuff for Dx9. I should be fine with the 9800 Pro
When I bought the card I had expected me to have been playing HL2 many times by now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 230
|
I'll probably be too busy playing BF Vietnam at 100+ fps to mess with HL2 at 15 with everything turned down anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
Yeah, I can't wait to try Half-Life 2 on my parents Pentium II
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England the centre of the world
Posts: 676
|
Anyone thinking of getting Doom 3?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Yeah, I'll get both....they both look excellent. Now if they'd just hurry up and get released....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Hopefully D3 has a good singleplayer experience... well, hopefully HL2 has a good one too... well, hopefully they both get released sometime this year!
EDIT* coolcps, i don't mean just adding shader effects and other DX9 specific things. HL2 will know you have a higher end card, upping the detail by actually adding more detail... more vines in a pond, more decals on a building... besides all the nifty effects that come with DX9. Last edited by DragonNOA1; 01-06-2004 at 10:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: England the centre of the world
Posts: 676
|
I hope they come with good multiplayer aswell but ill proberly play BF vietnam online and those 2 singleplayer
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Lest we forget
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,870
|
My 9600se should be ok, shouldnt it? Their gonna give me HL2 free for buying it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
Its not just based on the grfx card I think, it does a whole system diagnostic then it puts out the best graphics and performance the system can. Doesnt matter HL2 was so 6 months ago!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 230
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
Doom 3 looks good, but the requirments are probably ridiculously huge. I'll probably just get HL2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
In an article about HL2 it is supposed to work the best on a 3ghz ATI 9800 Pro. Anything above and beyond won't do any good except get higher frame rates. So the specs aren't all that high that no one can attain them. D3 should prolly be about the same specs. I'm sure all 2+ ghz machines will run the game just fine with a good vid card like a 9600 Pro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
EESh... Radeon 9000 Pro can't even run UT 2003 at highest detail properly... Theres not much hope for me.
DragonNOA1- prepare to celebrate your 1024 post!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Thanks Largosama!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
Actually I can run UT2003 on my 9000 at full graphics
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
|
will HL2 run ok on my computer?
2.66 ghz HT p4 1gb RAM geforce fx 5600 and yeah.. gfx card not too great but i got it for free so shut up |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
snowboarder
|
my old GF 4 Ti4200 64MB ran UT2k3 at full detail on 1024x768 res at crazy fps, you want to check you arent doing something wrong largosama
__________________
Antec Sonata - Abit IS7-E - P4 2.4/800 @ 3.0 - 1GB OCZ Gold DDR500 - FX5950 Ultra 256MB - Audigy 2 - WD JB 80GB - XP Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,789
|
The way I look at it, if ATI is willing to bundle the game with their midgrange cards (the 9600XT for instance) then it must run fine on them. If not, what would be the point of bundling the game?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member (11 bit)
|
doom # will be bad ace. Trent Reznor did the sound track so that will add to the make you poop in your pants factor. Doom 3 is supposed to Come out with HL2 they are going to compete gee whos gonna win that one umm let me think oh yah HL2
__________________
"But you don't have to take MY word for it" - Lavar Burton Current: Antec 900 ATX Case / ASUS P6X58D Premium / Corsair 620W PSU / Core i7 930 / 24GB Kingston HyperX T1 Black DDR3 1600 / 1.5TB Seagate SATA HDD / EVGA GTX 460 SE Laptop: 13" Mackbook Pro Network: Linksys WRT54GL running DD-WRT v24 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member (6 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 53
|
someone answer.
i have a 2.66 ghz p4 1 gb ram geforce fx 5600 non-ultra 48x cd rom (im not sure that matters) and 120 gb 7200 rpm hard drive (not sure if that matters either) so yeah, tell me if doom 3 and/or half life 2 will be able to run well with partial/ok graphical settings thanks, Bryan |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
Yes you will have decent graphics with that setup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
snowboarder
|
might have decent graphics ith high detail but downright crappy frame rates, like 9
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,639
|
Judging from what Newell said in Sept. the game will treat the 5600 as if it were a DX8.1 card.
Thus further embarassing NVidia, 2003 wasn't their year. You'll miss some eyecandy but you'll get playable frame rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hell (A.K.A Naperville, IL)
Posts: 236
|
see, it makes a dif depending on wether you are addicted to the game or wether its just an "ok" game to you. if you only play it a little then i'm sure you'd be willing to make concessions on behalf of the graphics.
i dont much like half life (except cs. the god of multiplayer gaming). so i couldn't care less about how well hl2 will play on my setup amd 2400+ 256meg ram geforce fx5200 128 mb (coming soon) according to whats been said, i'll get crappy framerates in hl2. no biggie. maybe for doom i'd change but hl never seemed great to me besides, i still aint beat hl yet |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
snowboarder
|
if you dont have the fx5200 yet, i wouldnt bother getting it, save a little more for a better card, i know you said you dont care for framerates etc, but that card is dead before its taken off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hell (A.K.A Naperville, IL)
Posts: 236
|
its on stage 2 in newegg order. i plan to try them early tomorrow to see what i can do (cancel, substitute, etc.). if i can i'll sub for a 9600se
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Na Pali Haven
Posts: 2,812
|
just get a regular 9600, i've heard bad things about "se".
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|