Go Back   PCMech Forums > General & Off Topic > General Discussion

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-20-2002, 03:07 PM   #1
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
nVidia Dominance?

someone told me nVidia was trying to muscle out the cpu in computers? does anyone know anything about this? like, could a gpu become bigger than a cpu?
__________________
Friends help you move. REAL friends help you move bodies. - me
quite possibly the best book ever written... by me
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:11 PM   #2
Member (13 bit)
 
DrZaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
I don't see how that could happen, the CPU and GPU are two totally different things, they have different instructions and different purposes. Even if the GPU did have the ability to do CPU instructions, it would be much to slow.
DrZaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:18 PM   #3
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
i don't think it would be too slow. the new nvidia cards coming out have way more transistors than any p4.

i heard a while back about nvidia and amd combining forces to come out with the nforce, which is basically a cpu-like gpu used solely for multimedia applications. if the gpu were to get bigger and bigger (because really, display is where it's all at... it's what everyone sees, except for servers), the cpu's importance would shrink and shrink. i don't think it'd go away forever, but it might get pushed aside... i'll ask my friend where he got his info and maybe post it here
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:22 PM   #4
Member (13 bit)
 
DrZaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
Well, if the GPU where on the board and tighly integrated into the bus between the memory and CPU, then it would definately take some of the load off of the CPU for multimedia tasks, but graphics isn't everything. A beefed up GPU wouldn't be of much use in a server, for example or a data processing machine. Otherwise, GPUs as they currently are on seperate cards would not be fast enough to replace the CPU.
DrZaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:25 PM   #5
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
yea, i was actually referring to home use type stuff. i know servers would never be without cpus.
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:31 PM   #6
Member (13 bit)
 
DrZaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
Actually, most gaming consoles are like that now, they have a slow CPU which is still needed, but the GPU is tighly integrated and does most of the work.
DrZaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:38 PM   #7
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
i've actually been thinking about this for a while. i knew gaming consoles have the slower cpu's and faster cards. i think cpu's could quite well become just another chip on a motherboard or something... everyone probably thinks i'm a crackpot.
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:38 PM   #8
Professional gadfly
 
doctorgonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,364
Send a message via MSN to doctorgonzo
I don't think the GPU will ever totally replace the CPU. The relative strength between the GPU and CPU will be different depending on the application: stronger GPUs for game consoles, stronger CPUs for servers. The world is big enough for both of them, I think.
doctorgonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 03:51 PM   #9
"Normal" again....??
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,600
Yea... I don't know about muscle out the CPU..... maybe try to muscle out the other GPU's in the market if anything.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News

-Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me...
taking the glide path instead.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 09:06 PM   #10
Member (9 bit)
 
alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 445
However they could conspire together so that only intel CPUs will work with nVidia GPUs or AMD and nVidia. They might not be able to muscle out CPUs but coordinated together could have some market dominance.
alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 09:08 PM   #11
Member (13 bit)
 
DrZaius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 7,030
I think that would cause quiet an uproar in the hardware community.
DrZaius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2002, 10:55 PM   #12
Resident AMD enthusiast
 
Colonel Sanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
IF the PCU became "just another chip" we would loose AMD and Intel to see them replaced by every other company that cam make a chip(an all VIA or all nVidia MB). I don't think Intel/AMD would like that....

-Alan I think the nForce already is an AMD only chipset.

IMOHO when you compare the size of a HSF needed for a CPU or a GPU - That shows the CPU is probbably doing more work(since it is sure makeing more heat).

Logan
__________________
Main: Gigabyte GA-770T USB3 - Phenom II 840 - 4GB DDR3 - Radeon 5750 1GB
HTPC: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 - Athlon II 250 - 4GB DDR2 - Radeon 5670 512MB
HTPC: Zotac GeForce 6100E-E - Athlon X2 5800+ - 4GB DDR2

"Play a Windows CD backwards and you'll hear satanic voices, thats nothing, play it forwards and it installs Windows."
Colonel Sanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 12:03 AM   #13
Member (10 bit)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 559
a computer cannot live on graphics alone.......
mrjohnsonjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 10:30 AM   #14
Member (10 bit)
 
Sauron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Virginia, USA
Posts: 695
Send a message via MSN to Sauron Send a message via Yahoo to Sauron
Na it needs a sound card also! Who cares if you have the best card on earth, if you staticy sound??
Sauron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 11:03 AM   #15
Member (10 bit)
 
scott_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 927
Send a message via AIM to scott_d
good point, a computer has way more to do then just graphics
scott_d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 11:07 AM   #16
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
i know a computer cannot live on graphics alone, but what i was sort of getting at is that an integration of cpu functions into a large and well designed gpu is quite possible. perhaps amd already sees this, and that's why they've tried buddying up to nvidia.
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 11:13 AM   #17
Professional gadfly
 
doctorgonzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,364
Send a message via MSN to doctorgonzo
Quote:
Originally posted by homer15
i know a computer cannot live on graphics alone, but what i was sort of getting at is that an integration of cpu functions into a large and well designed gpu is quite possible. perhaps amd already sees this, and that's why they've tried buddying up to nvidia.
I don't think there is any reason for that to happen. The CPU has certain things to do, and so it can be tuned to do those things well. A GPU has different things to do, and it is tuned to do those things well. A one-size-fits-all approach probably wouldn't make things any more efficient.

An alternative is to just slap both the GPU and CPU onto the same die. I can't think of a reason why you would want to do that, though.
doctorgonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 11:27 AM   #18
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
oh yea, i asked my friend where he got his info and he acted like he didn't know what i was talking about. i could've smacked him.
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 11:57 AM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
Who knows what will be developed in twenty years?
On-die gpu will probly be the norm, if they are there at all. I think the trend will be to grow the chips, using nanotechnology (kinda scarey stuff, that) to build ever smaller machines/circuits.
What I have heard about the nforce chipset is that the technology was developed by nvid as there was to be an AMD xbox. Not just the Intel. They used the left over tech to develope the nforce. Uses the digital audio and the dual mem bus architecture from the xbox attempt. I like mine, but the performance is only slightly better than my 266A chipset. The audio and the game performance, wich is outstanding, sold me. There is one manufacturer who will use nforce exclusivley on AMD processors. Can't member who.
I suppose that there is no reason that nvid could not enter the cpu market, they certainly have the technology and the facilities.

Last edited by Blakhart; 06-21-2002 at 04:35 PM.
Blakhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2002, 06:53 PM   #20
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,182
They have tried integrating the GPU into the CPU - any of you remember the Cyrix MediaGX? What a POS that was........
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2002, 03:49 AM   #21
digitally confused
Premium Member
 
TimPoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,303
Send a message via AIM to TimPoet
I like where homer15 is going. Kinda think-tanking the concepts of the true role of the CPU. I found it surprising that the GPU was actually getting so powerful it could take a big load from the CPU.
What other functions are committed to the CPU that other peripheals could take over to a degree? The sound board circuitry getting more sophisticated and powerful enough to do so?
Any others?
Come on, PCMech think-tankers, we can come up with some ideas!

*music crescendoes in background as camera pans across the United States flicking to PC Mekk members at their keyboards going, "huh?"*

Last edited by TimPoet; 06-22-2002 at 03:53 AM.
TimPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2002, 04:18 AM   #22
Resident AMD enthusiast
 
Colonel Sanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
GLC- It was Cyrix, what could you expect?

Logan
Colonel Sanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2002, 05:54 AM   #23
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,182
Hey Logan - you *do* know who owns Cyrix now, don't you?

Hint - it's 3 letters and begins with V and ends with A.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2002, 06:03 AM   #24
Banned
 
morriswindgate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,761
I see NVIDIA trying to muscle in on the MOBO market and muscle out VIA and SIS instead of the CPU market. The CPU market has become so competitive that the only players with any market share in North America are Intel and AMD, with AMD losing ground over the past year. The fact is that should they try to get into the CPU market Intel (alongwith some help from AMD) would probably crush the company into bankruptcy in no time.
morriswindgate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2002, 09:17 AM   #25
digitally confused
Premium Member
 
TimPoet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,303
Send a message via AIM to TimPoet
Think they might have contracts with Intel and AMD that would prevent them from competing with them?

But the line of thought I was encouraging is purely technological. What improvements can be done to peripherals to take more tasks off of the CPU to free it up for more speed?
TimPoet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2002, 04:35 PM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
I would like to see a software defined cpu. Nothing more than a highly advanced, completely programmable digital signal processor that can use any core code, risc, whatever....
One that can use any and all instruction sets, or none.
I guess that would be a like a human brain.
Blakhart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2002, 11:41 AM   #27
Resident Slacker
 
homer15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally posted by Blakhart
I would like to see a software defined cpu. Nothing more than a highly advanced, completely programmable digital signal processor that can use any core code, risc, whatever....
One that can use any and all instruction sets, or none.
I guess that would be a like a human brain.
could you imagine having to "raise" your cpu by writing your own code for its operation? i'm pretty sure mine would like me at first, but then when it malfunctions and i get mad, it'll rebel and start to hate me, and get a tattoo.
homer15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2002, 11:46 AM   #28
 
Statica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
Quote:
Originally posted by Blakhart
I would like to see a software defined cpu. Nothing more than a highly advanced, completely programmable digital signal processor that can use any core code, risc, whatever....
One that can use any and all instruction sets, or none.
I guess that would be a like a human brain.
Almost like the transmeta crusoe? www.transmeta.com www.transmetazone.com
Statica is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1