|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
01-11-2001, 03:59 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 294
|
|
|
|
|
01-11-2001, 04:45 PM
|
#2 |
|
PC Tinkerer
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Long Beach, Mississippi
Posts: 2,090
 |
Woohoo! I just ran it 5 times, and my average was a truly pitiful 12.8 Kbps. That included a 3.7 and a 5.1. I told you guys my phone lines are a mess.
|
|
|
|
|
01-11-2001, 05:29 PM
|
#3 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 294
|
Mine was 921; hehe
|
|
|
|
|
01-11-2001, 06:06 PM
|
#4 |
|
Red-eyed Moderator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,576
|
My low was: 1942.9 Kbps / 238.1 K bytes/sec
__________________
-At Ford, quality is job #1, job #2 is making them explode. ~Norm MacDonald, SNL News -Switching to Glide..Balancing in my head..inside of me... taking the glide path instead. |
|
|
|
|
01-11-2001, 10:18 PM
|
#5 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,791
|
My highest was like 74.6 kilobits per second...LOL...not really acurate since I have a 56k modem on a dialup connection. Then it average around 48.6kbps/6k bytes/s not bad considering the highest dialup speed I can obtain is 49,333bps...with 48,000bps being the average. Looks like all that modem tweaking paid off, plus I got win2k running this and download speeds are faster in win2k than 98 anyway. So, yippee
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2001, 04:03 AM
|
#6 |
|
SQL nutcase
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,136
|
First attempt
Your line speed: 626.7 Kbps 76.8 K bytes/sec Second attempt Your line speed: 415.9 Kbps 51 K bytes/sec I don't think that is very accurate. (Could be the way the call is routed of course) |
|
|
|
|
01-12-2001, 06:36 AM
|
#7 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 294
|
I noticed that too,especially the first time you click on the link (one time it said my speed was 6800!). Clicking on the refresh button results in large changes in speed-- in my case from to 423 to 987. Why the differences?
|
|
|
|
|
01-12-2001, 07:04 AM
|
#8 |
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
|
It seems really screwed up at times..
Check out http://www.toast.net and click performance tests from the menu. Has been one of the more accurate ones |
|
|
|
|
01-12-2001, 08:20 AM
|
#9 |
|
Don't tread on me
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,121
 |
Not very accurate. Here's a T-1 at work.
Your line speed: 30.1 Kbps 3.7 K bytes/sec I got better than that on my 32k dial up at home.
__________________
Miami, flee it like a native. |
|
|
|
|
01-12-2001, 11:26 AM
|
#10 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 294
|
My T-1 connection at work is ranging from 431 to 1567. The numbers are all over the place (with tests run just seconds apart). Looks like this site isn't much help at all.
The Toast.net is providing me with consistent numbers (around 1200). |
|
|
|
|
01-13-2001, 03:33 AM
|
#11 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 310
|
Your line speed:
8160 Kbps 1000 K bytes/sec -On RR cable modem with 20000 set as recieve window in registry. |
|
|
|
|
01-14-2001, 07:58 AM
|
#13 |
|
Eggs anyone?
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,560
|
Your line speed:
1046.2 Kbps 128.2 K bytes/sec From my dsl at work, gonna compare with my cable connection at home. |
|
|
|
|
01-14-2001, 10:50 AM
|
#14 |
|
Perpetual Newbie
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: NY, US
Posts: 1,682
|
Mine similar to Floppy's:
49.9/6.1 Win2000/DiamondSupraExpress. |
|
|
|
|
01-14-2001, 08:32 PM
|
#15 |
|
Member (13 bit)
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,791
|
Hey Gintaras,
Doesn't surprise me we got the similar speeds. I'm using windows 2000 too and get my connection of my dad's comp's modem over ICS which is a Diamond Supra Express as well. The Diamond, although ISA, is still a great modem, works well for gaming too. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
