Go Back   PCMech Forums > General & Off Topic > General Discussion

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-12-2003, 01:50 AM   #1
Member (12 bit)
 
Markoman01027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Easthampton, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,633
I hate it when this happens

Hey all,

I am stuck in a dilemma. I bought a P4 with hyper threading technology, and I just found out that my favorite Windows OS does not support it(Windows 2000) so I am forced to upgrade to Windows XP if I want to use HT.

I guess I don't really need to use HT, as the games that I am gonna be running and the programs wont need HT.

But still, I paid good money for the CPU, might aswell use it to it's full potential..damn..I am stuck
Markoman01027 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 02:02 AM   #2
HOT ROD
 
lil Jimmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
Personally I would have no problem going from 2K to XP so long as it was the PRO version. 2K is a great OS but I have to say XP has more to offer for me anyhow. If given the choice of 2K or XP Home I'd stay with 2K.
__________________
Fast enough 2 get by.....old enough 2 know what not 2 try -You know it was me
lil Jimmie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 05:16 AM   #3
Member (13 bit)
 
Confused's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Mt Washington, KY
Posts: 4,927
Quote:
Originally posted by lil Jimmie
Personally I would have no problem going from 2K to XP so long as it was the PRO version. 2K is a great OS but I have to say XP has more to offer for me anyhow. If given the choice of 2K or XP Home I'd stay with 2K.
I don't understand your reasoning. Only thing Pro offers over Home is dual processor support and ability to join a domain. Unless one has a need for either of those enhancements, then Home version is all you need. I run Pro but I got in on the MS Partening program that was offered couple of years ago and got my copy for $39.00.

For me the upgrade decision from 2000 to XP would not hinge on Home or Pro, but rather would it offer enough with the hyperthreading support to be worth it. Not being a gamer I have no idea. But I do believe the Home version is all one needs unless they are part of a domail or running a dual processor.
Chas
__________________
I may not be much, but I'm all I think about.
Confused is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 10:43 AM   #4
Member (11 bit)
 
raftero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: lometa,tx.
Posts: 1,399
i also got xp-pro on the program confused mentioned and i have home on another computer,i see no difference for home use,have wk2 on another and i really like the xp better(no real reason just preference).
raftero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 02:47 PM   #5
HOT ROD
 
lil Jimmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Confused
I don't understand your reasoning.
The biggest reason is "Simple File Sharing" you cannot set user rights on folders, files and drives with the Home version. Well you can set folder and file permissions on the drive/partition that XP Home is installed on but that's it.
lil Jimmie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 03:01 PM   #6
Member (13 bit)
 
M. A. Dockter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,130
Send a message via AIM to M. A. Dockter
Windows 2000 doens't support hyperthreading per-say. What it does do is detect your HT CPU as dual processors, which should function just the same.

We have done this to a group of 20 workstations here @ UWL with no problems at all.
__________________
Matthew A. Dockter
Contact me via email
M. A. Dockter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 03:15 PM   #7
HOT ROD
 
lil Jimmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
My understanding is Windows 2000 will detect it as a dual cpu but will not take advantage of the Hyper Threading technology.
lil Jimmie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 04:27 PM   #8
Member (12 bit)
 
Markoman01027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Easthampton, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,633
The Asus motherboard manual says to disable HT if you do not have Windows XP to not lose system stability.

So should I keep HT turned on even if I am gonna be running Windows 2000? TIA.
Markoman01027 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 03:20 AM   #9
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
I'm running HT on a couple Win2K boxes for a customer, no problems. Intel motherboards.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 03:48 AM   #10
Member (12 bit)
 
Markoman01027's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Easthampton, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,633
Thanks for the reply guys..

I looked at the box, and it said intel thermal solution. I looked at the heat sink, and I saw no thermal pad. All I see is a black square underneath the heat sink. That must be the thermal solution.
Markoman01027 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 10:46 AM   #11
Audio/Video Expert
 
SonicVanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,625
I was under the impression that to take advantage of a HT CPU, your motherboard also had to support HT technology and then the OS will "see" your CPU as a dual setup - as long as the OS supports dual CPU's.

Dave.
__________________
Dave.

Go where there is no path and leave a trail.
SonicVanguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 11:14 AM   #12
Served with Pride
Staff
Premium Member
 
Panama Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: near the left coast of Michigan
Posts: 14,536
Send a message via AIM to Panama Red
Found the following info at Intel. Clearly states XP Home and Pro only. Check it out.

http://support.intel.com/support/platform/ht/os.htm
__________________
Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history,
with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.
Panama Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 11:16 AM   #13
glc
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
 
glc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
Yes, the black patch is the thermal pad.
glc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 11:35 AM   #14
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,525
Quote:
Originally posted by lil Jimmie
The biggest reason is "Simple File Sharing" you cannot set user rights on folders, files and drives with the Home version. Well you can set folder and file permissions on the drive/partition that XP Home is installed on but that's it.
I'll have to argue that LJ.... boot XP Home to safe mode, log in as Adminastrator, then set your permissions. While not the most convenient way to do it.... I don't think Pro is worth the extra $100+CDN for that feature.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News

-Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me...
taking the glide path instead.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 02:11 PM   #15
HOT ROD
 
lil Jimmie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: On the Edge
Posts: 4,565
Why argue when I said you can set permissions with Home but it's limited.
lil Jimmie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2003, 02:55 PM   #16
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,525
But it's not limited, you just have to get to them differently.
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0