|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
The Preacher Man
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,828
|
Browser, Browser, Browser
Seems like Coke vs. Pepsi, chocolate vs. vanilla, etc. I was a long-time fan of IE and its versions and even dabbled in Netscape. A particular somebody I know still uses an ancient NS. I currently have IE 6, the latest Opera at others' arm-twistin', and also Mozilla Firebird. I ain't used IE in a moon and it took some force. The Firebird is now my choice as it does what I want, blocks pop-ups and simply feels right.
http://texturizer.net/firebird/features.html
__________________
"Don't be so open-minded that your brains fall out." |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 288
|
I have always used IE but after clicking on the link you provided I think I will give firebird a whirl.Thanks for the link.
__________________
Win XP Home,Pent.4 (1.5 GHZ)40Gig WD Hardrive,512meg DDR ,Nvidia Geforce2 mx/mx400,SoundBlaster Live 5.1,Asus P4B266mobo.Memorex 12x 24x 52x cdrw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 181
|
Im just curious, I know Mozilla supports 128 bit encryption but ive never seen in written anywhere. Have you seen it anywhere Sarge? and why wouldn''t they at least mention it in the features list?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Retired
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Modesto,Calif
Posts: 4,048
|
Sarge,
Gosh Sarge, I didn't think I was twisting your arm about Opera! ![]() Carl |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Preacher Man
Premium Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Dallas
Posts: 4,828
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (6 bit)
|
interesting.. firebird uses about 16MB of memory at startup but each subsequent window only adds about 1.5MB and shows as only one application on task manager. IE actually uses 16MB for each window that's open and shows as separate processes in task manager.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tranquility
Posts: 112
|
I will wait until they tidy things up with Firebird first. At least they are correcting most of their Mozilla browser "features".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,760
|
I use Opera as my primary browser but I have Mozilla 1.4 also - which I hear is going to be the last version. I'll probably switch to Firebird when they get to the 1.x release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Professional gadfly
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (13 bit)
|
I stay away from betas as well.
I'm using Mozilla 1.4 now, started using the browser after the 1.0 version came out. How IE users survive without tabbed windows is beyond me, I love em .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Arlington, Tx
Posts: 343
|
I currently use 1.4, any news when Firebird 1x is due?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
You might also try out www.netcaptor.com. Another very interesting take on IE.
__________________
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=1][COLOR=Navy][CENTER]Intel Core2Quad Q9550; EP45-UD3R (rev 1.1); 4x2GB DDR2 800MHz; eVGA e-GeForce 9600GT KO 512MB DDR3; Seagate ST31000528AS 1T, Seagate ST3500320AS 500GB SATA II, Seagate ST3500418AS 500GB SATA II; LG GH22-NS50 DVD-RAM x 2; DELL SP2208WFP; Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit Palm LifeDrive Mobile Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 706
|
Been using Firebird .6 for a few days now. I Like it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|