|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 105
|
is there a matrix..celeron vs. pentium III/IV (the real deal)
Wondered if there is a matrix(performance)available.
In other words comparing a 'real' PIII @850 is at or about the same 'performance' level as a celeron 1.0gig or what have you?...not that i'm an Intel fan, but it might come in handy for some. these numbers are arbitrary, i just threw them out there, for an example, there may be not such chips manufactured. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
PC Tinkerer
|
In synthetic benchmarks like Sandra and the rest, a Celeron 800 performs EXACTLY like a P3 800, given that the P3 is the 100MHz FSB variety. There may be a few instances, such as editing large pics in Photoshop, or something else like that, that you MIGHT see the P3 have a small advantage, but for cost, I'd stick with a Celeron any day. I have a P3 800, and if I knew then what I know now, I'd have a Celeron...
As far as a comparison grid, I don't know if one exists. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
|
When I still had a Celeron 800 in one system and a PIII 800 in the other, you couldn't visually see any difference. Running distributed.net, the Celeron was about 40,000 keys per second slower which is actually quite minimal.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|