|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 327
|
Msi Ti4200 Vs Ati 9200
I'm looking to buy one of these 128mb cards. The MSI should be clocked at 257mhz memory and 250mhz core. I can't find the specs for the ATI 9200. Does anyone have the specs? Which one would you choose?
Regards Bugnut
__________________
They said technology was supposed to make life easier. Sure had me fooled. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (9 bit)
|
I would choose the MSI TI4200 in my own experiance I love the way they perform and they are very popular as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Computer Slave
|
I'd go with a the Ti4200 as well. My card performed very well until it died...but that's not that card's fault, just the manufacturer (*cough* avoid PNY *cough*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Deltona, FL
Posts: 144
|
I've read some poor reviews of the 9200. I'd go with the ti4200, or better yet, for the same price I'd get a Radeon 9600pro and have DX9 functionality. Just my opinion though.
__________________
My Box: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5600+ | MSI K9N Neo-F V3 | 2GB Corsair XMS 2 DDR2 | Seagate 250GB HDD | 512 MB ATI Radeon X1900XT | Lite-on DVD R/RW drive | Codgen ATX case w/ Thermaltake 480W PS |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,525
|
I have to agree... why are you comparing those two cards when the 9200 is considerably cheaper. Go with a 9600 for a better comparison price wise, then in my opinion, go with the 9600 for better performance.
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 327
|
So all agree that the 9600 is the better card. My local PC store has a few 9500 and 9500 Pro in stock as well as the 9600 and 9600 Pro. What would your choice be now?
Regards Bugnut |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 186
|
9600 pro for the beef, but you'll want to get a new motherboard to make full use of that agp 8x coz a k7s5a dnt support it!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 327
|
It seems I always finish last with this K7S5A.
Bugnut |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Computer Slave
|
I'd go with a 9500 over a 9600 if the choice came down to that. Not only is the 9500 faster than the 9600, it's possible to mod a 9500 non-pro into a 9700. I'm not saying go for the 9500 just because of that, but that is something to consider.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Deltona, FL
Posts: 144
|
The 9500's outperform the 9600's, but the 9600's run cooler and use less juice and they are also very overclocking friendly, even with stock cooling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,285
|
I've been told that the 9500 supports DX9, while the Ti4200 would not.
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: in harms way
Posts: 2,768
|
True, if you want dx9 then the 95/600 would be a good call. If you only do dx8 or lower games/apps, then the 4200 is the power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
snowboarder
|
the Ti4200 has so much graphics power, its a real diamond in the sea of sh*te that is the graphics cards of now
__________________
Antec Sonata - Abit IS7-E - P4 2.4/800 @ 3.0 - 1GB OCZ Gold DDR500 - FX5950 Ultra 256MB - Audigy 2 - WD JB 80GB - XP Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
I don't computer.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ellisville, MO
Posts: 1,541
|
Quote:
__________________
Gaming Rig - ASUS A8N-SLi Deluxe :: AMD 64 X2 4600+ :: 3GB Corsair XMS PC-3200 ASUS GeForce GTX 560 (Fermi) 1GB :: SB Xi-Fi Fatal1ty Pro 500GB WD Black :: Sony DVD-ROM :: Plextor 716SA DVD/RW OS - WinXP Pro :: Powered by - Enermax 535W PSU ASUS G60JX Laptop - Intel Core i5 M430 :: 4GB DDR3 NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M 1GB :: 500GB SATA HD (7200) OS - Win7 Home Premium 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
I don't computer.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ellisville, MO
Posts: 1,541
|
Oops, forgot to add that you should go with the MSI Ti4200. Great card! Not a big fan of the Radeon's.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 36,460
|
Depends on your priority - if gaming is your thing, get the 4200, if good graphics is, get a Radeon of some sort. The ATI has a better 2D display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Resident NORML Supporter
|
You won't even notice a difference with AGP 8x compared to 4x. Don't waste money on upgrading a motherboard just to use AGP 8x. Supposedly, even the bandwith of 4x isn't used fully, and benchmarks and tests show that using AGP 8x with the same card doesn't offer any noticable benefit compared to 4x.
__________________
Asus P5B-E - Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4 GHz - 2GB Corsair XMS2 - HIS X1650 XT Turbo - 400GB Seagate 7200.10 - Sound Blaster Audigy SE - Samsung 960BF LCD - Antec P180B - Corsair HX620W |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 9,138
|
BTW, the newer Ti4200's are 8x AGP. I have one
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
snowboarder
|
The big clue is in the name
Ti4200 8x its always nice to if you can though
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|