|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Fly Eagles Fly
|
Rant
Just a pet peeve of mine, when people do things like that - a little to the extreme however, but it seems like it happens. It's not like I dislike the people that do that kinda thing, it's just that it seems so extremely wasteful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (12 bit)
|
Everyone has a way to spend their money. I guess, some people will always have to have the latest to be happy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fly Eagles Fly
|
agreed, kinda sad that way, but true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
I would do that if I had the cash, as technology interests me greatly. No probs mate, if folks didn't buy the latest stuff, we would have higher prices overall on everything else.
I know what you mean by the incremental increases, I am waiting for the makers to use light as the connecting bus for everything. Talk about speed and bandwidth. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Fly Eagles Fly
|
You got that right. How far off do you think it is?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,487
|
Quantum computers. Now those should be fast. (Utilizing more than 2 states of the electron or something like that). They've already built some really simple ones, nothing that could actually do anything, but they worked.
__________________
"When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a nail." |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,735
|
The funny thing is that those GF FX that will sell at 400 bucks will cost 40 within 3 years.
__________________
Darum still, füg' ich mich, wie Gott es will. Nun, so will ich wacker streiten, und sollt' ich den Tod erleiden, stirbt ein braver Reitersmann. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Fly Eagles Fly
|
yeah seriously.... oh well ... Someone should make a bell curve of optimal buying times for prices of different components .... it would display the best performance for the dollar or something like that.
Last edited by Fuze; 01-18-2003 at 10:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,735
|
That would be very useful indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,261
|
For myself I normally build the fastest or next to the fastest speeds available. Then I just use it for a couple of years or more. In the long run I probably spend less than the people that upgrade frequently even if they stay in the sweet spot of price/performance. I try to kepp at least one computer that is capable of running just about anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Gavel
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Upland, CA
Posts: 6,311
|
Fuze, quite a few folks have more money than brains.
__________________
"To speak ill of others is a dishonest way of praising ourselves" |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Blue Springs, MO
Posts: 1,766
|
LawyerRon is right. Some people do have more money than brains.
On the other hand I would rather somebody blow his money on a faster computer than on dope or something that might endanger others. Quantium Computer--There is a concept. Isn't that the computer that uses old coffee as a medium? CH |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|