|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 5,538
|
<I>Mandrake in Trouble</I>
It looks like Mandrake's CEO has resigned and the company is not in good financial shape. The talk is of laying off their development team.
Full Story |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 355
|
sorry, a little off topic, I know...but is this statement from the article a little strange to anyone else?
Quote:
how does FreeBSD figure into Linux sales? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 5,538
|
I often see it in the Linux category. I guess that they don't want to put it in it's own category nor in the Unix category so it gets thrown in with Linux. It is also suprising to see SUSE so high. The funniest thing of all is the word sales in all of this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 355
|
sales is a decent enough term, considering they have it packaged as a product, although I've been told that SuSE's support program shouldn't be categorized as such. SuSE doesn't suprise me so much. Fry's always has a copy of SuSE, Mandrake, Caldera and Red Hat. the suprise to me is that Caldera has let itself be that low.
as for bunching FreeBSD into the group, that's about the same as throwing OS/2 in with Windows sales by version. maybe they should think about changing the name they use to categorize all of the free OSes under. as for Unix sales, that would most likely be Solaris on top, AIX next, HP-UX trailing and SCO, IRIX and the others way below. maybe Caldera's picked up SCO's defeatist attitude in their dealings with them. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|