|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
08-09-2005, 07:36 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 976
|
Radeon: higher model or higher sub-rank?
I see different Radeon sub-ranks (SE, Vanilla, Pro, XL, XT, XT-PE) for every model but I also find that a lower model with a higher sub-rank can cost more than I higher model with a lower sub-rank.
For example: 1. SAPPHIRE RADEON X700 PCI-E 256MB Price: $164.45 CAD http://www.ncix.com/products/index.p...cture=SAPPHIRE 2. SAPPHIRE RADEON X600 PRO 256MB Price: $176.70 CAD http://www.ncix.com/products/index.p...cture=SAPPHIRE So what's better (not specifically these cards) a higher model or a higher sub-rank?
__________________
If you remind me of my dog... we'll probably get along. |
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 09:06 AM
|
#2 |
|
I like monkeys
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 2,508
|
The higher model will be better than the subrank. A whole new line is faster while the subranks are just modifications of that specific card.
__________________
Desktop 1: Intel i7 920--GA-x58-UD3R--Corsair xMS3 6GB (3 X 2GB) DDR3 1333mhz--Sapphire HD 4870 1GB--PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750w psu--WD SATA 3.0 gb/s 320 GB HD--Lite-on DVD-DL burner--Thermaltake SopranoRS black case--Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Desktop 2: Intel C2D E4400--GA-P35-DS3R--Corsair xMS2 2GB (2 X 1 GB) DDR2 800--eVGA 8600 GT--Fortron Source 500 watt psu--WD 250 gb HD--HP DVD-DL burner--Windows Vista Home Premium Laptop: Apple Macbook |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
