|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
10-24-2003, 04:30 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 611
 |
9800 XT and FX5950 Comparison @ X-Bit
A HUGE article/review of ATI and NVIDIA's new flagship cards, the ATI RADEON 9800 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...ra-9800xt.html For those of you who are too lazy to read it, ATI once again kicks butt! |
|
|
|
10-24-2003, 04:48 PM
|
#2 |
|
Aerospace
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: MN, USA
Posts: 1,177
|
One thing I thought was weird was in Tomb Raider The 9800 outperformed the Nvidia at 1600x1200. but in tomb raider 1600x1200 +FSAA x2 the Nvidia was able to outperform the ATi. Not just in 1600x1200 but all res. The Nvidias didnt slow down a bit and the ATis slowed down alot.
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2003, 08:43 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
I just read the conclusions (ya, feelin' lazy tonight
 ) and, gee no surprise there, eh? I've been an nVidia fan for a long time, but my next card will be ATI.
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2003, 10:52 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 611
|
Yeah, my AIW Radeon 9700 Pro card was my first non NVIDIA card...and unless NVIDIA pulls drastically ahead, I'm sticking with ATI.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
