|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Eastern Arizona
Posts: 27
|
What is the best Distro for an old PC, say a 486 or Pentium 100 with limited RAM and small HD? Don't need all the bells and whistles, would like to still run KDE.
Would appreciate hearing your opinions Juanito |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 9,231
|
IMO, Without question a RedHat 5.2 or a Slackware with a 2.0.xx kernel in it. I still use the 2.0.xx kernels and the 2.2.xx kernels. I prefer them to 2.4 in a lot of cases
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 93
|
RH 6.0 is a good choice,I used to run it in my old pentium 166 PC and the installation time is less than 10 minutes with KDE and gnome installed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member (11 bit)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Blue Springs, MO
Posts: 1,766
|
What do you mean by "limited ram?" Don't expect to run KDE smoothly if you have less than 32 meg. I'd suggest you plan on 64.
CH |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (5 bit)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Eastern Arizona
Posts: 27
|
ram
If I don't have one with 65 megs lying around, I have enough old memory to fill it out to 64 or so. By today's standards, 64 Megs is Limited Some of the old Unix systems ran on 64 K Bites, if my memory serves me right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Arlington, TN
Posts: 5,538
|
Running KDE can be a problem. It seems to me that KDE runs pretty good at 128M of RAM but too much disk thrashing with only 64. I have Slackware 7.1 running on a P200 and E-Smith running on a P166. Both have 64M of RAM but I rarely use KDE or any other gui on them. The work pretty well as file/web servers.
__________________
Want to Make $$$$ with your Computer? No Risk! Simply press shift-4 four times in a row |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|