|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,439
|
i guess a video card that is 7 years old
has done me great duty...but it is time to replace my 16mb Nvidia card for something that is a little more up to date.
Couple this with the fact that my knowledge of video cards (as well as my interest in reading up on them ---network gear fills my available spare time) i am coming to ya'll to get some suggestions: I need a card that will operate in a 4x AGP slot and cost somewhere between $30 and $45 (yes, I am a cheap SOB and don't believe in buying on the cutting edge)...whats your advice? (mostly mid to low end gaming is the reason I need to upgrade) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
PCMech: Saving Lives
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England, the United Kingdom
Posts: 1,839
|
For $45 you can get a Radeon 9200se, although se is sometimes called slow edition with 128mb of ram it is bigger, and better than your current card. It is the only card I could find in your price range that supports DX8.1 http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...240-003&depa=0
If you want to stick to nVidia card then you can get a 64mb mx4000 card, but it only has DX 7 support so I would go for the above card. If you don't want the ati it is at http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...164-013&depa=0 What games do you plan on playing? Edit: For just $3 dollars more you can get a Sapphire card, they make good cards and so if you can stretch your budget higher I would go for that. Last edited by WhatsThisBoxFor?; 06-13-2004 at 11:21 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,439
|
---question deleted---
to me, as I am not cutting edge, absolute top performance is not a big issue, I am looking for good solid middle of the road, stable card. Most of the games I play are strategy rpgs etc...what has initiated this is I bought Star wars Knights of the old republic and it squawked at the video card. Edited to remove a really dumb question posed by a hung over brain Last edited by mbossman2; 06-13-2004 at 01:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,439
|
thanks guys
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 102
|
wait, one more
you may need this card....the mobo has no use for 8x does it?......that and being a legacy system you may need the bundled PCI slot adapter.... http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...135-129&depa=0 and it tops the chart here for FPS bucks http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...charts-16.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,439
|
the system has a 4x AGP slot...if I go with an 8X capabale card it will step down to deal with a 4x slot. yes? as you can see i tend to hold onto parts and pieces for a long time (for example this video card is on its 3rd mobo....currently a K7T MSI with an Athlon 1700+ and is the oldest component in the system)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
No, that's a GF4 MX440 on top of that chart - you linked to a GF2 MX400.
A 8X card works fine in a 4X slot, and only takes about a 2% performance hit, nothing you will ever notice. The Radeon 9200 is 3rd on that chart and is the highest current production card. That chart only considers FPS and there's a lot more to a video card than just that. ANY Radeon will *look* a lot nicer than anything Nvidia has ever produced, the difference in 2D color quality and display clarity is very noticeable. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|