Go Back   PCMech Forums > General & Off Topic > General Discussion

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-21-2005, 08:24 PM   #1
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Have the news on? An airliner over LAX is having trouble

Got the news on and they just said that an airliner is dumping fuel to possibly crash land at the LAX airport due to landing gear problems. Caught only brief info on it, but the plane is circling and will be landing in about 10 minutes they said...

I hope they land OK....
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 08:39 PM   #2
It can never be too quiet
 
Stryker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 1,090
My goodness... another airbus? (A-320)

I just turned it on when I read your message TR. After getting a first-hand view of the A-340 that went down at Pearson in Toronto, this stuff scares the you-know-what out of me.

I can't imagine how the individuals and crew on the plane are feeling. I hope everything goes smoothly.
Stryker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 08:43 PM   #3
Wx geek
 
blue60007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
Yep, just heard it a while ago- not sure what the latest is - CNN keeps talking about Rita...
__________________
"It is the way of man to make monsters and it is the nature of monsters to destroy their makers."
blue60007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 08:45 PM   #4
It can never be too quiet
 
Stryker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 1,090
Looks like the front landing gear is jammed. They will have to land on the rear gear and put the nose down gently. Scary stuff.


Edit: my mistake... they just said it's an A-310, not an A-320 as I said in my previous post.

Last edited by Stryker; 09-21-2005 at 08:47 PM.
Stryker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 08:51 PM   #5
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
Good God - I really hope for a safe landing. Few minutes remaining.

kram
__________________
"For today, goodbye. For tomorrow, good luck. And forever, Go Blue!"
University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman
kram 2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 09:20 PM   #6
Wx geek
 
blue60007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,638
UPDATE!! It just landed successfully!!!!

Last edited by blue60007; 09-21-2005 at 09:23 PM.
blue60007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 09:21 PM   #7
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
They are doing inspections right now - hopefully, they can evacuate safely.

kram
kram 2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 09:21 PM   #8
~ Ryan ~
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Jackson TN
Posts: 3,516
Send a message via AIM to rspassey Send a message via MSN to rspassey
A litle fire on the front wheel, but prefect landing besides that, and the fire didnt cause anything else to go wrong. Phew.
__________________
RiotCats.com, an internet domain specifically fabricated and visually erected for the appreciation of the feline kingdom!
rspassey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 09:28 PM   #9
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
YaaHoo!! Yes, what a perfect landing!! Right on the white center line! Everything seems safe and they didn't have to do an "emergency" evacuation: they are pulling up ramps now to get all those scared folks off. (I know my heart would be pounding like crazy)
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 09:51 PM   #10
Certified Audio Nut
 
Hi Ho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,202
Send a message via MSN to Hi Ho
I was watching that on the local news. I'm glad it turned out to be OK.
__________________
"I'm not lying. I'm writing fiction with my mouth." - Homer Simpson My Miscelaneous Gallery
ASUS P7P55D PRO / Intel Core i7 860 / 8GB Mushkin DDR3 1600 RAM / OCZ Vertex 2 120GB SSD / Seagate 1TB 7200.12 / Asus Radeon 5870 1GB / LG Super-Multi 22x SATA DVD-RW / Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit / Cable Modem / HT Omega Striker 7.1 Sound Card / FSP 700W PSU / Logitech MX1000 Wireless Laser Mouse / Asus 24" 16:9 LCD w/Webcam / Axiom Audiobyte 2.1 Speakers
Hi Ho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 11:33 PM   #11
Member (14 bit)
 
bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Christmas, Florida
Posts: 10,654
and to think that all the passengers were able to watch it on cnn all the time during the epsode.
cnn just announced that.
bailey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 11:35 PM   #12
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by bailey
and to think that all the passengers were able to watch it on cnn all the time during the epsode.
cnn just announced that.
For the most part, I'm sure they were - but during the landing, as usual, the television is turned off.

kram
kram 2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 06:25 AM   #13
RJ
Member (14 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Offenbach/Main (Germany)
Posts: 8,485
Send a message via ICQ to RJ
Saw it on the news. It was an A320 (btw, they can't dump fuel). . good that it could be landed safely.

RJ
__________________
All's right with the world when your PC is working right.
RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 07:14 AM   #14
It can never be too quiet
 
Stryker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 1,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ
... It was an A320 ...
Thought so.
I guess I should have stuck with my original instinct in my first post.
That's what I get for listening to a reporter.

I captured the footage with my capture card to have a look at it after. Although it's a very scary situation, it's incredible that the pilot kept it as straight as he did. I've watched it a couple of times in awe of the precision that it takes to land an airliner, never mind an airliner with malfunctioning landing gear!

The ATC tower was commenting that the pilot was calm and collected the entire time. Yes I know they are trained for these situations, but actually experiencing one is a different story I'm sure. Just incredible!
Stryker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 11:06 AM   #15
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 313
Send a message via MSN to LA22
They were flying around above the airport for a while until almost all the gas was gone, then they made the landing.
__________________
First Build
MSI K8N Neo4, AMD 64 3200+, 1GB Corsair VS, eVGA 6600GT, XClio 450w psu, ThermalRock case
LA22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 11:12 AM   #16
Gremlin Overlord
 
Jaggannath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ
It was an A320 (btw, they can't dump fuel)
RJ
That's kinda ridiculous if you ask me...
Jaggannath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 11:22 AM   #17
Techphile.
 
David M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 5,746
I am wondering why they would design this non-feature (inability to dump fuel) into a commercial aircraft. It seems dangerous not be able to reduce the size of a possible fire upon a less than ideal landing situation. I believe the 747 must be below a certain weight to land safely and therefore has the ability to dump fuel.

I hope they got "I survived my Airbus flight" T-shirts.
__________________
Asus P8P67 WS Revolution | Intel 2600K @ 4.7 GHz | Win 7 Pro 64 |8 gigs Corsair 1600 | Two Diamond 6990's in Crossfire| Corsair AX1200 | Thermalright Silver Arrow | Western Digital Black 2TB 64 meg cache | Lian-Li PC-A71B | Logitec Z-5500 | Three Asus 26" VW266H monitors running under Eyefinity |

Last edited by David M; 09-22-2005 at 11:48 AM.
David M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 02:21 PM   #18
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
 
Panama Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,538
Send a message via AIM to Panama Red
This incident gives new meaning to "technology terror". Because they could not dump the fuel, they were force to circle for nearly 3 hours to burn the fuel off. During that time the passengers were watching the news channels on an in-flight Direct TV service. How would you like to be helplessly sitting for 3 hours listening to the morbidity of the news folks as they projected the hypothetical landing/crashing scenarios? Yikes!!
__________________
Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history,
with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.
Panama Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 03:15 PM   #19
Member (0 bit)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: I can't remember
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stryker
it's incredible that the pilot kept it as straight as he did.
Balls of steel.

Glad there weren't anyone hurt.
__________________
Celeron 340 3.71ghz | ASUS P4P800-E Deluxe Mobo | 2x512mb Supertalent PC3200 RAM | ATI X850XT 256mb | WD Raptor 36gb | Maxtor 250gb SATA | Maxtor 250gb UATA | Antec TruePower 480w PSU | MadDog 16xDVD-RW | SF-201T Case | 17'' Apple Studio Display
zelira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 05:59 PM   #20
RJ
Member (14 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Offenbach/Main (Germany)
Posts: 8,485
Send a message via ICQ to RJ
Quote:
I am wondering why they would design this non-feature (inability to dump fuel) into a commercial aircraft. It seems dangerous not be able to reduce the size of a possible fire upon a less than ideal landing situation. I believe the 747 must be below a certain weight to land safely and therefore has the ability to dump fuel.
On smaller aircraft, such as the 737 or A320 family, the max. T/O weight and the max. landing weight don't differ much, it should be able to land that aircraft even with max. T/O weight (at least once, for emergency. . not regularly), therefore they aren't equipped with a fuel jettison mechanism.

RJ
RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 09:41 PM   #21
Gremlin Overlord
 
Jaggannath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Ah OK thanks RJ, didn't realise that. I still think its a bit ridiculous though, it leaves the pilot with very few options
Jaggannath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 02:07 AM   #22
Member (13 bit)
 
Floppyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,789
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/22/air....ap/index.html

Wow......hats off to the pilots for safe landing.
Floppyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 05:16 AM   #23
Member (9 bit)
 
pc master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: U.K
Posts: 357
Makes a change from all the boeing crashes recently. Airbus must make safer planes or care more about maintainance procedures the boeing.
pc master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 07:45 AM   #24
Gremlin Overlord
 
Jaggannath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Or maybe there's just more Boeings...
Also, most of the planes that crash are run by penny-pinching, low cost companies. The inference between Boeing and Airbus maintenance has more to do with the companies, and less to do with the model of aircraft

Last edited by Jaggannath; 09-24-2005 at 07:48 AM.
Jaggannath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 08:35 AM   #25
Security Dude
Staff
 
kstatefan40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Derby, Kansas
Posts: 999
Send a message via AIM to kstatefan40 Send a message via MSN to kstatefan40 Send a message via Yahoo to kstatefan40 Send a message via Skype™ to kstatefan40
I watched the landing, and I have to say, hats off to the pilots and crew of that craft. My dad is a flight instructor, so I've been around aircraft all my life. That landing was *perfect*.
__________________

Tyler A. Thompson
Small Business Networking Services Specialist
tyler@derbydigital.com
kstatefan40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 12:50 PM   #26
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
 
TwoRails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
Don't want to make this an AMD / Intel war... err, I mean, a Boeing / Airbus war, but the news said that the landing gear messing up like that is not an isolated incident. It has happened on other occasions, but Airbus doesn't feel it happens enough to warrent any action on their part.

Just think it it wasn't such a perfect landing... and folks did get hurt or worse. Imagine the trouble Airbus would be in, having prior knowledge of the problem.
TwoRails is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 04:47 PM   #27
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by kstatefan40
I watched the landing, and I have to say, hats off to the pilots and crew of that craft. My dad is a flight instructor, so I've been around aircraft all my life. That landing was *perfect*.
For being a fairly new airline company, the flight staff was said to be very professional and calm. While I will still continue to fly AA (and their almost-all-Boeing fleet), I appluad the staff as well.

kram
kram 2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 05:26 PM   #28
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,525
To be honest with ya.... I had no doubts the plane would come down safely.... with the wheel sideways like that... worst case scenario would be the nose wheel collapses under the sudden strain and the plane skids to a stop on its nose.... I would be more worried if that nose wheel was say steering off 30-40 degrees to one side instead of nearly 90 degrees... there would be a major tendancy for the plane to want to veer off the runway and create a real mess.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News

-Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me...
taking the glide path instead.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2005, 09:18 PM   #29
Gremlin Overlord
 
Jaggannath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoRails
Just think it it wasn't such a perfect landing... and folks did get hurt or worse. Imagine the trouble Airbus would be in, having prior knowledge of the problem.
Airbus would just blame the pilots or the maintenance staff, like they always do
Jaggannath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2005, 05:14 AM   #30
RJ
Member (14 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Offenbach/Main (Germany)
Posts: 8,485
Send a message via ICQ to RJ
Well, they are right about that. Airbus or Boeing can't be blamed for poor maintenance of the airlines. Their planes are safe.

RJ
RJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0