|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
minimum space?
I'm thinking about a Win2K or Linux TFC server but I don't know what the minimum HDD space is?
Logan
__________________
Main: Gigabyte GA-770T USB3 - Phenom II 840 - 4GB DDR3 - Radeon 5750 1GB HTPC: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 - Athlon II 250 - 4GB DDR2 - Radeon 5670 512MB HTPC: Zotac GeForce 6100E-E - Athlon X2 5800+ - 4GB DDR2 "Play a Windows CD backwards and you'll hear satanic voices, thats nothing, play it forwards and it installs Windows." |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
win2k is 4gigs... i dunno about linux
__________________
Friends help you move. REAL friends help you move bodies. - me quite possibly the best book ever written... by me |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Atwater Mn. USA
Posts: 429
|
Hi,
Install size depends on what you want to do exactly. I've seen a Linux install that fit on a single floppy. Most server installs can be done under 800megs easily (that's with a gui interface). Much less if you run from the CLI. OOPS!
__________________
If you think you understand what's going on. Then you haven't been paying attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
hmm.... 4GB for Win2K? Pro not server? scratch that one off the list.
These really tiny Linux(right?) are they fully functional?I got a 9GB, 4GB, 6GB, and 2GB SCSI, I want to use some of them for OS's on "the big PC"(what I call my main PC) like Win2K, Win98fe, and Linux. However, I haven't tested the 6 or 2GB SCSI and I'm pretty sure the 2GB has bite the dut. I got a second 9GB, and second 2GB, but they won't boot properly .Logan |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 275
|
I guess it depends on what you mean by fully functional. If you are talking about having a fancy GUI then you are going to be talking about 250-500MB install. There are distros like that out there. Peanut Linux is one of them. I just installed Red Hat 7.3 and did a fairly complete install. It took up about 2.5MB if I remember right (I'm not at that computer right now).
freezinbutt |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
Logan_85,
I did a install of 2k Pro without anything custom, and it was right at 995 MB. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
oh, yea, win2k (pro or server) doesn't take up 4 gb's of space after installation... sorry. it requires 4-gig's for its operation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Resident AMD enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,445
|
4GB for operation? What is that about?
Logan |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Resident Slacker
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Suisun City, California (i know, where the hell is that?!?!?)
Posts: 2,620
|
i dunno, it's just the minimum requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 921
|
When I installed red hat 7.1 with the works it took up 2.5gigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member (9 bit)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Posts: 275
|
I just installed Red Hat 7.3 and did a fairly complete install. It took up about 2.5MB if I remember right (I'm not at that computer right now).
freezinbutt [/B][/QUOTE] Just found this mistake. I meant 2.5GB not MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member (7 bit)
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 93
|
I've been running windows 2000 pro on a 2.1 gig hdd for a long time without any problem.The installation took less than 800mb space.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|