Go Back   PCMech Forums > General & Off Topic > General Discussion

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-01-2004, 07:55 AM   #1
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
Browser security

I was just thinking how people everywhere are telling each other to go with Firefox or other alternative browsers because of the many vulnerabilities of IE. But then it got me thinking, how long is it until the people who expose IE's problems notice people are using these other browsers? Won't that mean these people will find security holes in these alternative browsers instead?
ric449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004, 08:12 AM   #2
Got Privilege?
 
fudtone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: IA go Hawks
Posts: 1,257
I don't think that would be anytime soon. I believe the hackers are actual after Microsoft not the users.
__________________
P4 2.8E | 1.5GB ddr400 VR dual channel | Sony CD-R/RW | Windows XP | ATI X1950pro | Viewsonic P95F | Intel D865PERLX | WD 36g Raptor | MCHSI 3mb Cable
"Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." Pablo Picasso (1881 - 1973)
"Absence of proof is not proof of absence." William Cowper (1731 - 1800)
Wisdom Speaks: Have in your mind that which would constitute a miracle for
you. Get the vision. Suspend disbelief and skepticism. Allow yourself to
take the journey toward real magic.
fudtone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004, 08:27 AM   #3
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
 
mbossman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,439
Re: Browser security

Quote:
Originally posted by ric449
Won't that mean these people will find security holes in these alternative browsers instead?

every product has security holes in some manner shape or form.

Lets look at it from a hacker's point of view:
where can i obtain the deepest penetration across the widest number of targets?
A) poke, prod & disassemble a product that is used by less than 2% of the computing population

B) poke, prod & disassemble a product that is used by 80% of the computing population.

People are people, they want to most bang for their buck (so to speak) and don't want to expend any more additional energy than is necessary.

Plus, in many ways, MS does a lot of their work for them: MS ID's a security hole, issues a patch, hackers reverse engineer the patch to create an attack and rely on the intrinsic laziness of people not to patch their systems as recommended by the manufacturer.

Patching is, unfortunately, basic maintenance for a PC, akin to chaning the oil, rotating the tires and getting tune ups for your car.
__________________
Veritas Principium Libertas

Traveling Moose
mbossman2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004, 07:35 PM   #4
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: University of California, Santa Barbara
Posts: 800
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

Mozilla's popularity for June is 11.4%, which is still significantly smaller than IE5/IE6's collective 81.4%, but still a good portion. In the next few years, depending on the success of the next IE, mozilla could well become a viable target.

But with IE, it's already connected to other parts of windows, whereas Mozilla is an application that stands much more on its own, which makes it more secure. Also, any security flaw found is likely to have a fix sooner, and in my personal opinion, people who use Mozilla are not as much the "set it and forget it" type, they would get the updated version sooner.
mattg2k4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004, 07:39 PM   #5
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 2,374
But what I'm saying is that with other browsers being recommended so much, it could soon become a much more viable candidate for attck, like mattg said. But I disagree where you say the security flaw will have a fix sooner, I seriously doubt the creators of these alternate browsers have the manpower of Microsoft's patch developers.
ric449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2004, 08:29 PM   #6
aym
Registered User
 
aym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,965
Quote:
Originally posted by ric449
But what I'm saying is that with other browsers being recommended so much, it could soon become a much more viable candidate for attck, like mattg said. But I disagree where you say the security flaw will have a fix sooner, I seriously doubt the creators of these alternate browsers have the manpower of Microsoft's patch developers.
Check out these two articles.

Two vulnerabilities in IE have been around for 11 months now without any patches from MS, they allow attackers to to install malware when a web page is opened, nothing more.

OTOH, Firefox, being Open Source, has plenty of developers reviewing the code, so security holes get fixed in no time, even before that attackers discover them.

And IE is integrated into the OS, so vulnerabilities in IE allow attackers to do much more damage to the whole OS.

IE runs unsafe VB scripts and ActiveX controls, the source of like 99% of malware.

Firefox doesn't support any scripting language other than the sandboxed JavaScript, and its extensions aren't automatically installed, they are easy to uninstall, and the developers are working on a feature that makes Firefox refuse to install extensions from untrusted websites, by using a white list of trusted websites.

The latest version of Firefox makes it very easy to install updates, updates are small in size and can be installed automatically while using the browser. To patch IE you need to use Windows Update, download no-so-small files, and in many cases, reboot the computer.

I don't think that Firefox will be targeted when/if (hopefully when ) it becomes more popular. The Open Source Apache web server is more popular than MS IIS according to Netcraft, it runs 70% of the web, and still, IIS gets much more exploits and viruses than Apache, and Apache gets fixes faster.

MS products are usually less secure than alternatives, because of this, they are targeted.
aym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 08:46 AM   #7
Professional gadfly
 
doctorgonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,364
Send a message via MSN to doctorgonzo
Quote:
Originally posted by aym_7
IE runs unsafe VB scripts and ActiveX controls, the source of like 99% of malware.
That's the key issue. Could Firefox have some security issues like unknown buffer overruns somewhere? Sure. But only IE allows viruses to automatically download and install themselves while you are browsing. There may be problems with the implementations in Firefox, but it's security model is a whole lot more secure from the start because it doesn't allow viruses to install themselves.
doctorgonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 03:33 PM   #8
Certified Audio Nut
 
Hi Ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,202
Send a message via MSN to Hi Ho
Quote:
IE runs unsafe VB scripts and ActiveX controls, the source of like 99% of malware.
Why don't they just get rid of them then? Other browsers seem to have no trouble without them. Why not eliminate the cause of so many problems?
__________________
"I'm not lying. I'm writing fiction with my mouth." - Homer Simpson My Miscelaneous Gallery
ASUS P7P55D PRO / Intel Core i7 860 / 8GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 RAM / OCZ Vertex 2 120GB SSD / Seagate 1TB 7200.12 / Asus Radeon 5870 1GB / LG Super-Multi 22x SATA DVD-RW / Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit / Cable Modem / HT Omega Striker 7.1 Sound Card / FSP 700W PSU / Logitech MX1000 Wireless Laser Mouse / Asus 24" 16:9 LCD w/Webcam / Axiom Audiobyte 2.1 Speakers

Last edited by Hi Ho; 07-02-2004 at 03:46 PM.
Hi Ho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 03:44 PM   #9
aym
Registered User
 
aym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,965
Quote:
Originally posted by Hi Ho
Why don't they just get rid of them then? Other browsers seem to have no trouble without them. Why not eliminate the cause of so man problems?
Because of the brilliant idea of integrating the browser into the OS, IE's rendering engine is used every where in Windows and not just for web browsing.

For example, without ActiveX, Windows Update won't work any more.
aym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004, 08:14 PM   #10
Certified Audio Nut
 
Hi Ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,202
Send a message via MSN to Hi Ho
ZDnet - Microsoft posts work-around for IE flaw

Hmmm... Looks like they're already looking to change that.
Hi Ho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0