Go Back   PCMech Forums > Help & Discussion > Networking & Online Security

Need Some Help? Type Your Keywords Here:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-29-2000, 05:13 PM   #1
Member (10 bit)
 
figarowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Morrisville,NC, US
Posts: 572
Send a message via AIM to figarowa
Cool

tom's hardware has posted an article that shoots down Rambus and their RDRAM which is Intel's latest sham to get pc users to spend even more money on...heres the link... http://www.tomshardware.com/mainboar...529/index.html
Which i think is a good thing cuz i sure as hell don't have the ca$h to spend on that just for ram...hopefully soon the whole thing will die and DDR ram shall pave the way for future ram...just my thoughts..
figarowa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2000, 06:14 PM   #2
"Normal" again....??
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,600
Post

Intel already plans to drop RDRAM. Why do you think that they are so willing to replace the CC820 motherboard with a VC820 with 128Mb of RDRAM (you don't have to return any RAM). I've done one replacement already and here is the catch. You MUST run a terminator in the empty RAM slot. The terminators are impossible to find forcing you to buy another RDRAM module. Slick way of dumping stock and recovering some investment even if it is just a small percentage.

------------------
If it ain't broke, you're not pushing hard enough!
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2000, 04:47 PM   #3
Eggs anyone?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,560
Post

Pretty slick indeed.....
Omletteboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2000, 07:00 PM   #4
"Normal" again....??
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,600
Post

Even funnier is the rumor that Intel is going to give their employees a "free" computer. Any bets to what motherboard will be going into it?

------------------
If it ain't broke, you're not pushing hard enough!
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2000, 10:53 AM   #5
Member (13 bit)
 
Floppyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,796
Talking

Gee I wonder? It dare not have a amd chipset....
Floppyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2000, 01:02 PM   #6
Member (13 bit)
 
M. A. Dockter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,130
Send a message via AIM to M. A. Dockter
Post

It'll be a brand spanking new AMD Athlon. Only the best for Chipzilla's workers!

------------------
M. A. Dockter
Forum Administrator
mdockter@pcmech.com
http://www.pcmech.com/dockter.htm
M. A. Dockter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2000, 01:04 PM   #7
"Normal" again....??
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,600
Post

Hey Doc... share that whacky weed a little

------------------
If it ain't broke, you're not pushing hard enough!
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2000, 03:09 PM   #8
Member (13 bit)
 
M. A. Dockter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,130
Send a message via AIM to M. A. Dockter
Post

no no no...none of that...or the liquid form.
Try NyQill. That's the best drug in the world. If anyone hasn't seen Lewis Black's Comedy act on Comedy Central TV.

------------------
M. A. Dockter
Forum Administrator
mdockter@pcmech.com
http://www.pcmech.com/dockter.htm
M. A. Dockter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2000, 03:34 PM   #9
"Normal" again....??
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,600
Post

MMMMMmmmmmmm.... NyQuil

------------------
If it ain't broke, you're not pushing hard enough!
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2000, 05:32 PM   #10
Member (13 bit)
 
Floppyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,796
Post

Hey Doc,

If you're calling the athlon the best...why are you still using Intel cpus?
Floppyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2000, 07:31 PM   #11
Member (8 bit)
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: In the middle of nowhere, which is St. Marys, PA
Posts: 244
Send a message via ICQ to Joe Auman
Post

I heard in MaximumPC that the PIV will be set with single-channel Rambus chipset memory. Maybe it isn't going out just yet...

------------------
FATAL ERROR!!

Non-System brain or brain error!!
Replace and strike any key when ready.
Joe Auman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2000, 12:52 AM   #12
Member (8 bit)
 
lynchmob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 226
Post

What I cant believe is that Intel never resolved the empty slot bug I had heard about a few months ago: My understanding(sketchy) was that rdram wouldnt work if all the dimm slots were filled.Right?
lynch
lynchmob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2000, 05:41 AM   #13
"Normal" again....??
 
HAL9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 17,600
Post

They had problems with 3 RDRAM slots, so they reduced it to 2. Any empty slots must be filled in with a terminator.

------------------
If it ain't broke, you're not pushing hard enough!
HAL9000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2000, 02:18 PM   #14
Member (9 bit)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 507
Send a message via ICQ to Mattman Send a message via AIM to Mattman Send a message via Yahoo to Mattman
Post

Intel will not walk away from RAMBUS anytime soon. I found the REAL reason that Intel is sticking so closely to RAMBUS, along with chip makers like Samsung and NEC.

Here's a clip from a Tom's Hardware Article about it:

When Intel 'decided' to go for Rambus technology some three years ago, it wasn't out of pure believe into technology and certainly not just 'for the good of its customers', but simply because they got an offer they couldn't refuse. Back then Rambus authorized a contingency warrant for 1 million shares of its stock to Intel, exercisable at only $10 a share, in case Chipzilla ships at least 20% of its chipsets with RDRAM-support in back-to-back quarters. As of today Intel could make some nifty 158 million Dollars once it fulfills the goal.

This stands in direct opposition to recent claims saying Intel had just 'licensed' Rambus technology just as much as AMD has, which was supposed to prove that Intel and Rambus aren't the bad boys at all. Well, as far as I know, AMD is not making some 160 million bucks if it endorses RDRAM and I can tell you that there IS a difference between receiving 160 million dollars and NOT receiving this sweet little amount of money. Don't you agree?


The whole article can be found at http://www.tomshardware.com/blurb/00...525/index.html .

I don't expect RAMBUS to die anytime soon, which is why I'm not suprised that the Wilamette chipset will use RDRAM. Looks like it's VIA or bust for Intel customers.

[This message has been edited by Mattman (edited 06-18-2000).]
Mattman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2000, 05:05 PM   #15
Member (13 bit)
 
Xayd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: nowhere.com
Posts: 4,820
Send a message via AIM to Xayd
Post

Perfect example of why I haven't owned a box with a Chipzilla device in it since the K6-2.

I at one point saw AMD as nipping at the heels of Chipzilla with chips like the K6-2. Now, I see AMD starting a slow process of beating Intel into submission...

Xayd
Xayd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Still Need Help? Type Your Keywords Here:


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1