Go Back   PCMech Forums > General & Off Topic > General Discussion

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-12-2002, 04:38 PM   #91
Member (11 bit)
 
RenegadeKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,487
And dos tells windows to start.

Either way, the installation installs a gui (unless by choice you choose not to), so you don't have to worry about whether it is truly a part of the os or not, as it comes with distros. And linux without a gui pretty much has a similar interface as dos, so if you can use dos then you can figure out linux with no gui. One of the toughest things about it used to be the installation, but that is not the case anymore.
__________________
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail."
RenegadeKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2002, 04:43 PM   #92
Member (11 bit)
 
Computer Hobbyist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Blue Springs, MO
Posts: 1,766
All this talk of GUI v. Non GUI sounds like it came directly from the Microsoft public relations department.

Whether an OS is graphic based or command line based with a GUI has more to do with the response speed and stability of the OS than ease of use. A graphic based OS, in theory, is quicker and more stable than a command line OS with a GUI, because it eliminates one layer of software activity. A GUI, by definition, shields the user from the command line by giving him something graphical with which to "interface." Microsoft has taken it to the extreme in ME, which at its heart is a DOS derivative (command line OS) with a GUI overlay. In ME Microsoft took the "DOS prompt" away from the user. It didn't take DOS away from the operating system. Operated at the command line a command line OS is just as stable and probably quicker than a graphical OS. A command line OS with a well written GUI is just as easy to use as a graphical OS.

CH

Last edited by Computer Hobbyist; 04-12-2002 at 04:52 PM.
Computer Hobbyist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2002, 04:48 PM   #93
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally posted by Computer Hobbyist
All this talk of GUI v. Non GUI sounds like it came directly from the Microsoft public relations department.

CH
i happen to work for microsofts pr... ok, just kidding. if i was working there, i would probably be killed for even mentioning the "L" word
__________________
Friends help you move. REAL friends help you move bodies. - me
quite possibly the best book ever written... by me
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2002, 12:02 AM   #94
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 156
Actually.... when I installed linux, I did not have any trouble at all. And that was over a year or so ago. They only problem I had was getting my modem to work. And it was a hardware modem. I guess I just couldn't get the right drivers. But I eventually got it to work.

I don't have a distro of linux on a machine right now but as soon as I build my new computer, I will probably put redhat on it. I think linux is very interesting, powerful, and important. I can't wait to get back into it.

Anyway, just thought I would throw that in.

Josh
minutrice is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2