|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
09-20-2002, 07:06 PM
|
#1 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,382
|
Question on JPG's
Does a JPG set at "progressive download" actually download faster?
__________________
There are two secrets to staying young, being happy, and achieving success. You have to laugh and find humor every day, and you have to have a dream.
|
|
|
|
09-21-2002, 01:35 AM
|
#2 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
From my understanding, No. It just appears to be loading faster because you can see the low res pop up quicker while the hi res is still D/Ling. A 100K download is just that, a 100K download.
TwoRails |
|
|
|
|
09-21-2002, 03:57 PM
|
#3 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,382
|
Darn.
|
|
|
|
|
09-21-2002, 06:04 PM
|
#4 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,771
|
If you want jpegs that download faster - you have 2 choices - resize them to make them smaller or compress them more.
|
|
|
|
|
09-22-2002, 01:15 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member (14 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Great NorthWest
Posts: 12,594
|
Some modern graphics editing programs do what glc suggest thru the use of jpeg Optimizer Wizzards. For example, Paint Shop Pro 7 has a Wizzard to help control the above and even gives an estimated download time.
TwoRails |
|
|
|
|
09-22-2002, 06:34 AM
|
#6 |
|
Barefoot on the Moon!
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 13,382
|
I've already fooled with JPG compression, and compressed teh images as far as I could without looking bad. I was just seeing if there were any other options in addition to that.
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
