|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
AMD Semprons for Ubuntu Build
I'm putting together a list of CPU's that i'd like to use for my budget 'buntu-box.
What do you think of the AMD Sempron Series? In particular, i'm looking at the Sempron 2800, 3000 and 3400. The 2800 and 3000 have a small difference in price (30-40$), but @70 dollars the 3400 is about 40 extra. Would it be worth it to splurge for the 3400? The 2800 is really at a sweet price point, but is 1.6ghz - is this a little bit too behind the times, or will it (as I suspect) agree with linux just fine? This machine will most likely be used for basic office tasks. All three processors seem to have gotten good reviews on Newegg, but i'd appreciate any user experiences and input. Thanks. Sempron 2800: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819104245 Sempron 3000: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819104241 Sempron 3400: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819104231 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
The operating system has nothing to do with what processor you choose. For a basic office computer, you can use whatever processor you want with whatever operating system you want and it should run fine. I build basic office machines with Celerons, so Semprons should be fine. I still have customers using Pentium 3's in their offices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,563
|
I'd personally go for the 3000+ Ubuntu isn't a heavyweight operating system, but it's not a total 'lightweight' either. How much RAM you install will make the biggest difference - I'd recommend 512MB or more.
FK
__________________
-FK- "Take up our quarrel with the foe: To you from failing hands we throw, The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die, We shall not sleep, though poppies grow, In Flanders fields." - John McCrae, May 1915 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Come in Ray...
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,668
|
A Ubuntu machine should have the same hardware considerations as an XP machine... with the exception of trimming back on the graphics card, as Ubuntu isn't a gaming system.
You can definitely get away with only 512 MB of memory in Ubuntu because there is no need to have anti-virus or anti-spyware programs running in Ubuntu. Of course if your budget allows for a Gig, it wouldn't hurt. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
Thanks guys. It's good to know that each one of these processors would make good candidates for my build. As FK mentioned, perhaps it might be prudent to strike a middle ground with the Sempron 3000, although i've read in a few places that the 2800's seem to be doing fine as well.
Quote:
Could I get your opinions on a few other crucial components as well? Particularly the Mobo and Video Card. I was planning on putting these inside either an Antec p150 or it's twin, the Solo. My first choices for mobo's therefore were for micro-atx boards (even though I know standard atx will fit inside them). Any prior experiences with micro-atx boards would be appreciated too. What do you think of these? ASUS A8V-VM - ~$40. At least one Newegg user has reported running Ubuntu 6.10 on it. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131069 ASUS M2NPV-VM - ~$80. Twice the price of the Asus A8V-VM, but has onboard DVI. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131014 GIGABYTE GA-K8N51 - ~$50. I've never used Gigabyte boards before. This one seems solid, however. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813128031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,563
|
I treat 512MB of RAM as a minimum for XP these days - 1GB preferred. The other components, like the processor, depend more on the tasks you want the system to perform. The semprons are fine for an office type system.
For your motherboard - be careful with your socket. The three different boards you picked use three different processor sockets. The processors you linked to are all skt754 - which is now an older platform, but very stable. Unfortunately, good motherboards are difficult to find - the best I can do is this Biostar (it has on-board video which I imagine you'll be wanting for this kind of system) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813138053 You *could* go with a newer socket - AM2 - which will open up higher quality ASUS motherboards. But the AM2 semprons are more expensive than the 754 equivalents. FK Edit: Changed my mind on the motherboard. The one I linked to previously has only one IDE channel - no good if you have IDE opticals and hard drives. This one has two. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813138268 Last edited by freakitchen; 02-12-2007 at 07:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
Quote:
Asus M2N-MX http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131040 Asus M2V-MX http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131143 Neither appear to have onboard DVI, but that would be okay if i'm able to find a nice, quiet, low priced Nvidia card to pair with the board. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,563
|
If you decide to do that, get the M2N-MX - it has an Nvidia chipset which is superior to the VIA chipset on the M2V-MX. No boards available with on-board DVI unfortunately, but yes, you can add a dedicated video card.
I know you haven't asked for help with the other parts for this system, but remember that an AM2 build requires DDR2 as opposed to DDR for socket 754. You'll also need a quality ATX 2 Power Supply - as these boards are based around PCI-Express video. FK |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Come in Ray...
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,668
|
Don't discount Biostar, they are very solid boards.
I use one in my main machine which runs Ubuntu (Socket A, nVidea chipset, GE 440 MX graphics) very well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
Is an Intel based board with a Celeron-D out of the question? Here's a combo with an Asus motherboard right around $100:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131029 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819112205 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
Any recommendations you have on that front would be appreciated. After deciding on the CPU and Motherboard, I was going to ask for help with my video card. I tend to go with EVGA, but I think anything quiet, stable and inexpensive will do. My only concern here is if I later decide to add something like Beryl to my linux box. In that case (and assuming that Beryl is mostly GPU/Memory dependent) i'd like my card to be able to handle the graphics. Perhaps something like this? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130188 Beryl Link: http://www.beryl-project.org/ Quote:
Quote:
Also, about the Intel Celeron D 336 Prescott 2.8GHz. Do Prescotts run hot and loud? I seem to remember some talk a while back pertaining to this, as compared to Northwood Pentiums. Last edited by Stretchman; 02-15-2007 at 01:42 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,563
|
This is my preferred case for budget systems at the moment - the PSU is a good one that will power a low-mid range dedicated video card:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811129012 I've played around a little with Beryl - it's very nice. It does need a pretty decent video card to run it smoothly though - I'd recommend an eVGA Nvidia 7600GS. You might be able to get away with something less powerful, maybe even a 7300GT if that's a bit more than you wanted to spend. It's what I'd have recommended if you hadn't mentioned beryl. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130075 Unless a motherboard specifically states that it has on-board Firewire, then it won't have it. PCI add-on cards aren't expensive, though. Front firewire ports on cases require dedicated motherboard 'headers'. FK |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 720
|
I know it's kinda late in the thread to still be talking Sempron but...that whole processor line gets nothing but respect from me. Have had a 2800/64 in a box running 24/7 for almost 2 years now and that computer is the heaviest used box in the house. AMD is well engineered from top to bottom. The dang things trounce the competition in important benchmarks and pretty much stay cool while doing it. (Not discounting the Celerons here because it looks like the newer ones have there own benchmarks to stand on) Anyway...that approaching 80 percent market share that AMD maintained (Pre-Conroe) was ushered in with the Athlons and X2's but the Sempron carried it on it's back. Well....back to my Conroe build...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
Well - Sempron or Celeron - for a true budget machine, either will do the job fine. After all, a 50 buck processor is a 50 buck processor. What's more important is the motherboard - from a compatibility, quality, and a stability standpoint. I think you are looking too hard at the processor without considering the rest of the machine and exactly what you are going to USE it for.
If you already HAVE a processor and are looking for parts to build with around it, that's one thing - but if you are designing a build from scratch, look at the big picture. My suggestion implied onboard video was acceptable (you DID say basic office tasks) - with an AGP slot for an upgrade. It also uses standard DDR ram. You need to throw video and ram into the equation for planning this. Obviously anything with an 865 chipset (but that board DOES support C2D) or using a 754 or 939 socket is limited on upgrades. Last edited by glc; 02-16-2007 at 07:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 720
|
The Sempron 2800/64 socket 754 (oem) has fallen to 27.00. There are still a lot of mb's out there for it but they seem to be mostly 2nd tier brands. The price savings would be under 50.00 (for it and a motherboard) and the upgrade path will be non-existent shortly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Avanzato Tecnico
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,380
|
Quote:
I been planing on doing this for a while, when I saw the price on those processors I went ahead and made the purchase. I am going to combine them with BIOSTAR NF61S Micro motherboards and 512MB of Kingston Memory with Ubuntu for OS. How do you go wrong buying a 64bit processor for $27. By the way, a friend of mine has one of those clocking 2.7 Ghz using a Zalman cooler and it is running stable.
__________________
Want to help cure Cancer and other Diseases? You easily can, all you need is your Computer, Find out how!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
Shall we see how cheap we can build a computer that's gonna work and not blow up in your face? (Remember - I will NOT build with garbage components or Via/SiS chipsets!) Prices are Newegg and include shipping.
Foxconn TS-1 case $61 Sempron 2800+ 754 retail box $34.50 Biostar NF61S $61 Corsair VS 512mb DDR400 $43 WD800JD $49 Lite-On combo drive - $30 $278.50, add peripherals, OS, and software. Intel alternative: Celeron-D 331 $43 Foxconn 865G7MF-SH $51 That's $1.50 cheaper. Call it a wash, of course. So - 300 bucks or so with a cheap keyboard, mouse, and pair of tinny speakers. Add a $160 Sceptre X7G monitor and a throwaway printer. Yes, people, you CAN build a $500 computer with a 17" LCD out the door with everything, as long as you use Linux and open source software. HOWEVER - you can spend $600 (plus tax!) and get a prebuilt machine that will blow this one away. I did it for a Xmas present for my sister's stepson. It was a eMachine package deal at Best Buy with a Pentium-D 805, 1 gig of ram, a DVD burner, 200 gig hard drive, 15" LCD, cheap Canon printer, XP Media Center. ATI chipset, onboard video. They had AMD-based packages even cheaper, but with less ram, smaller hard drives, and single cores. Last edited by glc; 02-17-2007 at 03:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
Come in Ray...
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,668
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just giving you a hard time G...
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
If my sister had given me a heads up, we would have done it another way (ordered a Dell) - but when she is calling me the week before Xmas standing in the computer department at Best Buy wanting to take a computer with her and I'm 2000 miles away, that kinda limits the choices.
eMachines are not the total piles of crap they used to be. The only difference now between an eMachine and a Gateway is the case badge. I'll take an eMachine over an HP product in a heartbeat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 720
|
That's so funny how quickly the tide changes between makes. For builds, things change so quick that you just have to appreciate what you've already committed to and then stay current on stuff for any build your doing for others. In the short time that I've been learning this field,the changes have been huge! Hardware can't keep up with software, then software can't keep up with hardware. Formally top tier processors start competing with the baseline models. AMD rules...No... Intel!! Single 12v rail is fine... nope duals. Intellect tells you to expect it but the seeing of it change like that is still amazing.(In less than 2 years!) Truth is... a lot of web surfers and office machines are going to be running Conroe quad and the well balanced basic units, will follow them (for a good stretch into) the fray. Commit, move and don't look back. Those schools are going to use those computers and it will change lives...Priceless. (Sorry) They'll have a disk too!
Last edited by bd1886; 02-17-2007 at 01:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||||||
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
http://www.matbe.com/articles/lire/2...ndu/page10.php Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Emachines have also come a long way, too. It's really all about the build rather than the brand. They also had a really powerful gaming machine debut a couple of years back, though i'm not sure if they kept up with that segment of the market since. Quote:
All in all I think this is great - there are quite a few options in the low to midrange bracket for compiling a very decent Linux system. I've been flirting with the idea since the late 90's, but it looks like I can finally jump into this with a fair amount of confidence. In the meantime, I think i'm going to toy around with the Ubuntu Live-CD. Fedora 6 and Suse 10.2 also look attractive. Would anyone happen to know where I can download the Live CD's for these two distros? Last edited by Stretchman; 02-17-2007 at 06:12 PM. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doncaster, UK
Posts: 3,563
|
The solo is a nicer case, no doubt about it. But it *is* a lot more expensive, and it doesn't come with a power supply. To add a quality one will add another $40-ish to the budget. I'd spend any extra cash you have on the components, and not the case.
I'd say don't get too hung up on finding a motherboard with on-board firewire. An add-on PCI card isn't a great expense, if you find you need it - you can add one at any time. FK |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Avanzato Tecnico
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,380
|
Quote:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811173021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
Thank you for the information. I'm downloading different ISO's as of this writing. By the way, without turning this into a "Best OS Ever!" thread, are there any particular Linux Distributions, or other OS's such as FreeBSD that you have enjoyed particular success with?
As a newcomer to Linux, i'm thinking that deciding on my initial favorite distro probably won't be a matter of features per say, but rather it'll be the one that does the best job at detecting my hardware and getting me up and running with minimal fuss. Ubuntu is definitely going onto my box, but I thought, why limit myself there? So perhaps I could partition my drive during the install, and save some space for other linux distros, or something like FreeBSD, which i've become more and more curious about as of late. Also, i'm using an AMD64 FX-55 on my main machine right now, is there a Fedora Core 6 or 7 "Live-CD" for that particular architecture? |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Kickin' it
Staff
Premium Member
|
Take a look at the "Linux Advice for New Users" thread that is stickied at the top of this forum.
__________________
Fold for PCMech: Team 13761 |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
A lot of interesting info there, thx for pointing that out.
So I guess this is one of those questions where it's probably best to avoid the virtual peanut gallery and simply decide based on my own experiences. Sounds good to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 37,777
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Member (8 bit)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS3822185143.html BTW - Are the Linux "Live-CD's" meant to detect all of your PC's hardware from the get go? I noticed that some of my live spin distros did a good job of detecting my monitor and USB flash drive, but fell short when it came to sound. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Another noobie first build - AMD X2 | Corporal Carrot | Build Your Own PC | 5 | 12-30-2005 07:29 AM |
| Please review my new AMD build... | gamehoist | Build Your Own PC | 11 | 12-17-2005 03:00 PM |
| Best Brands of Mobo 4 HiPerf. AMD Gaming Build? | whazzzdat | Computer Hardware | 1 | 05-29-2005 02:03 AM |
| New Build - $800 Server -AMD or Intel | speeddude2000 | Computer Hardware | 0 | 12-30-2004 09:34 PM |
| hopefully the last post about my first AMD build | ACLerok | Computer Hardware | 1 | 02-10-2004 04:17 PM |