|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
nVidia Dominance?
someone told me nVidia was trying to muscle out the cpu in computers? does anyone know anything about this? like, could a gpu become bigger than a cpu?
__________________
Friends help you move. REAL friends help you move bodies. - me quite possibly the best book ever written... by me |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
|
I don't see how that could happen, the CPU and GPU are two totally different things, they have different instructions and different purposes. Even if the GPU did have the ability to do CPU instructions, it would be much to slow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
i don't think it would be too slow. the new nvidia cards coming out have way more transistors than any p4.
i heard a while back about nvidia and amd combining forces to come out with the nforce, which is basically a cpu-like gpu used solely for multimedia applications. if the gpu were to get bigger and bigger (because really, display is where it's all at... it's what everyone sees, except for servers), the cpu's importance would shrink and shrink. i don't think it'd go away forever, but it might get pushed aside... i'll ask my friend where he got his info and maybe post it here |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
|
Well, if the GPU where on the board and tighly integrated into the bus between the memory and CPU, then it would definately take some of the load off of the CPU for multimedia tasks, but graphics isn't everything. A beefed up GPU wouldn't be of much use in a server, for example or a data processing machine. Otherwise, GPUs as they currently are on seperate cards would not be fast enough to replace the CPU.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
yea, i was actually referring to home use type stuff. i know servers would never be without cpus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
|
Actually, most gaming consoles are like that now, they have a slow CPU which is still needed, but the GPU is tighly integrated and does most of the work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
i've actually been thinking about this for a while. i knew gaming consoles have the slower cpu's and faster cards. i think cpu's could quite well become just another chip on a motherboard or something... everyone probably thinks i'm a crackpot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Professional gadfly
|
I don't think the GPU will ever totally replace the CPU. The relative strength between the GPU and CPU will be different depending on the application: stronger GPUs for game consoles, stronger CPUs for servers. The world is big enough for both of them, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Normal" again....??
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,600
|
Yea... I don't know about muscle out the CPU..... maybe try to muscle out the other GPU's in the market if anything.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 445
|
However they could conspire together so that only intel CPUs will work with nVidia GPUs or AMD and nVidia. They might not be able to muscle out CPUs but coordinated together could have some market dominance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
|
I think that would cause quiet an uproar in the hardware community.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
IF the PCU became "just another chip" we would loose AMD and Intel to see them replaced by every other company that cam make a chip(an all VIA or all nVidia MB). I don't think Intel/AMD would like that....
-Alan I think the nForce already is an AMD only chipset. IMOHO when you compare the size of a HSF needed for a CPU or a GPU - That shows the CPU is probbably doing more work(since it is sure makeing more heat). Logan
__________________
Main: Gigabyte GA-770T USB3 - Phenom II 840 - 4GB DDR3 - Radeon 5750 1GB HTPC: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 - Athlon II 250 - 4GB DDR2 - Radeon 5670 512MB HTPC: Zotac GeForce 6100E-E - Athlon X2 5800+ - 4GB DDR2 "Play a Windows CD backwards and you'll hear satanic voices, thats nothing, play it forwards and it installs Windows." |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 559
|
a computer cannot live on graphics alone.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Na it needs a sound card also! Who cares if you have the best card on earth, if you staticy sound??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
good point, a computer has way more to do then just graphics
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
i know a computer cannot live on graphics alone, but what i was sort of getting at is that an integration of cpu functions into a large and well designed gpu is quite possible. perhaps amd already sees this, and that's why they've tried buddying up to nvidia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Professional gadfly
|
Quote:
An alternative is to just slap both the GPU and CPU onto the same die. I can't think of a reason why you would want to do that, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
oh yea, i asked my friend where he got his info and he acted like he didn't know what i was talking about. i could've smacked him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
Who knows what will be developed in twenty years?
On-die gpu will probly be the norm, if they are there at all. I think the trend will be to grow the chips, using nanotechnology (kinda scarey stuff, that) to build ever smaller machines/circuits. What I have heard about the nforce chipset is that the technology was developed by nvid as there was to be an AMD xbox. Not just the Intel. They used the left over tech to develope the nforce. Uses the digital audio and the dual mem bus architecture from the xbox attempt. I like mine, but the performance is only slightly better than my 266A chipset. The audio and the game performance, wich is outstanding, sold me. There is one manufacturer who will use nforce exclusivley on AMD processors. Can't member who. I suppose that there is no reason that nvid could not enter the cpu market, they certainly have the technology and the facilities. Last edited by Blakhart; 06-21-2002 at 04:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,182
|
They have tried integrating the GPU into the CPU - any of you remember the Cyrix MediaGX? What a POS that was........
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
digitally confused
Premium Member
|
I like where homer15 is going. Kinda think-tanking the concepts of the true role of the CPU. I found it surprising that the GPU was actually getting so powerful it could take a big load from the CPU.
What other functions are committed to the CPU that other peripheals could take over to a degree? The sound board circuitry getting more sophisticated and powerful enough to do so? Any others? Come on, PCMech think-tankers, we can come up with some ideas! *music crescendoes in background as camera pans across the United States flicking to PC Mekk members at their keyboards going, "huh?"* Last edited by TimPoet; 06-22-2002 at 03:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
GLC- It was Cyrix, what could you expect?
![]() Logan |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,182
|
Hey Logan - you *do* know who owns Cyrix now, don't you?
![]() Hint - it's 3 letters and begins with V and ends with A. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,761
|
I see NVIDIA trying to muscle in on the MOBO market and muscle out VIA and SIS instead of the CPU market. The CPU market has become so competitive that the only players with any market share in North America are Intel and AMD, with AMD losing ground over the past year. The fact is that should they try to get into the CPU market Intel (alongwith some help from AMD) would probably crush the company into bankruptcy in no time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
digitally confused
Premium Member
|
Think they might have contracts with Intel and AMD that would prevent them from competing with them?
But the line of thought I was encouraging is purely technological. What improvements can be done to peripherals to take more tasks off of the CPU to free it up for more speed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
I would like to see a software defined cpu. Nothing more than a highly advanced, completely programmable digital signal processor that can use any core code, risc, whatever....
One that can use any and all instruction sets, or none. I guess that would be a like a human brain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|