|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
|
Well this review came as a surprise : http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...rike_source_2/
I've just added the pro to my short list as a possible upgrade card.
__________________
Asus M4A77D, 64 X2 6000+, 4 GB Corsair DDR2 800 ram, Radeon 5770. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
|
The Radeon X700 Pro seems to be a very viable contendor...I'm surprised myself. I'd say that the Radeon X700 XT should be something to look after too though - it is around the same price.
No intention of butting into your build, but the Radeon 9500 Pro is a solid card...I'm sure you can still play CS Source on that. kram
__________________
"For today, goodbye. For tomorrow, good luck. And forever, Go Blue!"
University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Computing Professor
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,718
|
Quote:
Basically I'm planning for the future, such as it is, for an AGP slot. At some point next year I will have to buy a card to see me through the next 2 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 7,835
|
It's better than half the competition - Radeon 9500 Pro at least places itself as one of the best 128-bit card in its generation
. I was desperately trying to get one an year ago until I saw the R9800 Pro on sale. Regardless and back on the subject, it is amazing how things have swithced...how AA and AF turned off would in fact benefit ATI cards where it would help nVidia cards.kram |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
GFX Techman
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The kingdom United
Posts: 1,316
|
Very nice card, I'd certainly consider that for an upgrade. I'm surprised how well Nvidia did in the tests as well, considering their traditional dislike of eye candy and the fact that Source was 'made using ATi, for ATi' like Doom3. It's really a matter of preference what card you get, especially considering the ridiculously small benchmark differences between each, well within the margin of error. I'd keep with the 9500. It'll do just fine, but at lower FPS (not noticeable to the human eye).
fedz
__________________
If it's broke, fix it If it ain't, overclock it ------------------------- http://img64.exs.cx/img64/309/mypc8ursmall2ts.png |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|