|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Eggs anyone?
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,560
|
Got one computer running as server win98se, cable modem hook up to it, Sygate proxy, there will be about 7 computer sharing connection from it. Will a hub do or should a switch be used. TIA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Administrator
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 41,189
|
Depends how cheap you can find a switch as opposed to a straight hub. Switches are always better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member (12 bit)
Premium Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 2,275
|
A hub is plenty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
I am, in reality, a moose
Staff
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RTP, NC
Posts: 2,453
|
it depends on the level of traffic that you have. if you are finding that are have a large number of collisions (seen as delays), then a switch will serve you well.
while the costs of switches as compared to hubs, have narrowed, switches are still a more expensive solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member (10 bit)
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 775
|
Yea, a hub in your situation is fine. While generally speaking switches are better, they can also slow things down or mess your network up if implemented improperly. You could create a heck of a bottleneck/packet mess by just throwing switches at a network latency problem.
But I digress...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member (10 bit)
|
In fact, it's a bad idea to throw computer equipment of any kind at a problem. Or for that matteer anywhere. It's not good for it.
....Sorry, I just couldn't resist.... -KEiTH :S------------------ Well, I'm off to go look for myself. If I should get back before I return, tell myself to wait for me. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|