|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U.K
Posts: 100
|
Ge Force or Radeon
which do u think is better, i personally think Ge Force
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 684
|
I think it is personal preference. I use ait cards and have never had a problem. On one build I did install a GF2MX and it worked ok, just a little picky about drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Modesto,Calif
Posts: 4,042
|
For what I use a pc for, ATI all the way.
Carl |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,525
|
I hold a preference for ATI cards.... GF's are OK if you stay away from the MX's.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
|
I bought a GF4 Ti, since it was cheaper than the ATi I was looking at. For my upgarde/next build, I'll probably go ATi.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 221
|
what about direct x support? isn't that a significant difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Shiro Usagi
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
Posts: 34,002
|
Re: Ge Force or Radeon
Quote:
I prefer Matrox video cards. Cricket
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18
|
Matrix, omg! Those are great if you're into graphics design and such. But for gaming go Geforce all the way, best bang for your buck! Drivers, I believe nvidia still has better drivers but ATI has come a long way with their catalyst drivers so I give them props there and the 9700 pro, can't beat that card right now, probably the best card on the market right now. I'd like to wait for NV34 and see what that will do 1st. Most of the high end cards are overkill for most games now a days anyways!
For a budget go for the 9500 pro or the Geforce4 TI series and you can't go wrong. Paying over $200 for a card is nothing more than showboating to your friends or being able to post and brag to people on such boards as these. 3dmark scores, those are for the vain glory who just want to say, ha i scored more than you, it's a useless benchmark (only purpose is to boost someone's ego, hehe) DirectX 9, paying for something that can't be used yet is stupid, just wait till the end of the year and you can probably get a 9700pro for about $200 or maybe even less if NV34 will ever come out or the new ATI chip that's being rumored! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orinda, California
Posts: 1,863
|
I own a Radeon 9500 Pro and like it a lot. I hope you guys checked out the article on how to turn your 9500 into a 9700 pro. That was a wicked article even though I myself cannot convert (9500 pros can't be upgraded to 9700 pros).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Deltona, FL
Posts: 144
|
If you go GeForce, stay away from the MX chips!!! I've got an ATI Radeon 8500 and it rocks. I'm going to upgrade to a 9700 when they come down a little in price. If you go ATI, stay away from the 9000. Go 8500 if you're on a budget, or go 9500 or 9700 if you've got the cash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,735
|
Quote:
__________________
Darum still, füg' ich mich, wie Gott es will. Nun, so will ich wacker streiten, und sollt' ich den Tod erleiden, stirbt ein braver Reitersmann. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 221
|
so what exactly does it mean to have support for a directx version? i mean, i've been using a piece of crap onboard graphics chip in my hp for 4 years and i'm using either dx 7 or 8. is it possible that a card can completely not support a version or do certain ones just work better with higher versions??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U.K
Posts: 100
|
Which wud be best for gaming
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,735
|
For gaming? The Radeons all the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U.K
Posts: 100
|
wot graphics card have u got Nuclear Krusader
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Mondsreitersmann
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Skingrad
Posts: 8,735
|
Mine is an old card actually: GF3 Ti200. Supposedly I was getting the Radeon 9700Pro for my B-day, but the dollar parity went up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
The Procrastinator
|
What?! im confused:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 100
|
At any time on AoM's tech support forum there are several threads with something like "Radeon 9700 problem" while I have yet to see a "Geforce problem" for anything above a GF2 MX. So even though the best Radeon is faster, it doesn't seem to be as reliable as a Geforce 4 TI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U.K
Posts: 100
|
i3OSS
how much did your computer cost |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
Off topic, let's take inquiries such as that to PM or the General Discussion forum.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|