Go Back   PCMech Forums > General & Off Topic > General Discussion

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-29-2005, 04:14 PM   #1
The Preacher Man
Premium Member
 
SARGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,165
National Championship

Any bets on the game? My 'horns finally made it and Vince may have to do his "Texas two-step" to keep it close. I believe if both teams play their game and give it their best, it should be a great game. If one time doesn't show up mentally, it's a goner. I believe USC is ripe for picking and Texas has the tools to do that.
__________________
"Don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out."
SARGE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2005, 04:39 PM   #2
Member (11 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Amazin Caucasian
USC is definitely beatable, ND should have won, I just don't think Texas is consistent enough and if Vince doesn't have a good game they have no one to fall back on, where USC if leinart isnt playing well fall back on bush or vice versa, my opinion USC.

I'm goin to the Fiesta Bowl, I'm actually leaving tomorow for it, but any picks? I think ND!! Go Irish!! (I'm a huge ND fan, my sis goes there too)
__________________
Thermaltake Tsunami | Asus A8N-E | AMD Athlon 64 3500+ Venice | WD 74GB Raptor | 2 x Seagate 120 GB | 2GB (4 x 512mb) Corsair ValueSelect | eVGA Geforce 6800 gt | Audigy 2 ZS | XCLIO 450watt | NEC 3520a DVD-Burner | Sony 1.44mb Floppy
Amazin Caucasian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2005, 09:32 PM   #3
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
 
mbossman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,453
USC starts slow...a quick starting team with a good pass defense can shut them down...
__________________
Veritas Principium Libertas
mbossman2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2005, 10:17 PM   #4
Member (10 bit)
 
tigstah's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MS
Posts: 828
i cant believe i am pulling for a team from texas....considering i am a skins fan.
GO LONGHORNS!!!!!
__________________
R.I.P. #21 Sean Taylor 1983-2007
GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN
tigstah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2005, 10:29 PM   #5
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
 
Panama Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,654
Send a message via AIM to Panama Red
I haven't had the opportunity to see the 'horns in action this year, only highlights. But I did get to see SC and they are scary fast! That back field has three guys that can hurt ya plus some pretty decent receivers. I keep hearing the commentators touting the SC defense but I wasn't that impressed. I can see a 28 - 24 win for SC.
__________________
Getting old is not for sissies!
Panama Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2005, 11:50 PM   #6
Professional Cow Tipper
 
juppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Enid, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,873
Well, normally I'd have to say I still think USC is the better team, if for nothing more than consistency. If Vince is having a good game though, I think Texas will pull out the win. Being an OU Sooner fan, I can't believe I'm actually pulling for Texas to win, but hey, they're in our Big 12 conference so I guess it's "GO HORNS!" for me in the championship game. It's time somebody knocked USC off their pedestal, and this seems to be the year for upsets (Nebraska over Michigan 32-28, OU over #6 Oregon 17-14), so I'll be on your side for this game, Sarge.
__________________
Excellent guess, Kreskin! Wrong...but excellent.
*quote from Space Quest 6*
juppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2005, 12:05 AM   #7
Member (11 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Amazin Caucasian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panama Red
I can see a 28 - 24 win for SC.
no way, the defenses on both sides are nothing special, with two high scoring offenses and avergae defenses equal a high scoring game, but i do agree i think it will be close.
Amazin Caucasian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 02:06 AM   #8
Member (5 bit)
 
shady_72002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dover, OH
Posts: 19
I'm still bitter about my Buckeyes losing to 'em, but I'm going for Texas. Everybody loves the underdog.
shady_72002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 04:27 PM   #9
Member (11 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Amazin Caucasian
AH, what a disappointment (Fiesta Bowl). The worst part is, OSU didn't beat us. We beat ourselves. We played terrible, dropped passes, missed tackles, missed covers, stupid penalties...terrible.
Amazin Caucasian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2006, 04:42 PM   #10
Member (10 bit)
Premium Member
 
Strider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Burb of Detroit, Mi
Posts: 877
I think USC will win for the simple reason that Ohio State should have beat Texas (Although I glad they didn't for that was my only bright moment of the football season being a Universty Of Michigan Fan) and Texas really didn't play anyone of importance after that. However, I would be happy if Texas won, but since my Wolverines stank this year I have no prefrence.
__________________
Website Design, Flash, and Video Effects all done here at http://www.pepster.com
Strider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 09:28 AM   #11
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 162
Go Horns!!

Wife went to Texas and I am a Texas fan. She might be a bigger fan than I am, she went to work at 6:00 a.m. just so she would get home in time for the game. I think USC is a power house and I don't think too many teams can bring them down. I am an OU fan, don't tell the wife, and USC took OU down with out any problem. Therefore I don't know what to expect tonight. Bush is a freak, he has an extra gear that no one else has.

But if there is a team to beat USC I think it is Texas. It will have to be the Vince Young show. And lets not forget Texas has one of the top ranked defense in the nation. Only problem with that is there run defense is the only weak link, and you really don't want that problem with Bush. Man I can't wait. Can you imagine how those players' day is going today.

We tried to get tickets, but decided we would like to retire some day. Our freinds went $1100 a ticket. I will watch it in HD with a nice couch and cold beer. A little cheaper than a two plane tickets and two tickets to the Rose bowl.

Go Horns!!!


Thought I would through in this link: http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/5218314

Last edited by Litespeed; 01-04-2006 at 09:36 AM.
Litespeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 05:10 PM   #12
Audio/Video Expert
 
SonicVanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,625
The problem with USC is they use a modified spread offense. Very few defensive alignments can handle what the spread can do - look at Notre Dame, three losses all to teams that use the spread or power spread offense (MSU, USC, OSU). USC makes life very difficult in that they will switch from the spread to the power spread from series to series or even down to down - that makes defending them that much more difficult. Notre Dame learned their lesson against MSU and almost had USC - but USC switched the spread over to the power spread in that last series and ND couldn't adjust in time.

USC has too many weapons for the Horns.
__________________
Dave.

Go where there is no path and leave a trail.
SonicVanguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 06:16 PM   #13
Member (11 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,033
Send a message via AIM to Amazin Caucasian
MSU game was bs...no way should ND have lost. This thread will be resolved in a few hours!!
Amazin Caucasian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 08:53 PM   #14
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
 
Panama Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,654
Send a message via AIM to Panama Red
Right now it's 16 - 7, Texas in front. USC better learn how to tackle and cover in the secondary or this spanking will continue! Nice D, Horms!!

Last edited by Panama Red; 01-04-2006 at 08:56 PM.
Panama Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 09:11 PM   #15
Audio/Video Expert
 
SonicVanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazin Caucasian
MSU game was bs...no way should ND have lost. This thread will be resolved in a few hours!!
'Scuse me? Granted MSU's D gave up 21 early unanswered points in the 2nd half, but MSU outplayed ND in every way in that game. I saw it first hand.
SonicVanguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 09:18 PM   #16
Audio/Video Expert
 
SonicVanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panama Red
Right now it's 16 - 7, Texas in front. USC better learn how to tackle and cover in the secondary or this spanking will continue! Nice D, Horms!!
I've got to admit, I haven't seen Texas play until tonight - very impressive D. But Lienart is a student of the game - if he an hurry up his play calling and keep Texas from masking their D, USC can get back in the game. But USC's D has got to show up in the 2nd half for them to even have a chance. And it certainly helped that the Big10 officials are as blind in this game as they are during Big10 play - Young's knee was down and that lateral was more forward than lateral. And it wasn't even reviewed - big, big miss. And if it comes down to those 6 points, it will be another tarnish on the BSC.

On a side note, is anyone sick of Keith Jackson? He's blown names, facts, anounced wrong downs - he's just terrible. I've never been a Dan Foust fan, but I really feel for Foust having to cover for Jackson's constant miscues.
SonicVanguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 09:27 PM   #17
Member (7 bit)
 
weremonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicVanguard
I've got to admit, I haven't seen Texas play until tonight - very impressive D. But Lienart is a student of the game - if he an hurry up his play calling and keep Texas from masking their D, USC can get back in the game. But USC's D has got to show up in the 2nd half for them to even have a chance. And it certainly helped that the Big10 officials are as blind in this game as they are during Big10 play - Young's knee was down and that lateral was more forward than lateral. And it wasn't even reviewed - big, big miss. And if it comes down to those 6 points, it will be another tarnish on the BSC.
I'm pulling for the Horns, but, i know how good USC is, so its stilll no closed deal. And the Horns didnt play their best in the first half either, they had some problems, although they were able to overcome them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicVanguard
And it certainly helped that the Big10 officials are as blind in this game as they are during Big10 play - Young's knee was down and that lateral was more forward than lateral. And it wasn't even reviewed - big, big miss. And if it comes down to those 6 points, it will be another tarnish on the BSC.
Knowing both teams, it probably wont, but, if it does, your right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicVanguard
On a side note, is anyone sick of Keith Jackson? He's blown names, facts, anounced wrong downs - he's just terrible. I've never been a Dan Foust fan, but I really feel for Foust having to cover for Jackson's constant miscues.
Thats the one thing that i really havent liked, the commentators.
weremonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 09:30 PM   #18
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
 
Panama Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,654
Send a message via AIM to Panama Red
KJ is probably one of the most revered and knowledgeable announcers of college football. Problem is, he's past his prime and has lost his edge. When he called the first Texas extra point "Good!" as the zebras were waving the "no good" sign, it was clear he isn't the Keith Jackson of old. Time to retire I'm afraid.
Panama Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 11:24 PM   #19
HOT ROD
 
lil Jimmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
Horns #1
__________________
Fast enough 2 get by.....old enough 2 know what not 2 try -You know it was me
lil Jimmie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 11:25 PM   #20
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
 
Panama Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,654
Send a message via AIM to Panama Red
Sarge, you got your wish! Longhorns win! What a great game. Vince Young is one incredible football player. Congrats Texas fans.
Panama Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 11:26 PM   #21
Member (7 bit)
 
weremonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panama Red
Sarge, you got your wish! Longhorns win! What a great game. Vince Young is one incredible football player. Congrats Texas fans.
Ditto. One of the best games ive seen in a while.
weremonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 11:30 PM   #22
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 313
Send a message via MSN to LA22
What a great game. I am kinda pissed USC lost but Vince Young was amazing. How the heck couldnt USC stop him once. He ran in for TD's untouched from 17 yards out. Its ridiculous, IMO. But it was a good game.
Congratz Texas, and there Fans
__________________
First Build
MSI K8N Neo4, AMD 64 3200+, 1GB Corsair VS, eVGA 6600GT, XClio 450w psu, ThermalRock case
LA22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 11:36 PM   #23
Member (7 bit)
 
weremonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA22
What a great game. I am kinda pissed USC lost but Vince Young was amazing. How the heck couldnt USC stop him once. He ran in for TD's untouched from 17 yards out. Its ridiculous, IMO. But it was a good game.
Congratz Texas, and there Fans
well, it was the same reason why the Texas D couldnt really ever stop White... theyre just too good.
After watching this game, my opinions on Bush didnt change- he's not THAT much better than everyone else
weremonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2006, 11:57 PM   #24
Professional Cow Tipper
 
juppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Enid, OK, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,873
As for the officiating, yeah, most of the officiating crews in the bowl games this year have really blown calls. But I don't agree, even though Texas only won by 3 points, that the play where Vince's knee was down was the play that gave them the win. This will be the USC fan's side of it, but they seem to have already forgotten the interception that was ruled an incomplete pass later on in the game. The Texas player had possession, hit the ground, and THEN the ball came out. Losing the ball because of hitting the ground is never supposed to be ruled a drop or a fumble, because the player is already touching the ground (hence, he's down) by the time the ball comes out. After they ruled it an incomplete pass instead of an interception however, USC went on to score a TD on that drive too. So basically I see the two blown calls as offsetting and Texas still winning a legit win.
juppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 12:04 AM   #25
Member (6 bit)
 
blade13432's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 37
HOOK EM HORNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Last edited by glc; 01-05-2006 at 10:16 AM.
blade13432 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 12:11 AM   #26
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 162
Did Bush play? Is there any doubt on whom the MVP was for the game? He pretty much took the game in his hands in the last 2 minutes. It was nice to shut all the USC hype up.
Litespeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 03:38 AM   #27
Member (12 bit)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,509
I was glad to see someone knock USC down a notch. Too bad OSU didn't play Penn State and Texas the way the did against Notre Dame. I think they would have beat USC too.
jayb1234 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 09:11 AM   #28
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonicVanguard
I've got to admit, I haven't seen Texas play until tonight - very impressive D. But Lienart is a student of the game - if he an hurry up his play calling and keep Texas from masking their D, USC can get back in the game. But USC's D has got to show up in the 2nd half for them to even have a chance. And it certainly helped that the Big10 officials are as blind in this game as they are during Big10 play - Young's knee was down and that lateral was more forward than lateral. And it wasn't even reviewed - big, big miss. And if it comes down to those 6 points, it will be another tarnish on the BSC.

So you honestly don't think Texas would have scored on that drive any ways? They would have been on the 7 yard line. I hope the entire game gave you enough evidence that no matter what that call on that drive Young would have gotten the ball into the end zone by any means. And if you want to talk about laterals how about Bush's crazy lateral?

Tarnished by no means sir!! That was one of the greatest National Championship games in many many years.
Litespeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 10:46 AM   #29
 
Statica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
I've never been into College football before, but some of the games in this year's Bowls - especially this week - have been A-M-A-Z-I-N-G! It's been a lot of fun watching these photo-finishes.
Statica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 04:10 PM   #30
Audio/Video Expert
 
SonicVanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppy
As for the officiating, yeah, most of the officiating crews in the bowl games this year have really blown calls. But I don't agree, even though Texas only won by 3 points, that the play where Vince's knee was down was the play that gave them the win. This will be the USC fan's side of it, but they seem to have already forgotten the interception that was ruled an incomplete pass later on in the game. The Texas player had possession, hit the ground, and THEN the ball came out. Losing the ball because of hitting the ground is never supposed to be ruled a drop or a fumble, because the player is already touching the ground (hence, he's down) by the time the ball comes out. After they ruled it an incomplete pass instead of an interception however, USC went on to score a TD on that drive too. So basically I see the two blown calls as offsetting and Texas still winning a legit win.
Agreed. And ESPN and all the other sports sites have been critical of both calls.
SonicVanguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1